The $309 billion the government pumped into the banks and AIG has, so far, earned the government -- and taxpayers -- $25.2 billion. That's an 8.2 percent return over two years -- better than you would've gotten by investing in Treasury bills or money-market funds, though worse than you would've gotten from the stock market over the same period. And it kept the financial market from collapsing. Not bad, right?
That's not how the voters see it. TARP is among the least popular policies in recent memory. It has already lost some politicians -- like Utah's Sen. Bob Bennet -- their jobs, and will doubtless take more in November. Pollsters and politicians will tell you that part of the reason for the stimulus's unpopularity is that many voters confuse it with TARP. And yet, TARP may be the highest-return policy the government has implemented in decades. When you add up the benefits of the financial system not melting down, and then the direct returns to the investment, the bang-for-the-buck has been astounding. But good policy does not always make good politics.
Click to view image: 'TARP'
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
Struggle in Iran's streets beyond elections
-
WTF??? Fed's rate cut doesn't save stocks!
-
Fascism is Fun
-
kaur is queen
-
Glenn Beck Observes Barney Franks 69th Birthday!
-
Feds Bail Out A.I.G
-
SEC Engages in Conspiracy with AIG to Hide Bailout Evidence
-
2nd Assassination Attempt Caught On Film
-
"Affirmative action" caused the financial crisis
-
Obama say what? Compares Big Banks, AIG, to Suicide Bombers
-
4 decade bank veteran tells Congress Americans will never get their $200B back, was wasted for nothing.





TARP had to be done. Hated it tho.
Posted Nov-5-2010 Bydcmfox (30743.36) 
dcmfox View Channel Send Message
(1)
Thank god for Hank Paulson. If he had been an academic (i.e. college professor or the like).....we might be sustaining ourselves with back yard vegetables.
Posted Nov-5-2010 Bychauncie (191.80) 
chauncie View Channel Send Message
(0)
I wouldn't pave over your garden just yet......
Posted Nov-5-2010 ByTongueboy (3083.44) Tongueboy View Channel Send Message
(0)
what I would like to know is what is it being used for,or better yet where did it go to.?????
Posted Nov-5-2010 Bycocytan (360.22) 
cocytan View Channel Send Message
(0)
Links are always helpful, because you know, everyone on the internet is a genius.
Posted Nov-5-2010 ByRoezen (35.58) 
Roezen View Channel Send Message
(0)
Try google and new, takes 2 seconds a every news outlet has an article on it.
You are correct tho, next time I will provide a link. Sry
Posted Nov-5-2010 ByFlash_Back (651.36) Flash_Back View Channel Send Message
(0)
I could be mistaken but you're the one touting a political position.
A couple of things your article didn't mention:
"The Treasury said in an Oct. 5 report that it expects to lose about $17 billion on the separate $80 billion TARP payout to Detroit automakers General Motors Co. and Chrysler LLC."
%u201CThese are all indirect subsidies the banks got,%u201D Prins said. %u201CSo the TARP gains touted by the Treasury are only true if you ignore all the other costs.%u201D
http://www.b More..
Posted Nov-5-2010 ByRoezen (35.58) 
Roezen View Channel Send Message
(0)
I merely posted this because this was actually big news an no one on this site had posted anything on it.
Posted Nov-6-2010 ByFlash_Back (651.36) Flash_Back View Channel Send Message
(1)
These are all indirect subsidies the banks got, Prins said. So the TARP gains touted by the Treasury are only true if you ignore all the other costs.
Apparently, the forum doesn't like something with that articles format.
Posted Nov-5-2010 ByRoezen (35.58) 
Roezen View Channel Send Message
(0)