Call it "targeted killing" or "termination with extreme prejudice", a state has no right to kill its citizens without due process of law. The potential for abuse is huge. There is no accountability, only the say so of the president and the echos of the press that he or she was a "threat" to national security. If this is allowed to happen without the public lifting a finger in protest, it won't be long before surveillance drones, which already are used by police all over the U.S., are used for targeted killings on the US soil as well.
Watch carefully the legal reasoning that is going to issue from the pen and mouth of the Attorney General Eric Holder. He's said he was going to explain why political assassinations of US citizens are justified. Under Bush we had the legalization of torture, BHO goes one step further.
Brought to you by Press TV Global News.
By: khamomil
In: World News, Politics, Science and Technology
Tags: targetted killings, political assassination, drone, national security, khamomil,
Marked as: approved
Views: 1603 | Comments: 90 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
The National Security Strategy of the United Kingdom
-
Leftists: new PM national security advisor is a fascist
-
Obama Bans Islam, Jihad From National Security Strategy Document
-
Beck on Obama's Civilian National Security Force - "Who Are We Fighting?"
-
Civilian National Security Force - You Voted For It!!
-
Current and Projected National Security Threats to the United States
-
Israel's National Security Aide Barred From U.S.
-
The President Ties His Own Hands on Terror and Compromises National Security
-
Ex-CIA chief: Obama Risks National Security
-
(diagram) "How the FBI uses national security letters" (Mar.2007)
-
McCain Trusted More Than Obama on Economy, Iraq, National Security
-
Liz Cheney: Obama’s Binge Spending Is a “National Security Threat to the Country”



