Safe Mode: On
Con Artist Caught Lying

Erica Payne debates Peter Schiff but there are some things she doesn't want you to know. She criticizes corporations for not all being required to pay 35% yet her corporation pays nothing in taxes and pays a majority of its earnings out to her in the form of a salary.


Added: Aug-24-2012 Occurred On: Aug-24-2012
By: Templeton
In: Politics
Tags: Erica Payne. Peter Schiff, Fox News, Government, Obama
Location: United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 1481 | Comments: 41 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.

  • Lol this 'woman' starts to call the guy moron when he wins the argument. Weakness.

    Posted Aug-24-2012 By 
    erikz (413.70)  

    (7)

  • LOL she almost sounds like Lois from the Family Guy, talking all snobbish to Peter and stuff.

    Posted Aug-24-2012 By 
    Zippity (113.70)  

    (4)

  • pay your fair share you cunt.

    Posted Aug-24-2012 By 
    buoymarker (573.60)  

    (3)

  • SO unprofessional to use name calling to try to get the upper hand.

    Posted Aug-24-2012 By 
    shuttlespace (941.54)  

    (2)

    • @shuttlespace Stating facts is never unprofessional regardless of someones thin skin.

      Posted Aug-24-2012 By 
      jaydenfre (317.92)

      (-1)

    • @jaydenfre it's a big distraction from the topic and a person's personal weaknesses should not be a target in civil debate.

      Posted Aug-24-2012 By 
      shuttlespace (941.54)  

      (0)

    • @shuttlespace If you are debating a moron It's not a distraction.I don't personally think it's a serious debate because Peter Schiff along with FOX news knows their Debate is more propaganda than fact.

      Posted Aug-24-2012 By 
      jaydenfre (317.92)

      (-1)

    • @jaydenfre you're right about the FOX thing.

      Posted Aug-24-2012 By 
      shuttlespace (941.54)  

      (0)

    • @jaydenfre When you've worked intelligently enough to build a net worth of approximately $300,000,000 maybe you can go on fox news and give your opinion of how stupid you think he is. Until then, you seem like just another poor unsuccessful bastard trying to tell a highly successful individual that he's stupid while you heat up your cup-o-soup with fish crackers and surf the web.

      Posted Aug-25-2012 By 
      Templeton (359.90)

      (0)

  • This woman re-defines shrill.

    She is impossible to listen to, even if you agree with her.

    Sad thing is she actually believes consumers fund the economy, when in fact business funds consumers, government and not-for-profit entities, including economic parasites like Erica Payne.

    Posted Aug-24-2012 By 
    hdadd (265.10)  

    (2)

  • What a cunt.

    Hope she gets ran over by a truck and slowly dies.

    Posted Aug-24-2012 By 
    Ahahuimamakamakua (136.34)  
    Ahahuimamakamakua
    View Channel
    Send Message

    (1)

  • Liberalism is a mental disorder.

    Posted Aug-24-2012 By 
    sprodge (1346.16)  

    (1)

  • Who cares if she is a con artist? The only thing that matters is: Do her arguments work?
    All I can say is that Peter Schiff talks more sense than most economists I have heard. What he is saying is usually just common sense. I don't know about "job creators" and all that "trickle down" stuff, but you sure can't borrow your way out of debt. Though I think that the stimulus money would have been better spent paying off people's loans, because the banks get their money anyway, a More..

    Posted Aug-24-2012 By 
    wellybub (348.18)  

    (1)

  • Schiff and Paul is probably the two most truthful experts on the economy...

    Posted Aug-24-2012 By 
    gizmo8 (418.26)  

    (1)

  • Of course the only answer is to spend more and tax more!

    Posted Aug-24-2012 By 
    LickMyDuck (540.90)  

    (0)

  • That bitch should be sendt home in tare and feathers....

    Posted Aug-24-2012 By 
    ComDiver (348.40)
    ComDiver
    Send Message

    (0)

  • Classic ad hominem

    Posted Aug-24-2012 By 
    gbomb323 (188.84)  

    (0)

  • She's right,Peter is a Moron,Consumers create jobs..Anyone that has a basic education in economics would know that.Says a lot about Peter.BTW Agenda Project is a non-profit organization.

    Posted Aug-24-2012 By 
    jaydenfre (317.92)

    (-3)

    • @jaydenfre It's a fairly equal split between both positions. Generally the very first thing to happen in business is the creation of a product. Then that product is marketed, finds interest, and is sold to the interested party. Knowledge of products existence produces additional interest and consumer demand allows the business to survive and expand operations which produces additional jobs. For one to exist, the other must as well. Peter is well aware of this but her negativity and constant inte More..

      Posted Aug-24-2012 By 
      Templeton (359.90)

      (0)

    • @Templeton The consumer is the demand, not the business.A business is a provider to the demand.The Demand creates the provider.

      Comparing percentages of revenue means nothing.She makes under $250,000.00 a year and CEO's can make millions with no taxes While paying employees minimum wage and costing the tax payer billions in medical coverage from the company not providing any.

      Posted Aug-24-2012 By 
      jaydenfre (317.92)

      (0)

    • @jaydenfre It's pretty profitable for Erica Payne.

      Posted Aug-24-2012 By 
      hdadd (265.10)  

      (0)

    • @jaydenfre Your first two points are correct (incidentally, I never said at any point that the business was the demand) but your third point isn't so cut and dry nor is it accurate. I'll give one example, which there are thousands of.

      Coca Cola created the soft drink long before there was a demand for the product. The fact that the product tasted good, to some, allowed for a demand to be created for it. The demand grew as knowledge of its existence grew which allowed coca cola to sell more prod More..

      Posted Aug-24-2012 By 
      Templeton (359.90)

      (0)

    • @Templeton Your point on coca cola is totally false..First,soda fountains were around long before corporate bottling companies with specific flavors.Soda fountains allowed small businesses like family run drug stores and grocery stores to mix their own flavors.Demand for soft drinks in general were well established and popular before specific flavors turned to bottling.

      Your other remarks about her pay simply re-enforce my statement of your comparisons as apples and oranges.

      Posted Aug-24-2012 By 
      jaydenfre (317.92)

      (-1)