Safe Mode: On
Churnalism - Media B.S. Masquerading As Serious Journalism.

█»» Which news articles are not researched
█»» by journalists, but are simply based
█»» closely on press releases? Chris Atkins
█»» investigates the murky process of
█»» 'Churnalism'.
██████»»»»»»»»»»»»▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬««««««««««««███
█»» News in the Age of Churnalism
█»» journalist-or-churnalistAccording to Pew
█»» Charitable Trust’s 2008 “State of the
█»» News Media” special report on public
█»» attitudes toward the news media,
█»» “Majorities of Americans continued to
█»» say that journalists are often
█»» inaccurate (55 percent), do not care
█»» about the people they report on (53
█»» percent), are biased (55 percent),
█»» one-sided (66 percent) and try to cover
█»» up their mistakes (63 percent).” It’s
█»» clear that much of the public deems
█»» journalists untrustworthy. As a recent
█»» grad from a journalism school, it’s
█»» painful to admit how fallible the news
█»» industry can be. One near-omnipresent
█»» snare for journalists—and a scourge of
█»» journalistic integrity—is the facile
█»» use of press releases to write stories,
█»» what has been dubbed “churnalism.”
█◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙█

Loading the player ...
Embed Code
Plays: 3857 (Embed: 0)


█◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙█
█»» The UK-based Media Standards Trust,
█»» “an independent registered charity
█»» which aims to foster high standards
█»» in news media on behalf of the public,”
█»» developed a website called Churnalism
█»» so that journalists and consumers can
█»» discern spin from news. “The site
█»» compresses all articles published on
█»» [UK] national newspaper websites
█»» and then stores them in a fast access
█»» database,” according to the Trust’s
█»» website. “If the engine finds any
█»» articles where the similarity is
█»» greater than 20 percent, then it
█»» suggests the article may be churn.”
█»»▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
█»» Expecting a snide, skeptical,
█»» uninterested response from the
█»» ostensibly guilty journalists, Media
█»» Standards Trust baited the news cycle
█»» with a discreetly published, fake
█»» press release for an unbelievable
█»» product. The Trust’s Martin Moore
█»» elaborated during an interview on
█»»▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
█»» WNYC’s On the Media:
█»» Chris [Atkins, a collaborator with
█»» the Trust] invented what he called
█»» the “chastity garter belt,” which a
█»» woman would put around her thigh and
█»» had built-in technology which would
█»» record, by various clever scientific
█»» means, like her, her rising pulse rate
█»» and, and moisture levels on her leg,
█»» whether or not she was about to be
█»» unfaithful. And if she was, it would
█»» text a message to her partner warning
█»» him, so he could rush back and either
█»» forestall or catch, catch her before
█»» she did so.
█»»▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
█»»
█»»
Click to view image: 'CLASSIC CHURNALISM: Freddie Starr Ate My Hamster'

█»»
█»» CLASSIC CHURNALISM: Freddie Starr Ate My Hamster
█»»
█»»▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
█»» Like hungry goldfish, the press
█»» gobbled the plump worm dangling before
█»» them. Chicago’s WGN-TV ran a short
█»» segment and, as Moore detailed during
█»» the WNYC interview, “The story was
█»» picked up by The Times of India, in
█»» the States, in Slovakia, in Greece,
█»» in Israel, all around the world.”
█»»▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
█»»
█»»
Click to view image: 'OLI NORTH TESTIMONY - Abu Nidal Excerpt.'

█»»
█»» OLI NORTH TESTIMONY - Abu Nidal Excerpt.
█»» Upon being questioned by Congress, North
█»» did NOT as is oft claimed, say that,
█»» "..bin Laden is(was) the greater danger
█»» to world peace..." It was someone MUCH
█»» more dangerous, Abu Nidal! Bin Laden
█»» simply 'fitted the bill' at that later time,
█»» so was left in the frame....
█»»
█»»▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
█»» That's, is called egg on the face?
█»» As an end note, just a reminder the
█»» public shouldn’t only be concerned
█»» with sneaky, unverified pitches from
█»» snake-oil retailers. “Not all
█»» churnalism comes from commercial
█»» sources,” warns the Columbia
█»» Journalism Review. “Much of it has
█»» political sources: public authorities
█»» trying to spin bad news, medical firms
█»» trying to obscure poor results, and
█»» political lobbying groups.”

█»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»█

█»» For what it’s worth, 55 percent of this
█»» post was cut and pasted from various
█»» websites and not independently act -
█»» checked.

█»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»█
█»» COURTESY:
█»»▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
█»» Sources: Columbia Journalism Review,
█»» On the Media
█»» Guardian News & Media Ltd
█»» by Will Wlizlo
█»»▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬█
█»» Read more at:
█»»▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
http://www.utne.com/Media/News-In-The-Age-Of-Churnalism.aspx#ixzz1HnwfbNJQ
http://www.utne.com/media.aspx#ixzz1HntlYKB6
█»»▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬█


Added: Apr-4-2011 
By: The_Dogs_Bollox
In:
News, Arts and Entertainment
Tags: journalism, churnalism, media criticism, Pew Charitable Trust, media, On the Media, Columbia Journalism Review, Will Wlizlo
Marked as: approved
Views: 5397 | Comments: 11 | Votes: 2 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • "Churnalism" is a perfect word to call much of what passes for news. Perhaps it serves a useful function - it's proof that any thinking person really needs to question almost everything we are told by government and the media.

    Posted Apr-4-2011 By 

    (2)

    • Actually its mass manipulation of the population,Tells them how to feel and how to think about a subject.Criminal in my opinion.

      Posted Apr-4-2011 By 

      (0)

    • Of course but it's our reality. The government, corporations and special interest groups all have an agenda all their own, that has to be broadcast and protected by the media to get them to think how they want. The result is the real news we get is usually either false or devoid of any real information. This doesn't work on everyone, naturally, but if it works on the majority of the population it's good enough for "them".

      Posted Apr-4-2011 By 

      (0)

  • I don't believe shit anymore.
    I'm so jaded and pessimistic.

    Basically, I assume everyone and everything is lying to me. And if they are not, I'm pleasently surprised.

    Posted Apr-4-2011 By 

    (2)

  • Excellent.

    Posted Apr-4-2011 By 

    (1)

  • "Journalism" is a facade now. These people are agenda driven. They're in bed with the American left.

    They abdicated their responsibilities to get Barack Hussein Obama elected, and now they carry the water for him.

    Posted Apr-4-2011 By 

    (0)

    • The reality is that the president is owned by the corporatists and the media is ran by them. That is why there was never any opposition allowed for Bush's wars, they love war and none of them ever talk about the real pressing issues in this nation that go against corporate interests of parsing out this country to the highest bidders. And your beloved fox news is the worst of the bunch.

      BTW you can thank Reagan for how media is total shit now, he got away with the fairness doctrine.

      Posted Apr-4-2011 By 

      (-1)

    • Yes, the Daily Sun, BBC, and Radio 5 all have vested interest in US politics..........

      Posted Apr-4-2011 By 

      (0)

  • daily mail really has an unproffesional side to them. theres spelling and grammar errors all over their articles. it's kinda weird cuz other than that it seems like a nice paper, lots of interesting stories. its pretty funny how the guy in this vid made them look like dumbasses. i hope they feel stupid and replace some people on their staff.

    Posted Apr-4-2011 By 

    (0)

  • Comment of user 'nurdmyth' has been deleted by author!
  • "them" = "the people"

    Posted Apr-4-2011 By 

    (0)