Safe Mode: On
DNC jobless benefits were slated to run out in december before elections.

How conveeeenient..absolutely shameless debauchery.

http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2010/07/23/unemployment-benefits-to-start-flowing-again-but-congress-left-some-economic-help-undone/

Unemployment Benefits To Start Flowing Again, But Congress Left Some Economic Help Undone
By: Scott Nance
July 23rd, 2010 @ 8:40 pm

Although unemployment benefits will once again start flowing to millions of jobless Americans, Congress failed to follow through on crucial pieces of their plans to aid the ailing economy.

President Obama Thursday signed hard-fought legislation Thursday that extends the emergency unemployment compensation, or EUC, program and full federal funding of state extended benefits through November 27. Because the law is retroactive, eligible claimants now may be paid for weeks of unemployment after the previous law expired on June 5.

Millions of out-of-work Americans had begun losing their unemployment benefits after the previous extension expired, causing even greater hardship for those looking for work and leaving many to face dire circumstances, such as homelessness. Republicans repeatedly blocked a new extension from coming to a vote; finally, two members of the Senate GOP broke ranks with the others, enabling the Senate to pass a new extension.

National unemployment stands at 9.5 percent, but is in the double digits in many places, including Nevada and Michigan. Long-term unemployment, or the number of Americans out of work six months or longer, is at levels unseen since World War II.

“We applaud the actions of the president and Congress to provide this important financial lifeline for more than 200,000 Pennsylvanians who otherwise would have run out of benefits by July 31,” says Sandi Vito, Pennsylvania’s state labor & industry secretary. “All eligible individuals will be notified by mail, and we are expediting claims processing to get this much-needed money to Pennsylvanians who are out of work through no fault of their own.”

Vito, however, foresees having to clear a backlog created by the expiration of benefits for many.

“We expect a very high volume of claims due to the congressional delay in reauthorizing these vital programs, so we ask claimants to please be patient and use the online services whenever possible,” she says. “We do understand how important these benefits are to Pennsylvanians, and we will do everything we can to ensure their swift delivery.”

However, in order to win votes for the continuation of unemployment insurance, Senate Democrats stripped down their legislation, which means key economic supports they argued were necessary aren’t happening.

Specifically, Congress has not extended state fiscal assistance contained within last year’s economic stimulus program, or the small but highly cost-effective TANF Emergency Fund, which together are helping create hundreds of thousands of jobs, according to Chad Stone, chief economist at the Washington-based Center for Budget and Policy Priorities.

States are continuing to lay off workers and cut spending to offset weak tax revenues, and these steps are impeding the economic recovery, Stone says. By extending state fiscal assistance, which will largely run out by December 31, Congress can help states balance their budgets with fewer job-killing spending cuts, he says.

Congress also should extend the TANF Emergency Fund, which 36 states and the District of Columbia are using to help create subsidized jobs in the private and public sectors. States estimate they will have placed about 240,000 people in these jobs by the time the fund expires on September 30, but many states plan to start shutting down their programs in the next month unless Congress extends the fund.

“Let’s hope [the successful unemployment extension] vote is a harbinger of speedy action on these two pressing issues,” Stone says.

The publisher of the news site On The Hill, Scott Nance has covered Congress and the federal government for more than a decade.


Click to view image: 'd901c90ff711-dems.jpg'

Added: Aug-9-2010 
By: HydrogenEconomy
In:
News
Tags: unemployment, jobless, benefits, in, time, for, election, dnc
Views: 6297 | Comments: 7 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Explain how paying people to not work is going to get people back to work?

    Simple question.

    Posted Aug-10-2010 By 

    (1) | Report

    • wow, where's the liberals at on this one? ohhh that's right, they see those nasty words like JOB..WORK..they get all scared and hide under the bed, worthless idiots

      Posted Aug-10-2010 By 

      (1) | Report

  • One more time.I'll go slow for you.Republicans are a
    numerical minority.They can't block ANYTHING.They do
    not have enough votes to block Anything.All democrats
    have to do,is get enough of THEIR party to vote in
    favor of a bill,and it's smooth sailing for them.The
    problem is that enough democrats oppose the bill,that
    it will not pass.Cheers.

    Posted Aug-10-2010 By 

    (1) | Report

  • Jobless benefits for more than 2 years (let alone six months) just encourages people to stay unemployed. Everyone I know personally, and see on the news who falls into this category is either: 1) lazy and isn't looking for work, 2) thinks its "beneath" them to settle for anything but a 100k job, or 3) is working under the table and milking unemployment. The reason why unemployment is so high is because Obama, Pelosi, and fellow members of the far left won't stop extending jobless bene More..

    Posted Aug-10-2010 By 

    (0) | Report

  • The us government will soon own ALL the workforce.....

    Posted Aug-10-2010 By 

    (0) | Report

  • I guess I don't understand the point of this post.
    Unemployment extension was passed after dems removed the stuff republicans didn't want.
    Now they say they do want it but vote against it?
    Where does the "shameless debauchery" come in?
    Does the poster even know what those words mean?
    What the hell was this post trying to say?

    Posted Aug-10-2010 By 

    (0) | Report

  • What a disgrace!

    Posted Aug-10-2010 By 

    (-1) | Report