Safe Mode: On
Apollo 11 Landing Site Pictures

Loading Poll.....


Added: Aug-29-2012 
By: Freebasin420
In:
Conspiracy, Science and Technology
Tags: Space, Moon, Proof, Hoax,
Marked as: approved
Views: 1692 | Comments: 39 | Votes: 1 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • The problem with some people here on LL, even though they are confronted with the truth, back by facts and pictures...they still don't believe. I figure they don't like my country anyways, so fuck them.

    Posted Aug-29-2012 By 

    (4)

    • @fotoman4u2 I'm sorry to inform you, but those pictures are exactly as much proof as one's ability to photoshop something to appear real.

      They may well be actual tracks and items left there, but that doesn't mean it was from 1969 ;-)

      Posted Aug-29-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • @Steve15425 SEE! What did I say, even when confront with facts, you guys still can't remove your tinfoil hats!!! Just because you can do it in Photoshop, doesn't mean it's not true.

      Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @fotoman4u2 So, what's wrong with being a skeptic?

      Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

      (0)

  • Fake!
    LOL...
    Let's hear it you nutters. Tell us how all that was photoshopped.
    I'm waiting.

    Posted Aug-29-2012 By 

    (3)

  • why would we need a proof for that? for the idiots who are claiming its a scam? those are just idiots!

    Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

    (3)

  • Unfortunately there will always be stupid people who believe in the moon-hoax BS.

    It is depressing to see people denying one of the greatest achievements ever of Humankind.

    Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

    (3)

  • Yeah cuz that's real.

    Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Who else always votes opposite on these fucking stupid polls?

    Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Comment of user 'daveporter' has been deleted by author!
  • How much fuel would be required in a volumetric scale to lift back off ?

    Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Future tourist destination.

    Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Fake moon

    Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Well when I voted, at least 51 people on this site are completely retarded, and 171 that KNOW the USA won the space race to the moon.

    Posted Aug-31-2012 By 

    (0)

  • So how did the buggy get to where it is parked with no boot or tire tracks?

    Its all fake. They sent robots up there to make those tracks.

    Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

    (0)

    • @dirtbiker201

      First off any tracks left aren't very deep. Second, direct light on the surface of the moon is very harsh (do to the lack of an atmosphere) in which could easily washout the tracks depending on the angle of the sun (time of day) and angle in which they're viewed.

      Notice at :32 there are tracks that lead down in the direction of the buggy but stop short. Then at :47 there appears to be tracks that lead up from the buggy and stop short at about the same area they appeared to stop More..

      Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @dirtbiker201
      LOL!
      Nice trolling of the tin foil folks.

      Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @viewer1962

      I'm glad somebody got it. LOL!!!

      Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

      (1)

  • I've been asked in the past during discussions, "if we had actually landed on the moon then why can't we see it by telescope?"

    The simple answer is that everything that was left behind is just too small. Even with our highest resolution telescope, the Hubble Space Telescope an object the size of a football stadium would only be discernible as a tinny dot. To be able to make out an object as small as the largest item left behind, the base of the lunar module (called the descent stage) More..

    Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

    (0)

    • @ProofOfPurchase see I dont get that when I had astronomy in HS we didnt have super expensive telescope but it was incredible to see saturn and its rings... Saturn is way further so Im not understanding how you can see something so far away but cant see small objects on the moon that is way closer??

      Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @aa316

      You're not seeing Saturn's rings as individual rocks and dust, you're seeing it as a whole which is much larger than any man made object. And Saturn's ring are made up of mostly ice which is highly reflective in the light of the sun.

      Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

      (3)

    • @ProofOfPurchase Yet they have photo's of the apollo 17 mission with all the footprints and tracks?

      Go figure.

      Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @ThePersuader

      If you're referring to this video (Apollo 11, not 17), these images are being viewed from 25km away not from earth orbit (400,000-ish km).

      Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @ProofOfPurchase Hang on let me spend MY time on finding you the apollo 17 mission photo's. You just sit back down and enjoy your ice tea.

      Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

      (0)

  • why are the rovers parked so far away from the landers?

    Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Explaining the flaws in Apollo 11 is like explaining flaws in the bible...

    People wont accept what you have to say even tho all you are doing is questioning the flaws people have created.

    But anyway nothing will change...It did or didn't happen.

    I dont bother myself with this shit anymore Bills to pay > Argue with people that are not open minded and cannot accept negative comments made towards their american heroes.

    Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

    (0)