Safe Mode: On
VIDEO: BBC WAS HALF AN HOUR TOO EARLY REPORTING ON WTC7 COLLAPSE

On September 11th 2001, BBC World reported at 4:57pm Eastern Time that the Salomon Brothers Building (more commonly known as WTC7 or World Trade Building 7) had collapsed.

This even made the 5pm EST headlines, what is bizarre is that the building did not actually collapse until 5:20pm EST.

9/11 was unusual enough, without BBC World being able to foretell the destiny of WTC 7.

What is even stranger, is that the women reporter is telling the world that the building had collapsed when you can see it in the background over her left shoulder.

Then at 5:15pm EST, just five minutes before the building did actually collapse, her live connection from New York to London mysteriously fails.

So the question is, on 9/11 how did the BBC learn that WTC7 collapsed 23 minutes before it actually did.

Building Seven was 47 storeys, modern in design with structural steel throughout, yet symmetrically collapsed in 6.5 seconds, was someone leaking information.

No steel framed skyscraper has ever collapsed due to fire, before or after 9/11, most people who find out about WTC7, believe it was brought down by a controlled demolition, even demolition experts agree.

Please Investigate 9/11 - Time is of the essence.

Loading the player ...
Embed Code
Plays: 552743 (Embed: 0)

Added: Feb-26-2007 
By: thedreadzone
In: Other
Tags: 911, WTC7,
Marked as: approved
Views: 557357 (Rank: 120) | Comments: 15 | Votes: 14 | Favorites: 42 | Shared: 759 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.

  • I don't want to be an American Idiot...

    Posted Jul-3-2007 By 
    ANTIREDNECK (143.04)

    (1)

  • Comment of user 'tketaco' has been deleted by author!

  • SexyJock: "whoever made this video is a total IDIOT. The videos shown were clearly shot in sunny morning time, those two buildings collasped before 12 pm, and this idiot thought that wto collapsed after 5 PM???! It is obviously total fake. "
    I think you're missing something... he's not talking about the two main buildings, which did collapse before 12pm ET. He's talking about WTC7, the 42-story building that collapsed a little after 5pm ET. The building that is over her shoulder in th More..

    Posted Jun-20-2007 By 
    DaveT319 (21.52)

    (0)

  • first thing that stuck out to me was the fact there was no clock in the corner there is always a clock on bbc news plus the scrolling bar at the bottom with other headlines on. this vid is nothing but utter bullshit!

    Posted Aug-27-2007 By 
    audio (10.90)  

    (0)

  • so let me get this straight; my goverment got away with making this thing look as if OBL was behind this attack,my goverment were able to do this all but they couldnt get the TIME RIGHT FOR BBC? Pleezzzzz! your gonna have to do better then that to convince me my goverment had anything to do with getting BBC involved, i am open to my goverment doing this in order to invade Iraq foe oil but to say they got the time wrong is just stupid

    Posted Sep-12-2007 By 
    Greenbutt#1 (34.44)  

    (0)

  • i just seen the pointer towards the #7 building, one has to think that BBC got information wrong since they are not from here,i just heard its been 8hours since the twins were attacked, you have to wonder if the information they got and they screwed up was is the #7 building "may be in ganger of collapsing" because of damage of the towers falling, that is a mistake that likely has taken place but you people who look for inside job shit wont think about that, common sense tells me its a More..

    Posted Sep-12-2007 By 
    Greenbutt#1 (34.44)  

    (0)

  • eveyone will forget about this tommorrow
    nothing will happen
    life will go on

    Posted Aug-31-2007 By 
    Clarko (40.10)

    (-1)

  • Sure, no steel building has collapsed prior to WTC7, however none had also had the extensive damage to the bottom of it like WTC7 and none had been left to burn for as long as WTC had been.

    If you left any building to burn this long, of cause it is going to collapse and there are many many examples of building collapse via fire in the past having been gutted be fire.

    Posted Aug-27-2008 By 
    What_A_Load_Of (11.46)

    (2)

  • Comments: 334,

    But I only see 8, and most of the comments say this vid is bullshit. Hmmmmm.............................................................

    Posted Apr-26-2008 By 
    tremello22 (11.14)  

    (0)

  • I for one watched this as it was being aired on 911 and was perplexed as to why they would say it had collapsed when it was clearly there. But then there is the other video where , i think it was the owner of the building, gave the order to "pull it", clearly referring to building 7.
    "You can fool some of the people all of the time, all of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time" Abraham Lincoln

    Posted Jul-10-2008 By 
    BenFranklin420 (566.62)  

    (0)

  • Ok so who dished out to the BBC the press release that WT 7 had gone down before it actualy had ?

    Posted Sep-17-2009 By 
    basser (79.56)

    (3)

  • WTF, how can this be explained?

    Posted Feb-16-2009 By 
    edgar123 (10.98)

    (1)

  • Comment of user 'upMamasFarter' has been deleted by moderator!

  • inside job,lols

    Posted Mar-27-2012 By 
    AntiZionist (0.80)  

    (0)

  • Comment of user 'Rollerswartz' has been deleted by author!