While Wind Companies Get Away with Offing 400,000+ Every Year

By Dave Urbanski
Original Link:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/bird-brained-hypocrisy-oil-companies-prosecuted-for-28-dead-waterfowl-while-wind-companies-get-away-with-offing-400000-every-year/
You may have gotten wind of the seven North Dakota oil companies recently charged in federal court with the deaths of 28 migratory birds.
The birds allegedly landed in oil waste pits in western North Dakota last spring; the maximum penalty for each charge under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act is six months in prison and a $15,000 fine, the AP said.
But did you know that wind-power companies are responsible for more than 400,000 bird deaths annually, and not one has faced a single charge?
The Wall Street Journal knows it, opining yesterday that the prosecutions are “bird-brained,” especially when wind-power outfits routinely beat the rap:
The companies have pleaded not guilty, though they are not unamazed. They say they’re not responsible for the bird deaths and that, even if they were, the deaths were “incidental” to lawful commercial activity in full compliance with all environmental laws.
Law enforcement officials we talked to in North Dakota say they can’t remember such a case ever going to court. One local commentator calls it “the most absurd legal action taken by the government in the history of North Dakota.” One of the charged oil companies “even went to U.S. Fish and Wildlife and self-reported a number of birds, asking what else they could do soon after they had found the dead birds,” reports the [i]Plains Daily, North Dakota’s statewide newspaper.[/i]
U.S. Attorney Timothy Purdon is nonetheless undaunted as he pursues the cause of ornithological justice.
Absurdity aside, this prosecution is all the more remarkable because the wind industry each year kills not 28 birds, or even a few hundred, but some 440,000, according to estimates by the American Bird Conservancy based on Fish and Wildlife Service data. Guess how many legal actions the Obama Administration has brought against wind turbine operators under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act? As far as we can tell, it’s zero.
The American Bird Conservancy—no fan of the oil companies’ actions—also hammers the feds for hypocritical, selective enforcement.
“It is perplexing that similar prosecutions have yet to be brought against the operators of wind farms,” said American Bird Conservancy President George Fenwick. “Every year wind turbines kill hundreds of thousands of birds, including eagles, hawks, and songbirds, but the operators are being allowed to get away with it. It looks like a double standard.”
The Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) estimated in 2009 that about 440,000 birds were being killed by wind turbines, the ABC reports. With an anticipated twelve-fold wind energy build-out by the year 2030, bird mortality is expected to dramatically increase in the coming years, absent significant changes in the way wind farms are sited and operated. Based on studies, one wind farm in California is estimated to have killed more than 2,000 eagles, plus thousands of other birds, yet no prosecution has been initiated for violations of federal laws protecting birds.
Kevin Cramer, North Dakota’s public service commissioner, expressed concern about an apparent presumption of guilt that motivated the U.S. Wildlife Department’s 45-day helicopter search for dead birds in North Dakota’s oil fields, according to the Plains Daily.
“That’s chilling to me in a free society,” Cramer noted on a Bismark, N.D. radio show. “I’m certainly concerned this was a high priority for the government.”
Cramer agreed with the WSJ editorial board’s analysis, saying “when you selectively prosecute this way, it’s the worst injustice and the grossest form of discrimination in a free society that you can ever have.”
------
Secondary links:
http://news.yahoo.com/oil-companies-charged-nd-migratory-bird-deaths-213924170.html
http://plainsdaily.com/entry/psc-kevin-cramer-prosecutions-over-dead-birds-are-%E2%80%9Cchilling%E2%80%9D/
http://www.abcbirds.org/newsandreports/releases/110907.html
By: copperdog3
In: Politics
Tags: Environment, wind, power, big oil, oil, pollution, aviary, bird, deaths, hypocrisy, politics, politically correct
Location: United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 3011 | Comments: 23 | Votes: 2 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
DAY 34: PALIN ACCUSES OBAMA OF BEING IN BED WITH BIG OIL
-
GOP sides with Big Oil over the American people
-
Liberal,Socialist ,Democrat Maxene Waters - Socializing "Big Oil"
-
UK Wind Power Fails to Meet Expectations
-
Combined Solar and Wind Power in Japan!
-
Oil Well Fracturing and Note Worthy Facts About Big Oil Subsidies.
-
Wind power bailout coming?
-
The Iraq War and Big Oil
-
Republicans Side With Big Oil
-
Science: Offshore wind power could alter ocean currents
-
Wind Power That Floats
-
Ask a Republican - Big Oil vs Poor People






Idiocy. Wind turbines decapitate eagles and make bat lungs explode. Yet we can't throw money at them fast enough.
Posted Oct-2-2011 ByTheSanityInspector (5874.22) 
TheSanityInspector View Channel Send Message
(2)
@TheSanityInspector and birds have the best eye sight and reflexes of any animal...think they can avoid a windmill..
in n.c. coast they didnt want the windmill...it messes with thier view from their beach houses....
Posted Oct-2-2011 Bybuoymarker (598.70) 
buoymarker View Channel Send Message
(0)
@TheSanityInspector
Instead we should let oil companies drill everywhere they can make a profit from. And coddle Middle East nations that hate our guts for even more oil.
As for the birds....fak'em.
I'd rather see a bird getting blended in a wind turbine on my back yard than having toxic shit pumped out of it. With no regulations to the hold the companies accountable for anything they do.
Since when do conservatives give a rats ass about birds?
Posted Oct-2-2011 ByDrenigma (540.50) Drenigma View Channel Send Message
(0)
True.This wind Issue should be investigated.But why would you feel the need to defend something as big as a oil company???
Posted Oct-2-2011 Bywiderstehen (321.50) widerstehen View Channel Send Message
(1)
@widerstehen
Thats the question I have been trying to get answered for near 40 years.
Posted Oct-2-2011 ByDrenigma (540.50) Drenigma View Channel Send Message
(0)
Aren't they going to feel like fools when the autopsy reports show suicides.
Posted Oct-2-2011 Bytank2 (1144.38) 
tank2 View Channel Send Message
(1)
28 birds in 45 days? oh, i see its 28 birds in oil fields...absolutely no data fact based on wind turbine killing birds....
people like you are one mixed up group...basically, if its an eyesore type thing but no to oil rigs, no to wind turbines, no to 'dont block my view to the bay'....yep, seen you kind...they dont want the 'view' messed with from their mansion...
birds have amazing eyesight, ya think? they avoid the blades of a windmill...find another angle
Posted Oct-2-2011 Bybuoymarker (598.70) 
buoymarker View Channel Send Message
(0)
@buoymarker There is a lot of data on wind turbine bird deaths... seriously windows of buildings do about 50 million more per year at the low end.. You should research before making such bold comments. Please ask me for proof.
Posted Oct-2-2011 Bystevecore (819.18) stevecore View Channel Send Message
(0)
@stevecore link please
Posted Oct-2-2011 Bybuoymarker (598.70) 
buoymarker View Channel Send Message
(0)
@buoymarker
Being a wildlife biologist he is correct about bird mortality and wind farms. Data is also starting to show that they are problems for bats.
Posted Oct-2-2011 ByPeanutMM (184.92) PeanutMM View Channel Send Message
(0)
@stevecore i soley rely on LL'ers to inform me of the truth before i think....thank you..after reading a lil'...basically, its b.s...more birds die like ya said...thought thats what i said in the beginning...i dont see birds flying into motorcycles or cars...they try to avoid such moving targets...birds have a keen eyesight...
Posted Oct-2-2011 Bybuoymarker (598.70) 
buoymarker View Channel Send Message
(0)
@PeanutMM ya mean to tell me that a bat, who can pick-up the flight charactoristics of a dragon fly and swoop down and grab a meal...cannot pick-up the scent that a large moving object is coming near it at @60mph? b.s...not very often at all....wheres dat link? i rely soley on LL to base all my knowledge on...since everybody here is much smarter than me
Posted Oct-2-2011 Bybuoymarker (598.70) 
buoymarker View Channel Send Message
(-1)
In Soviet America, wind breaks you. At least if you are bird.
Posted Oct-2-2011 Bywellybub (353.68) 
wellybub View Channel Send Message
(0)
It must SUCK eating Tofu(tm) everyday of your miserable lives.
Posted Oct-2-2011 ByArizona_Patriot (3120.86) 
Arizona_Patriot View Channel Send Message
(-1)
I got about a paragraph through before I stopped reading. The BP spill... how many animals, and people are suffering the effects from that ONE event? Lets think kids... Its not just the big animals you see. Ecosystems are very sensitive. Kill off the very basic units and the whole system crashes. You are defending wind power over oil???? Sweet jesus christ. Shall I give you numbers on the impact oil does over wind?
Posted Oct-2-2011 Bystevecore (819.18) stevecore View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@stevecore
No thank you.
Who wants to read about what some limp wristed, lisping liberal has to say.
Anyways, who are we suppose to compete with?
Spain?
LOL!
Posted Oct-2-2011 ByArizona_Patriot (3120.86) 
Arizona_Patriot View Channel Send Message
(0)