Safe Mode: On
Evolution - from ape man to neanderthal

Around 200,000 years ago Neanderthals evolved in Europe and Eurasia. They shared 99.4% of their DNA with us and it was recently found that 1 to 4 percent of the genome for populations living outside of Africa is Neanderthal.

Neanderthals were expert hunters and were the inventors of the first spears. They often made tactical use of terrain features to gain as much advantage as possible, but administered the coup de grace with thrusting spears.

Neanderthals and modern humans found themselves competing across the European landscape 30,000 years ago. Although neanderthals had larger brains, humans had more sophisticated language and were great innovators able to adapt to every corner of the globe. This difference is what led to the extinction of neanderthals.

Loading the player ...
Embed Code
Plays: 1577 (Embed: 0)


http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21328470.400-into-the-mind-of-a-neanderthal.html?page=1http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=33f_1242591402


Added: Feb-24-2012 
By: CaptainsOrders
In:
Other Entertainment, Science and Technology, Other
Tags: ape men, neanderthals, ancient, humans, evolution
Marked as: approved
Views: 2137 | Comments: 92 | Votes: 1 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • I must be part Neanderthal because I'm always walking around semi-erect.

    Posted Feb-25-2012 By 

    (1)

  • lol
    ..."They may have been pretty ugly people actually"

    Posted Feb-24-2012 By 

    (0)

  • That was horrible.

    Posted Feb-24-2012 By 

    (0)

  • So Robert De Niro is a Neanderthal?

    pause it at 3:30 Oh ya, that's De Niro!

    Posted Feb-24-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Comment of user 'StopTheCancer' has been deleted by author!
  • Comment of user 'ReplicantDeckard' has been deleted by author!
  • Comment of user 'teotwawki' has been deleted by author!
    • @teotwawki magic? who knows? /shrug

      Posted Feb-24-2012 By 

      (0)

    • Comment of user 'teotwawki' has been deleted by author!
    • @teotwawki No, it's your IDEA of the "theory of natural selection that's incorrect: a mutation that is very harmful to the organism will be "selected out", over time, but one that causes neither a benefit NOR a loss will persist. You obviously quit studying biology (especially evolutionary biology) a long time ago, as the old creationist argument about the complexity of say, the eye, for example has been answered years ago. In a nutshell: and organism doesn't have to come up all a More..

      Posted Feb-24-2012 By 

      (0)

    • Comment of user 'teotwawki' has been deleted by author!
    • @teotwawki
      Read a few books written by Richard Dawkins...He goes into very great detail about what we know from the very beginnings of life...And a lot we know about evolution.

      Posted Feb-25-2012 By 

      (0)

  • With that Schnozz and the discovery of Neanderthal sites in the middle east, are Semites more Neanderthal than most?

    Posted Feb-24-2012 By 

    (0)

    • @DEADBEEF
      Modern Melanesians, Australian aboriginals, and Eurasians have some of the same DNA from either Denisova or Neanderthals.

      Posted Feb-25-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @CaptainsOrders

      You've got to be wrong about that!

      Australian Aborigines and Melanesians were first wave black people out of Africa. This was way before contact with Neanderthals in Europe.

      Subsequent waves out of Africa certainly had Neanderthal contact and genes. This includes the Asian migration through South East Asia and subsequently through Indonesia and out to the Pacific Islands.

      Posted Feb-25-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @DEADBEEF
      The evidence they have is genetic, I'm really not sure at what point in history they came in contact but -

      Between 4% and 6% of the genome from populations in Papua New Guinea and Bougainville Islands derives from a Denisovan population. They think they were introduced during the early migration of Melanesians into Southeast Asia.

      And Australian Aborigines share varying levels of Denisovan ancestry.

      As for Eurasians HLA alleles of modern Eurasians represent archaic HLA haplotypes l More..

      Posted Mar-8-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @CaptainsOrders

      Remember that black Papua New Guinea and Melanesians are not the only occupiers of those islands.

      The lowlanders in PNG are not Black. They derive from Asian migration as described - with some Black interbreeding.

      As I understand it Melanesians have a significant fraction of interbreeding with Asian passers by.

      Denisovian genes in Australian Aborigines - I can't comment with confidence but I'd find it very unlikely under any of the migration scenarios.

      Posted Mar-8-2012 By 

      (0)

  • Now, I am sure I learned that there were earlier species of human that used spears, before the Neanderthals. The kind that walked over 2 meters tall I think. Neanderthals were short and stocky. Unless I am wrong about this, the ones I'm thinking of lived in Europe before the last ice age, and were the first humans to live in Europe. Why does it feel weird to suggest that Homo Erectus invented the spear? But it may have been them, as I recall the spears were cut from spruce trees with stone axes, More..

    Posted Feb-25-2012 By 

    (0)

  • "The robust ape man became extinct." I'm not too sure about that. Mike Tyson springs to mind. I'm just saying... It's good to hear scientific terminology like "They probably..." and "I suspect..." in documentaries.

    Posted Feb-25-2012 By 

    (0)

  • I'm sure literary greats like the bible delve into this subject...

    Posted Feb-24-2012 By 

    (-1)

    • @LickMyDuck Synopsis of Genesis 1: first earth without form and void; then "let there be light" (BANG); then separation of land and water; then flora; then fish and birds; then mammals; then man (prehistoric). Does any of that remind you of anything?

      Notice there's no mention of Adam (modern man) in Genesis Chapter 1 because there was no Adam at that time, nor is there mention of how much later Adam arrived.

      Posted Feb-25-2012 By 

      (0)

  • This was considered flat-earth science over 100 years ago. There is *no* evidence for Darwinian macro evolution. The fossil record and micro biology are the *worst* witnesses for Darwinian macro evolution. DNA and what we know about the structure of a single cell alone nuked the atheist's flat earth dream a thousand times over. Mathematicians alone debunked the theory of Darwinian macro evolution and any theory of origins they've every dreamed up long ago as well. They are physically, mathematic More..

    Posted Feb-24-2012 By 

    (-1)

    • Evolution theory may not be perfect, but it's close to right. It's got nothing to do with religion it's proven fact.
      A few examples of 100% proof of evolution:
      Whales and dolphins used to be land mammals, but the evolved to water dwelling mammals, how do we know this? A whole range of reasons including vestigial back legs, the fact they still breath air and a lot of other stuff you probaply wouldn't understand.
      Then you've got weevils, are you aware they have evolved to feed only off man made pr More..

      Posted Feb-24-2012 By 

      (2)

    • Comment of user 'Common sense FTW' has been deleted by author!
    • @Roll1981 just for a laugh, please tell us how old the earth is, and provide some kind of evidence towards your theory. Besides the made up nonsense from the bible... We're all waiting.

      Posted Feb-24-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @Common sense FTW I think you should go on television as a an apologist for Darwinian evolution. ('Apologist' means you defend it.) Seriously.

      Posted Feb-24-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • @Common sense FTW When Jesus turned the water into wine the wine had evidence of age though it was created just then. God is sovereign in creation, providence, and grace. However old the Earth is (the Bible really doesn't say) it is certain God created it. And leave science to Christians. Since you atheists appropriated the scientific enterprise by taking over universities and research institutions and so on that Christians founded science has been stunted and corrupted ("post-normal scienc More..

      Posted Feb-24-2012 By 

      (-2)

  • So once upon a time a rock came to life, and sprouted a genome, then found another rock, that had come to life and also sprouted a genome, then they mated, as they also knew how to mate right?,and these are the parents of all life?...Duh!... it's just common sense right? Do u know stupid that sounds? Use some common sense for crying out loud.
    By the way, all effects have a cause, so what was the cause of all this? I know, nothing right?, give me a break!

    Posted Feb-24-2012 By 

    (-1)

    • @SturgeonMulie you know nothing.... Theres evidence of bacteria up to 3.8 billion years ago. Life started in the water. In fact it's a commonly believed theory now that life didn't start on earth, it came here via asteroids from another solar system.
      MATING ROCKS INDEED. Get your facts straight before making a fool of yourself.
      Science may not have all the answers but builds facts from investigation and trial and error.
      Religion gets it's belief from made up stories from thousands of years ago More..

      Posted Feb-25-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @SturgeonMulie "So once upon a time a rock came to life, and sprouted a genome..." That's exactly what happened. If you don't believe me just ask somebody in a smock who'd never had a real job in their life. Oh, I almost forgot, if you don't agree with me you're ignert 'cause I'm smart. I know everything. LOL :-;]

      Posted Feb-25-2012 By 

      (0)

  • Common sense, how can you fall for all that bs? The explanations get wilder and wilder, life hitched a ride on an astroid? how can life survive on an astroid? For thousands of light years, in space, you guys are so sure of things, no God for sure! but life came here through space, on an astroid...listen to yourself man, the things that science is trying to sell you, just doesn't make any common sense. where ever you think life began, either here or there they want you to believe it all started More..

    Posted Feb-25-2012 By 

    (-1)

  • Lets just start here sensi, sell me this: At one time there were these non living things, neither growing nor reproducing, then some things mixed around and got heated up then they came to life, on there own and started growing and reproducing, ok tell me how this makes sense.

    Posted Feb-25-2012 By 

    (-1)

    • @SturgeonMulie There is a lot of evidence for evolution but it does not explain the origins of life and it doesn't claim to. Evolution explains the diversity of life, not its origins.
      Scientists don't really have an answer for the origins of life. Simple folk like yourself say "aha then it must be God" when in fact it may simply be the fact that scientists don't know yet and need to keep researching. If you can't handle the fact that it is an unknown and the word God helps you out the More..

      Posted Feb-25-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @SturgeonMulie

      Why don't you read a few books written by Richard Dawkins...He goes into very great detail about what we know from the very beginnings of life.

      Posted Feb-25-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @SturgeonMulie I knew someone like you would be here all butthurt and calling people names. Have fun living in fear and ignorance.

      Posted Feb-25-2012 By 

      (0)