A former British special forces officer ran a US-backed private army to hunt down the Taliban in Pakistan in a secret war in 2003, a new book has revealed.
By Rob Crilly, Islamabad
6:00PM GMT 28 Nov 2012
Lieutenant Commander Howard Leedham, an ex-Royal Navy pilot, led a 25-strong force of specially-recruited Pakistani soldiers raiding Taliban camps, hunting down kidnap victims and detaining suspected al-Qaeda militants.
Eight years after leaving the country, Lt Cdr Leeham has broken his silence to describe a programme he believes offers a model for securing Pakistan’s porous borders against the militant threat.
While he was at work in the tribal badlands that border Afghanistan, the US State Department programme was a closely guarded secret — even from US and Pakistani officials. Under a one-year contract, Leedham was granted use of an American fleet of seven helicopters and two fixed-wing planes to conduct anti-terrorist operations in support of local troops from a base in Quetta, capital of the restive province of Baluchistan.
To do it he had to persuade a Pakistani general to allow him to recruit a handful of local Pathan soldiers.
“For a moment in time there was a group of Pathans, there were some Pakistani military officers, there were American mechanics, there was me,” he said, referring to the tough mountain tribesmen of north-western Pakistan.
RELATED ARTICLES
US to reduce Special Forces presence in Pakistan
26 May 2011[/*]
US special forces in northern Pakistan
01 Dec 2010[/*]
Reconstruction: air raid ruled out
02 May 2011[/*][/list]
“Did we break a few rules on the way? Yes. But if we didn’t, the people who would have got the advantage were the bad guys.”
The success of “the 25” as Lt Cdr Leedham’s force became known, meant it was first doubled in size and then scaled up into a multi-million dollar American and British training programme, which were halted only last year after the raid to kill Osama bin Laden.
Lt Cdr Leedham tells his story in a new book, Ask Forgiveness Not Permission.
He had left the British military — after a career as a helicopter pilot for Royal Marine Commando and what he coyly describes as “special forces type operations” — and was working with an executive air service in the US when he was approached to take over a failing State Department programme in Pakistan.
With resources focused on the war in Iraq during 2003, equipping his force was a question of begging, stealing and borrowing what was needed. Ration packs were sourced from US troops in Kabul. Smoke grenades were bartered from a contact at the British High Commission in return for seats on flights to Quetta.
The soldiers he worked with were recruited from the Frontier Corps, a paramilitary outfit with its roots in colonial India. But while the men knew the terrain they lacked commando training.
Lt Cdr Leedham taught the recruits the basics of desert warfare and gave an intense course in helicopter-borne assault techniques. The inspiration for his instructions came from the writings of Lawrence of Arabia.
“These guys really did perform,” said Lt Cdr Leedham. “I used a lot of Lawrence doctrine. I know it sounds a bit hokey but I did.”
At the time, local newspapers reported mysterious roadblocks on the main road from Pakistan to Kandahar, the spiritual home of the Taliban. They would disappear as soon as word spread, only to reappear elsewhere. Lt Cdr Leedham was briefed on an operation to move on a compound frequented by a “high-profile” suspect. He was never told the target and the plan was apparently vetoed by the US on legal grounds, but the book hints that it was a senior al-Qaeda figure, possibly even Osama bin Laden himself.
Lt Cdr Leedham returned to the US at the end of his one-year contract at the age of 46. Today he lives in London and works in the financial world.
The story will cause unease in Pakistan, where conspiracy theories circulate about secret Western forces running amok and where the US today uses a classified drone programme to hunt militants.
Lt Cdr Leedham said the model he used — small teams of local fighters with tight security protocols that prevent tip-offs to militant leaders — could still be used to hunt terrorists even as Western forces pull out of the region.
By: BekasKhan
In: Afghanistan
Tags: Afghanistan, Occupation, by, US, NATO, Taliban, Pakistan, terrorist, Punjabi, ISI, Al, Qaeda, Iran, Intel, India, Haqqani, Shia's, Hazaras
Location: Afghanistan (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 4651 | Comments: 63 | Votes: 1 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
The ABCs of fighting religious extremism created and supported by CIA and Paki-Punjabi ISI
-
Afghan extremists 'Pakistan terrorist Punjabi ISI=Al Qaeda' target scouting movement
-
Tough Questions May Signal US NATO Defeat With Quicker, Quieter End to Afghanistan War
-
India, Afghanistan for greater international cooperation against terrorism "Pakistan terrorist Punjabi ISI=Al Qaeda": Mukherjee
-
US should go after source of terror "Pakistan terrorist Punjabi ISI", says Karzai
-
British Lord Suggests Dropping A Nuke On Pakistan
-
Afghans protest against death sentence for soldier who killed French troops
-
US plans to keep 10,000 troops in Afghanistan post-pullout
-
India calls for rooting out terror syndicate "Paki-Punjabi-ISI" in Afghanistan
-
Our Opinion: Pakistan terrorist Punjabi ISI squanders Malala moment as U.S. stands idly by
-
Obama 'drone-warfare rulebook' condemned by human rights groups



get em boys
Posted Nov-28-2012 ByBu187 (2555.20) 
Bu187 View Channel Send Message
(3)
Interesting post, but how about a few less lines between paragraphs for the scrolling impaired? Thx.
Posted Nov-28-2012 Bylandsolo (378.70) 
landsolo View Channel Send Message
(2)
@landsolo.lol:O)
Posted Nov-28-2012 Bymoonshin (355.80) 
moonshin View Channel Send Message
(1)
Good work.
Posted Nov-28-2012 BySalmonellalover629 (542.70) 
Salmonellalover629 View Channel Send Message
(2)
Good work.
Like using Jack Russell terrier's for hunting rat's
Posted Nov-28-2012 ByDave556 (1957.26) 
Dave556 View Channel Send Message
(2)
Let's get 'em boys. Be safe out there.
Posted Nov-28-2012 ByHeavenlySedated (8.90) 
HeavenlySedated View Channel Send Message
(2)
@HeavenlySedated
If you really wanted them to be safe you wouldn't be encouraging them to put themselves in harm's way. WTF?
Regardless, do you really think the silly words of someone sitting safely in front of their computer really mean anything to the boys?
Posted Nov-29-2012 ByCujo1234 (176.60) 
Cujo1234 View Channel Send Message
(1)
@Cujo1234 I didnt encourage them to put them in harm's way. This is something they chose to do. My words may seem silly to you, but to someone else they can mean everything. Who are to be the judge of the value of my words? I appreciate the work they do and I absolutely will stand behind "the boys". It's because of them that I dont have to be out there and can sit safely behind my computer. They get hatred and criticism from people like you all the time. I'll be the type to let them kn More..
Posted Dec-2-2012 ByHeavenlySedated (8.90) 
HeavenlySedated View Channel Send Message
(0)
@HeavenlySedated
Yeah you did. You said to go get them, ...which requires putting themselves in harms way.
If you really supported the troops you should be against this war of nation building that is killing our troops and not making us any safer.
Posted Dec-8-2012 ByCujo1234 (176.60) 
Cujo1234 View Channel Send Message
(0)
whatever it takes, i support hunting down any muslim terrorist until they are all dead, no matter where they are.
Posted Nov-29-2012 ByValue343 (686.00)

Value343 View Channel Send Message
(1)
thank you to Lieutenant Commander Howard Leedham for a job well done.
Posted Nov-28-2012 Byfookalah (730.30) 
fookalah View Channel Send Message
(1)
We need more men and programs like the one he ran "Ask Forgiveness Not Permission"... I like that train of thought
Posted Nov-28-2012 Bykillingforgod (706.40) killingforgod View Channel Send Message
(1)
@killingforgod Everyone likes that way of thinking .... until they kill your son.
Posted Dec-21-2012 Bybingram (46.76) bingram View Channel Send Message
(0)
the Pakis are so bloody paranoid that they end up chasing, and biting,their own arses, they will beleive anything !!!
Posted Nov-28-2012 Bystorm_seal (268.90) 
storm_seal View Channel Send Message
(1)
Sounds like horse shit.
Posted Nov-28-2012 ByPmoney (203.26) 
Pmoney View Channel Send Message
(1)
Nails.
Kudos.
Hereford strikes again! Or perhaps Poole.
Posted Nov-29-2012 ByMalleus Maleficarum (111.70) 
Malleus Maleficarum View Channel Send Message
(0)
Good for us. This is an asymmetrical war requiring asymmetrical solutions. ROE's and other rubbish aren't going to win this long war.
Posted Nov-29-2012 Bytomd (49.72) 
tomd View Channel Send Message
(0)
@tomd Perhaps not, but ROEs make you look like a civilized nation waging a proper war.
Then again to be fair, that kinda went out the window when your boys started taking finger trophies off dead Afghan civies...
Posted Nov-30-2012 Byhellgremlin (763.12) hellgremlin Send Message
(0)
Bigger balls than me 'fo sure
Posted Dec-21-2012 Bybingram (46.76) bingram View Channel Send Message
(0)
There's something about the articles above which is sparking a debate in my head. It almost sounds too good to be true. By all means I'm immensly proud of our armed forces, but this just stinks of trying to sell his book. Not much information on the Internet about him either, so no news websites have written articles on this.
Sorry, I'll probably be thumbed down for it, but I call it how I see it.
Posted Nov-28-2012 BySamurai (85.40) 
Samurai View Channel Send Message
(0)
terrorists are bad
Posted Nov-29-2012 ByNATO POTATO (41.40) 
NATO POTATO View Channel Send Message
(0)