Safe Mode: On
New York honors China’s communist revolution that killed 72 million people

NEW YORK — New York is seeing red over the decision to turn the city's highest beacon — and one of America's symbols for free enterprise — into a shining monument honoring China's communist revolution Wednesday night.

The Empire State Building is set to be illuminated in red and yellow lights to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the bloody communist takeover.

The tower is lit in white most nights, but nearly every week gets splashed with color to honor holidays and heroes — red, white and blue for Independence Day, green for St. Patrick's Day, true blue for New York's Finest.

The building's managers say they have honored a host of countries, including Canada, India and Australia, but as of Wednesday that list of honorees now includes one of the world's last great authoritarian regimes.

Tourists were squirming as the city's 102-story landmark — which gained a special significance for New Yorker's after 9/11, when it again became Manhattan's tallest building — was being converted into a shining red beacon for Chinese communism.

"I think it's a bad idea," said Dick Paasch, 69, from Billings, Montana. "The Chinese Revolution ... in the years 1958-1960, there were something like 26 million people starved to death. Why would we want to celebrate something like that?

"I think the Chinese have come a long way since then, but I certainly wouldn't celebrate the revolution," he said.

Representatives for the building say it won't incur any extra costs to use the colored floodlights, so taxpayers won't have to pay a dime. But tourists thought it would have been better if the building would have stayed white this Wednesday.

"It seems a little out of place in New York City, an American city, having communist colors," said Cathy Crismore of Lancaster, California. "That doesn't seem right."

New York politicians have paid notice as well, and say they are let down by the light-up. Rep. Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y., said it was a mistake to pay tribute to what he called "a nation with a shameful history on human rights."

Historians of the revolution noted the unimaginable — and often forgotten — toll of the revolution and China's communist rule, which has taken tens of millions of lives through years of war, famine, reeducation and wholesale slaughter.

"China gets treatment that other dictatorships can only dream of — a free pass on human rights," said Arthur Waldron, a history professor at the University of Pennsylvania.

The revolution and its aftermath may have been deadlier than any world war: though estimates vary, research from the historian Chang Jung shows that as many as 72 million people died as a result.

During one five-year period alone, the Great Famine of 1958-1962, 36 million Chinese are believed to have starved as a result of Mao's Great Leap Forward, a government policy meant to industrialize the nation.

During those years of ruin, peasants ate bark, maggots, bird droppings, human flesh — anything to survive — as government storehouses stood full with grain and other cereals, neither the first nor last in China's troubled line of violations of human rights.

"China remains strongly oppressive — but we make a lot of money, and we have a tendency to romanticize the country, confusing her brilliant cultural heritage with the current communist regime," said Waldron. "Will we light it in honor of Tibet?"

About 40 protesters massed outside the Empire State Building Wednesday morning as China's New York consul attended a ceremony the building's managers said was to honor "the 1.3 billion Chinese people and the 60th anniversary of their country."

"Because the Empire State Building is such a cultural icon ... this touches a chord close to home for people," said Lhadon Tethong, a leader of the demonstrators from Students for a Free Tibet.

Tethong said that the lights on the building "are a symbol of support for the Chinese state — for a totalitarian state," which ignores the country's "abominable record on human rights, on liberty."

Waldron, of the University of Pennsylvania, said he thought there would be an outcry if another brutal regime were so honored by the tower.

"Would we have lit the Empire State Building for the USSR knowing what we do about the Gulag?"


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,557823,00.html


Added: Sep-30-2009 Occurred On: Sep-29-2009
By: kelly110
In:
News
Tags: Empire, State, Building, china, communist, revolution
Marked as: approved
Views: 9266 | Comments: 29 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • What else would you expect from a liberal bastian.

    Posted Sep-30-2009 By 

    (4)

  • Very sad,
    I will have to now tell my children
    "I saw our government sell our soverenty, I lived here before the two major political parties sold us out to foreign countries and illegal immigrants. That my sons is why we now live in the United States of Nothing"

    very sad.................

    Posted Sep-30-2009 By 

    (3)

  • What do you expect from a state that has continuously voted communist for decades.

    Posted Sep-30-2009 By 

    (3)

  • Pretty F'd up,ha. Heard that was coming, on Savage nation monday night.

    Posted Sep-30-2009 By 

    (2)

  • What do you expect??? With Bloomberg's grandiose vision of New York placing lawn chairs in Times Square, and with the prophet bowing before America-hating Saudi islamists could it have been far behind that the symbol of America's great industrialization lays itself before the horrors of Mao?

    Posted Sep-30-2009 By 

    (2)

  • Comment of user 'Zardoz86' has been deleted by moderator!
  • Who authorize and approved this? Who own the Empire State Building? Doesn't the Mayor aware of this? How about the NY Senators?
    This is a disgrace to America. I guess China owning us now.

    Posted Sep-30-2009 By 

    (1)

  • Well thats the last time this american visits new york. FREE TIBET, SHAME ON YOU NEW YORK!

    Posted Oct-1-2009 By 

    (1)

  • nothing like a country praising the communist!

    Posted Sep-30-2009 By 

    (1)

  • fREE TIBET

    Posted Oct-1-2009 By 

    (1)

  • BUT, BUT, BUT THEY WERE 72 MILLION "CHINESE!"

    Posted Sep-30-2009 By 

    (1)

  • Fuck China.

    Posted Sep-30-2009 By 

    (1)

  • Actually, as dysfunctional as communism is, it didn't kill all those people. Having uneducated peasants whose mental capacity was seriously questionable running the country is what killed those people. Most of them died due to astronomically stupid government policies which weren't necessarily communist.

    Posted Sep-30-2009 By 

    (0)

    • goverment policies = communist policies

      Posted Oct-1-2009 By 

      (0)

    • True, most of these policies had their basis in Communist ideology. But the point I'm trying to make is that one of the main reasons they were so devastating was that for the most part, the people implementing them were uneducated peasants. These people had no idea what they were doing and they had neither the mental capacity nor the sociological expertise to understand the consequences of their actions. Early Communist China is an excellent example of the ramifications of having a country run b More..

      Posted Oct-1-2009 By 

      (0)

    • You are correct on some points, but not others. The khmer rouge would be a perfect example of uneducated retards running amuk, but history has proven that the more educated can kill just as easily, but with more intentional and discrete methods. The mass extermination by both soviets and nazi's are perfect examples. We Americans think more highly of the Chinese for one reason only. They have embraced Capatilism, which is why they make such excellent trading partners. But dont let that fool you. More..

      Posted Oct-4-2009 By 

      (0)

  • If we want China to extend our credit lines by another 500 billion dollars, the gov has to bend over and take it in the ass. Changing some light bulbs seems more feasible over doing something hard, like changing our spending habits.

    Posted Oct-1-2009 By 

    (0)

  • Comment of user 'rclark951' has been deleted by author!