The 18 Most Suppressed Inventions Ever
from yt, but still worth a peek
Added: Aug-3-2012
By: Yogsoggoth
In: Other Entertainment
Tags: technology, you can't have it
Marked as: approved
Views: 3949 | Comments: 80 | Votes: 4 | Favorites: 7 | Shared: 17 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
By: Yogsoggoth
In: Other Entertainment
Tags: technology, you can't have it
Marked as: approved
Views: 3949 | Comments: 80 | Votes: 4 | Favorites: 7 | Shared: 17 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
Items
-
Muddy Waters (1913-1983)-You Can't Lose What You Ain't Never Had (1964)
-
Wow another cure for cancer you can't have.
-
YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE CRAZY TO BE A DEMOCRAT, BUT IT HELPS
-
You Can't Say That
-
Ron Paul's Fans Can't Have It Both Ways
-
You Can;t make this stuff up
-
You can't count on god for jack!
-
We Can't Make It Here Anymore
-
SACRAMENTO, CA - You Can't Run From The Cops With A Car On Your Head - 07-30-07
-
You Can't Beat Good Quality Clothing?
-
Drivers Can't Make it up Icey Hill - Funny
-
Obama’s Envoy to Islamic World: “There’s Things You Can Say About Islam That You Can’t Say About Other Religions”…
Advertisers



A lot of ridiculous conspiracy theory. The electric car the water powered car and Tesla's magic wizardry free energy completely kill the credibility of this video.
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByST0N3PONY (4992.42) 
ST0N3PONY View Channel Send Message
(4)
The 19th was the bullshit detector I invented. It would be going off like crazy now...
Posted Aug-3-2012 Byonepercent (702.60) 
onepercent View Channel Send Message
(4)
@onepercent
Your comment has me roaring with laughter! Good one.
Posted Aug-3-2012 Byskyhawk53 (901.58) 
skyhawk53 View Channel Send Message
(1)
@onepercent
And what do you feel was bullshit?
Im sure some of them were not fully functioning inventions, but... well ok....
Agreed.... but not all were bullshit....
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByCatJuggler (337.90) 
CatJuggler View Channel Send Message
(0)
i can tell its going to be 1 of those videos full of miss infomation and bullshit. so ill start with the first thing i saw. suppression of electric cars is bullshit. battery technology its miles more expensive than digging oil out of the ground. to generate electricity coal or nuclear fuel is usually burned. its not sustainable and batterys are heavy and crap. we are constantley working on new batterys and when the day comes when a battery weighs a few kilos and holds enough energy to drive 200 More..
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByTomThumb (138.94) TomThumb View Channel Send Message
(3)
@TomThumb
It went 70-80 miles per charge which was good enough for the people who currently had those EV1's leased to them in California.
None were allowed to buy them, at the end of it all they had their cars taken despite the fact that they raised enough money to buy them(the community to which these cars were released) but the company still smashed them to bits.
What was wrong with letting them keep it? They had the money.
I feel you on the battery issue though I even heard of the length More..
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByPointBlank (47.90) 
PointBlank View Channel Send Message
(1)
Lets Go FURTHUR, just on #1.
The electric car existed PRE 1900.
That's right. The electric car was in use in the late 1890's. You would pull up to a service station, swap batteries, and be on your way. Before the 1920s, electric automobiles were competing with petroleum-fueled cars for urban use of a quality service car. The Oil industry helped the Gas Car Industry by Under-pricing their cars so they could in time have more gas cars out than electric cars. They lost tons of money doing it, but More..
Posted Aug-3-2012 Bynewton (254.20) 
newton View Channel Send Message
(3)
@newton
- Nice, nice, nice! Thanks, for sharing that info!
Posted Aug-4-2012 ByIamCanadian (404.30) 
IamCanadian View Channel Send Message
(2)
thanks interesting clip.
Posted Aug-3-2012 Byfookalah (701.90) 
fookalah View Channel Send Message
(3)
Interesting.
Posted Aug-3-2012 Bypaperboy (293.10) 
paperboy View Channel Send Message
(3)
Automakers don't suppress high mileage cars. The US government does because it taxes gasoline by the gallon. A car in Europe that gets 60 MPG has the same model in the US rated at 35 MPG because the cars have been intentionally detuned to meet bullshit "emission standards" even though, if the car got 65 MPG, it would pollute less.
The US government if fucking up the US at light speed.
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByTheMule (1246.30) TheMule View Channel Send Message
(2)
@TheMule cars in hotter climates are tuned to push in more fuel so the engine dont burn out as quick moron.
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByTomThumb (138.94) TomThumb View Channel Send Message
(-1)
1) Ev1 was an experiment.
2) Street car's don't scale.
3) 100per gallon car.. Nothing's free including mileage.
you have to give up something, be that speed, safety, comfort.
4) the free power thing is interesting.. but if it were practical to transmit power in this way we would be doing it.
5) well the rules on pot are turning around.
6) all you doing in a "water powered car" is extracting hydrogen from water.
which is not a fast process. it requires lot's of heat, a chemical react More..
Posted Aug-3-2012 Bypiyoti (223.32) 
piyoti View Channel Send Message
(2)
@piyoti
"So I really doubt any of the clams are true.."
You may be on to something here! I had clams for dinner last night and I woke up this morning feeling really hungry...
Posted Aug-3-2012 Bypauliec17 (945.58)

pauliec17 View Channel Send Message
(0)
1:45!!!!
NOVA SCOTIA BABY!!!!
Its sad that big companies (gm for example) screw the world for the sake of making money.
GO NOVA SCOTIA!!!!
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByCatJuggler (337.90) 
CatJuggler View Channel Send Message
(2)
My uncle worked for GM, fact #1 is absolutely true... GM lobbied out...
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByILovePickles (429.36) 
ILovePickles View Channel Send Message
(2)
Lifting restriction on the growth of hemp would revitalize the US economy. We would be able to produce the cheapest, most high quality textiles, energy and vegetable protein in the world.
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByCannibalsCookpot (378.20) 
CannibalsCookpot View Channel Send Message
(2)
@CannibalsCookpot Bthis h been known for decades... Industrial hemp Can replace everything but glass in your home.
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByAnoNYman (7.30) AnoNYman View Channel Send Message
(2)
@AnoNYman So then you agree, this is suppressed technology.
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByCannibalsCookpot (378.20) 
CannibalsCookpot View Channel Send Message
(1)
@CannibalsCookpot I do. I have 2 copies of the Popular Mechanics from FEB 1938 touting it as the NEW BILLION DOLLAR CROP, the article explains it's 1000's of uses. But, the guys with the money (power) won. No hemp for you!
Posted Aug-3-2012 Bynewton (254.20) 
newton View Channel Send Message
(1)
Watched about 1/3 of it, BS.
I really like where they insinuate that someone.. either the government or big oil somehow managed to cause the inventor of the 100mpg water powered car to have a brain aneurysm
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByNothingisfree (350.70) 
Nothingisfree View Channel Send Message
(1)
@Nothingisfree Yeah, the beauty of conspiracy theory is that you can just make any bullshit claim and call it true.
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByST0N3PONY (4992.42) 
ST0N3PONY View Channel Send Message
(2)
@ST0N3PONY
Yea, and anyone who doubts you is either in on it, or just misinformed..
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByNothingisfree (350.70) 
Nothingisfree View Channel Send Message
(1)
was the JP Morgan "chasing" away other investors intended?
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByCocoaCrisp (33.30) CocoaCrisp View Channel Send Message
(1)
about 2/3 BS but some of it is very well documented. The VW Lupo did not get to 99/gal but it does get 78 MPG!! They had a concept car that never made it to production that was soposed to get much better than that.
Posted Aug-3-2012 Bywheelbaron (61.98) 
wheelbaron View Channel Send Message
(1)
@wheelbaron yeap. The US won't allow it for 2 reasons (they claim) 1 it's 10% more polluting per gal (which means it's only 55% as polluting per mile as existing diesels) The second was that they couldn't maintain the roads with fuel effiecent cars because they wouldn't get as much money from fuel taxes. You think they could add some taxes to the fuel to fix the last one.
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByAariss (381.82) 
Aariss View Channel Send Message
(0)
They forgot the Tin-foil Hat! :)
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByStovepipe (298.70) 
Stovepipe View Channel Send Message
(1)