I am not saying that all or any of these pictures are fake, but having spent several years as a computer graphics artist I could replicate any of these pictures in a matter of minutes.
There used to be a saying, that went "The camera never lies"
This all changed with the very badly composed 'Cottingley fairies in 1907'.
Quoted comment by 24038462: I am not saying that all or any of these pictures are fake, but having spent several years as a computer graphics artist I could replicate any of these pictures in a matter of minutes.
There used to be a saying, that went "The camera never lies"
This all changed with the very badly composed 'Cottingley fairies in 1907'.
The only problem with any photos of 'ghosts', is that without any other evidence to corroborate the event, they are nothing more than interesting pics.
To be even slightly considerable as 'proof', there would need to be at least one or two other sources of data (same pic from another camera at the same time, recorded spike on an EMF meter, voice recordings) captured at the same moment as any of the images shown.
Quoted comment by 24038462: I am not saying that all or any of these pictures are fake, but having spent several years as a computer graphics artist I could replicate any of these pictures in a matter of minutes.
There used to be a saying, that went "The camera never lies"
This all changed with the very badly composed 'Cottingley fairies in 1907'.
I think you are saying they're fake. But, don't feel bad... you're right.
I didn't say they were fake. I just didn't say they were real.
I would need to see much higher resolution images, but even if any of them are real is still doesn't say it was of a supernatural origin.
Comments - sort by newest to oldest
Holy crap! That was MJ at 3:10
Posted Jul-11-2009 by "woodrat" (R)
great Ill never get to sleep now
Posted Jul-11-2009 by "brako" (R)
Talk dirty to me.. Please.
Posted Jul-11-2009 by "Maxisminion" (R)
Spooky Missy.
Posted Jul-11-2009 by "Boogliosi" (R)
Gee, someone just bought "Photoshop for Dummies" and has gotten decent at it pretty quick.
Posted Jul-11-2009 by "tonkoo" (R)
The real question is, why are people taking pictures of such wierd things/places?
Posted Jul-11-2009 by "sins07" (R)
LOL!..
win comment.. have a cookie.
Posted Jul-11-2009 by "MissyVenom" Premium
lol
Posted Jul-11-2009 by "wallyonline" (B)
mud, pig, cheezy feet, crotch rot.
Now you're turning him on ;)
Posted Jul-11-2009 by "Travis1975" (R)
I am not saying that all or any of these pictures are fake, but having spent several years as a computer graphics artist I could replicate any of these pictures in a matter of minutes.
There used to be a saying, that went "The camera never lies"
This all changed with the very badly composed 'Cottingley fairies in 1907'.
http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://hauntedamericatours.com/Fairies/cottingley.jpg&imgrefurl=http://hauntedamericatours.com/Fairies/FairyRocks.php&h=459&w=600&sz=148&tbnid=cDYxeyXZz3uq7M:&tbnh=103&tbnw=135&prev=/images%3Fq%3DCottingley%2BFairies&usg=__e6RjDMLhVvO0gvqxy2zOUcQj0BI=&ei=NvpYSvSpJMbMjAe3qsgb&sa=X&oi=image_result&resnum=4&ct=image
Posted Jul-11-2009 by "24038462" (R)
And they all pose for the camera too.... amazing.
Posted Jul-11-2009 by "Trenz" (R)
I thought I saw MJ at 1:25?
Great vid Missy! Voted!
xxpapaxx
Posted Jul-11-2009 by "papapang2007" Premium
There used to be a saying, that went "The camera never lies"
This all changed with the very badly composed 'Cottingley fairies in 1907'.
http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://hauntedamericatours.com/Fairies/cottingley.jpg&imgrefurl=http://hauntedamericatours.com/Fairies/FairyRocks.php&h=459&w=600&sz=148&tbnid=cDYxeyXZz3uq7M:&tbnh=103&tbnw=135&prev=/images%3Fq%3DCottingley%2BFairies&usg=__e6RjDMLhVvO0gvqxy2zOUcQj0BI=&ei=NvpYSvSpJMbMjAe3qsgb&sa=X&oi=image_result&resnum=4&ct=image
I think you are saying they're fake. But, don't feel bad... you're right.
Posted Jul-11-2009 by "Trenz" (R)
Some of those were slightly interesting.
The only problem with any photos of 'ghosts', is that without any other evidence to corroborate the event, they are nothing more than interesting pics.
To be even slightly considerable as 'proof', there would need to be at least one or two other sources of data (same pic from another camera at the same time, recorded spike on an EMF meter, voice recordings) captured at the same moment as any of the images shown.
Posted Jul-11-2009 by "harlock69" (R)
There used to be a saying, that went "The camera never lies"
This all changed with the very badly composed 'Cottingley fairies in 1907'.
http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://hauntedamericatours.com/Fairies/cottingley.jpg&imgrefurl=http://hauntedamericatours.com/Fairies/FairyRocks.php&h=459&w=600&sz=148&tbnid=cDYxeyXZz3uq7M:&tbnh=103&tbnw=135&prev=/images%3Fq%3DCottingley%2BFairies&usg=__e6RjDMLhVvO0gvqxy2zOUcQj0BI=&ei=NvpYSvSpJMbMjAe3qsgb&sa=X&oi=image_result&resnum=4&ct=image
I think you are saying they're fake. But, don't feel bad... you're right.
I didn't say they were fake. I just didn't say they were real.
I would need to see much higher resolution images, but even if any of them are real is still doesn't say it was of a supernatural origin.
Posted Jul-11-2009 by "24038462" (R)