Safe Mode: On
Armada of US naval power massing in the Gulf as Israel prepares an Iran strike



An armada of US and British naval power is massing in the Persian Gulf in the belief that Israel is considering a pre-emptive strike against Iran’s covert nuclear weapons programme.

Battleships, aircraft carriers, minesweepers and submarines from 25 nations are converging on the strategically important Strait of Hormuz in an unprecedented show of force as Israel and Iran move towards the brink of war.

Western leaders are convinced that Iran will retaliate to any attack by attempting to mine or blockade the shipping lane through which passes around 18 million barrels of oil every day, approximately 35 per cent of the world’s petroleum traded by sea.

A blockade would have a catastrophic effect on the fragile economies of Britain, Europe the United States and Japan, all of which rely heavily on oil and gas supplies from the Gulf.

The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world’s most congested international waterways. It is only 21 miles wide at its narrowest point and is bordered by the Iranian coast to the north and the United Arab Emirates to the south.

In preparation for any pre-emptive or retaliatory action by Iran, warships from more than 25 countries, including the United States, Britain, France, Saudi Arabia and the UAE, will today begin an annual 12-day exercise.

The war games are the largest ever undertaken in the region.

They will practise tactics in how to breach an Iranian blockade of the strait and the force will also undertake counter-mining drills.

The multi-national naval force in the Gulf includes three US Nimitz class carrier groups, each of which has more aircraft than the entire complement of the Iranian air force.

The carriers are supported by at least 12 battleships, including ballistic missile cruisers, frigates, destroyers and assault ships carrying thousand of US Marines and special forces.

The British component consists of four British minesweepers and the Royal Fleet Auxiliary Cardigan Bay, a logistics vessel. HMS Diamond, a brand-new £1billion Type 45 destroyer, one of the most powerful ships in the British fleet, will also be operating in the region.

In addition, commanders will also simulate destroying Iranian combat jets, ships and coastal missile batteries.

In the event of war, the main threat to the multi-national force will come from the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps navy, which is expected to adopt an “access-denial” strategy in the wake of an attack, by directly targeting US warships, attacking merchant shipping and mining vital maritime chokepoints in the Persian Gulf.

Defence sources say that although Iran’s capability may not be technologically sophisticated, it could deliver a series of lethal blows against British and US ships using mini-subs, fast attack boats, mines and shore-based anti-ship missile batteries.

Next month, Iran will stage massive military manoeuvres of its own, to show that it is prepared to defend its nuclear installations against the threat of aerial bombardment.

The exercise is being showcased as the biggest air defence war game in the Islamic Republic’s history, and will be its most visible response yet to the prospect of an Israeli military strike.

Using surface-to-air missiles, unmanned drones and state-of-the-art radar, Iran’s Revolutionary Guards and air force will combine to test the defences of 3,600 sensitive locations throughout the country, including oil refineries and uranium enrichment facilities.

Brigadier General Farzad Esmaili, commander of the Khatam al-Anbiya air defence base, told a conference this month that the manoeuvres would “identify vulnerabilities, try out new tactics and practise old ones”.

At the same time as the Western manoeuvres in the Gulf, the British Response Task Forces Group — which includes the carrier HMS Illustrious, equipped with Apache attack helicopters, along with the French aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle - will be conducting a naval exercise in the eastern Mediterranean. The task force could easily be diverted to the Gulf region via the Suez Canal within a week of being ordered to do so.

The main naval exercise comes as President Barack Obama is scheduled to meet Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, today to discuss the Iranian crisis.

Many within the Obama administration believe that Israel will launch a pre-emptive strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities before the US presidential elections, an act which would signal the failure of one of Washington’s key foreign policy objectives.

Both Downing Street and Washington hope that the show of force will demonstrate to Iran that Nato and the West will not allow President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian leader, to develop a nuclear armoury or close Hormuz.

Sir John Sawers, the head of MI6, the Secret Intelligence Service, reportedly met the Israeli prime minister and Ehud Barak, his defence secretary, two weeks ago in an attempt to avert military action against Iran.

But just last week Mr Netanyahu signalled that time for a negotiated settlement was running out when he said: “The world tells Israel 'Wait, there’s still time.’ And I say, 'Wait for what? Wait until when?’

“Those in the international community who refuse to put red lines before Iran don’t have a moral right to place a red light before Israel.”

The crisis hinges on Iran’s nuclear enrichment programme, which Israel believes is designed to build an atomic weapon. Tehran has long argued that the programme is for civil use only and says it has no plans to an build a nuclear bomb, but that claim has been disputed by the West, with even the head of MI6 stating that the Islamic Republic is on course to develop atomic weapons by 2014.

The Strait of Hormuz has long been disputed territory, with the Iranians claiming control of the region and the entire Persian Gulf.

Rear Admiral Ali Fadavi of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps recently boasted that “any plots of enemies” would be foiled and a heavy price exacted, adding: “We determine the rules of military conflict in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz.”

But Leon Panetta, the US defence secretary, warned that Iranian attempts to exercise control over the Strait of Hormuz could be met with force.

He said: “The Iranians need to understand that the United States and the international community are going to hold them directly responsible for any disruption of shipping in that region — by Iran or, for that matter, by its surrogates.”

Mr Panetta said that the United States was “fully prepared for all contingencies” and added: “We’ve invested in capabilities to ensure that the Iranian attempt to close down shipping in the Gulf is something that we are going to be able to defeat if they make that decision.”

That announcement was supported by Philip Hammond, the Defence Secretary, who added: “We are determined to work as part of the international community effort to ensure freedom of passage in the international waters of the Strait of Hormuz.”

One defence source told The Sunday Telegraph last night: “If it came to war, there would be carnage. The Iranian casualties would be huge but they would be able to inflict severe blows against the US and British.

“The Iranian Republican Guard are well versed in asymmetrical warfare and would use swarm attacks to sink or seriously damage ships. This is a conflict nobody wants, but the rhetoric from Israel is unrelenting.”----

Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/9545597/Armada-of-British-naval-power-massing-in-the-Gulf-as-Israel-prepares-an-Iran-strike.html


Added: Sep-16-2012 Occurred On: Sep-16-2012
By: MB-UK
In:
World News, Politics, Iran, Other Middle East
Tags: usa, uk, france, iran, israel, naval, armada, strait, hormuz, war, tensions, strike
Marked as: approved
Views: 5087 | Comments: 152 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 203 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • The time for talking is over. Why wait until Iran has developed a weapon ?

    Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

    (3)

    • @b0redj0rd
      I guess you're right.

      Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @lucidx1
      The arab spring is due to tsunami Iranian shores next year with a presidential election.

      Another 'stolen election' and maybe this time the new commander and chief will speak up.
      Unlike oBama who ignored the violence in Iran at the last stolen election riots.

      Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

      (0)

  • I never believe these reports, if there was a preemptive strike we would hear about it AFTER it happened

    Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

    (3)

  • Well bugger me, this story again. Every damn year. 25 ships? Wow. You do realise the US 5th Fleet is based in Bahrain right? I have just got back from a 9 month deployment in the Gulf. We go back and forth through the straits every couple of weeks. We train in MCM throughout the year. Massing my arse, seriously. Another slow news day at the Telegraph again by a journalist who knows fuck all about what we and our coalition colleagues do out there all year round. It winds me up.

    Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

    (3)

  • What would israel be without the US, TOTAL SHIT

    Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

    (2)

  • The French? Going to war? Two words you never hear in the same sentence when it comes to the French. Lets hope they packed loads of white bed linen, so at the first sign of trouble they can hoist it up the main-sail and scarper!

    Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

    (2)

  • Yeah, all this crap with Obama, and netanyahu, is false flag. The persians already figured it out, though.

    Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

    (1)

  • let the good times roll

    Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

    (1)

  • There are no more battleships.......anywhere ......

    Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

    (1)

    • @just_crsn47
      shhh
      They are on a roll,
      let them foam at the mouth

      Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @just_crsn47
      Actually, there are still 4 Iowa class that actually could be put back in service in about 6 months. In fact, new barrels and liners for the guns on all of them are still in the inventory and the ones in place are at least 95%, and ammo for the big and small guns is still in the ammo supplies and maintained and inspected routinely. The powerplants for the iowas are still fully functional. It would take about 3 days to inspect them, do some PM and fire them up. The analog computers More..

      Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @grunt sorry not commissioned anywhere

      Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @just_crsn47
      Not commisioned. Museum ships that the Navy still own and require certain areas be inviolate or maintained unaltered, like the engine rooms, guns and turrets, ballistic computers, generators, etc. Norfolk could get the New Jersey back sailing and firing missiles and guns in a few months.

      Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

      (0)

  • This will shape up to be the largest military operation since world war 2. Iran and hate monger muslims will rue the day, EXTREME RUEAGE! Remember what the crazy, honey badger Americans did to Japan? Thats nothing compared to what the DOD has in store for Iran.

    Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

    (1)

  • I wish USA would drill baby drill their own oil.

    Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

    (1)

  • If they go ahead with this, they (NATO) need to make sure that the military is ready to intervene in their own countries aswell against domestic muslim nutcases. A few helicopters with 30mm cannons would definately be needed for flash mob muslims with the intent to kill.

    Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

    (1)

  • here we go folks...war is almost here

    Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

    (1)

    • @ticklemygooch we have been at war for years. iraq afghanistan you forgot. between this and china/japan things are warming up for ww3

      Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @scottishcrusader

      I think we might be on japans side this time.

      also i thnk the japerknees have been developing robots for an all out attack against the chinese.

      fucking battlestar galactica.

      Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @scottishcrusader i didnt' forget those "wars", but Iran would be a real war. Military versus military. Not a bunch of sand bandits hiding in holes.

      Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @phobeus More like "Gundam vs. the Red army" Guess whos gonna lose? :)

      Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @phobeus

      you can't be against china. you owe them too much money.

      Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

      (0)

  • here's the plan:

    1. Annoy Iranians by having western/regional allies joint execise, to get them nice and riled up. Hopefully they'll retaliate by claiming to speed up their "nuclear ambition". Atleast that's the version we will get from western media.

    2. Some time later have the jews attack Iran to put an end to said ambition via means of a preemptive strike. despite the fact that preemptive warfare is banned by the Geneva convention.
    The jews will claim they had no choice, the Irani More..

    Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

    (1)

  • I was floating around in the Arabian Sea with a marine BLT waiting to attack Silkworm Cruise Missile sites on the Straights of Hormuz in 1980. Do you really think Jimmy Carter II is gonna do anything? If Obama can gather a coolition of the willing to lead from behind maybe they will sweep a few mines again, but that's it.

    Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Dont stop at Iran....

    Posted Sep-17-2012 By 

    (0)