Safe Mode: On
Obama Romney Debate: Romney Corrected By Host For Lying About Libyan Attack

Loading the player ...
Embed CodeSwitch Player
Plays: 514 (Embed: 0)


















and a bonus


Added: Oct-16-2012 Occurred On: Oct-16-2012
By: KutKorners
In:
Propaganda
Tags: when, a, mormon, lies, does, he, take, off, his, magic, underwear, before, doing, so
Location: United States (load item map)
Views: 1734 | Comments: 173 | Votes: 7 | Favorites: 2 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
'
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • The "host" is just another Obammunist liar

    Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

    (7) | Report

  • It was sooo goood!

    Benghazi

    Energy

    Gas Prices

    Food Stamps

    Fast and Furious

    North Dakota

    The View

    et-friggin-cetera.

    I _almost_ feel sorry for zer-0.

    If zer-0 wasn't such a filty piece of marxist shit, and if nis record wasn't such a complete epic fail, I'd cut him a bit of slack.

    Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

    (7) | Report

    • @Rousing Sermon: Boohoo. Crybaby.

      Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

      (-2) | Report

    • @gitsum

      Yes, you have a good point, but you still gotta feel a little bit sorry for him.

      Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

      (-2) | Report

    • @Rousing Sermon

      Oops I forgot:

      The Economy

      Jobs

      Investments in China & Virgin Islands

      Having the moderator incorrectly stick up for you

      Gotta be more. Zer-0 lost on the content of every single point made tonight. Romney nailed zer-0 again tonight but bad.

      Was there even one single topic zer-0 didn't lose on?

      Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • Comment of user 'leakinghole' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • First of all, it's inappropriate for the moderator to act on behalf of either participant. Secondly, she looks like even more of an ass because she was wrong.

    Obama said exactly "No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for". He did not call the Libya assassination an act of terror.

    In fact, on both "The View" and "David Letterman", he was asked if the attacks we More..

    Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

    (6) | Report

  • Well, I agree with you about the boobs... and I'm not talking about the two debating in the video.

    Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

    (4) | Report

  • Nice to see this placed in propaganda, exactly where it belongs.

    Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

    (4) | Report

  • "act of terror" does not denote that the act was by terrorists.

    2 weeks to finally admit it was a coordinated attack by terrorists.

    Multi-Billion dollar intelligence agency and it takes them 2 weeks to finally announce that it was a coordinated attack by terrorists.

    Romney was right from the start, the moderator even admits after Obama's statement that Romney was still on the ball.

    Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

    (4) | Report

  • The terror attacks were in reference to 9/11 not Libya. He then went on the View and the Letterman show and said "we are still looking into it". Nice try

    Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

    (3) | Report

  • MMMMMIITTTTEEEENNNNNSSS YYOOOOUUU AAAAAREEEE SSTTTTUTTTERRRRINGGG TTTOOOO MUCCCCHCHHH

    Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

    (3) | Report

  • Again, Obama got made to look like a fool!

    Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

    (3) | Report

  • Who's the liar? Oh, it's Obummer and his CNN libtard hack moderator. Strange.

    http://twitchy.com/2012/10/16/and-now-cnn-walks-back-false-act-of-terror-fact-check/

    Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

    (3) | Report

    • @The_Jason Next time do not rely on twitchy.com for your news dumbass.

      Obama said exactly "No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for".

      So yeah bitch there you go

      Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

      (-2) | Report

    • @TEXAS HOLDEM123

      Texas is holding 'em....Obama's nuts.
      So yeah bitch there you go

      Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • Candy actually came out and said Romney was right.......

    Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

    (3) | Report

  • "An act of terror" does not admit in any way that it was an act conducted by terrorist.

    2 weeks until officially accepted and said that it was a coordinated attack by terrorists.

    During those 2 weeks the excuse was a violent protest in retaliation to the video.
    Then terrorists protesting in retaliation to the video.
    Then finally that it was a pre-coordinated attack by terrorists.

    Rice, Clinton and Obama have all been on record claiming that the attack was in retaliation to the Y More..

    Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

    (2) | Report

    • @newvalor
      The thing is both the violence over the video AND the attack on the consulate HAPPENED ON THE SAME DAY. So yeah, why wouldn't you be unclear as to what caused Chris Stevens death initially?

      Maybe they could've realized it abit quicker the few days after, but still practically everyone on Liveleak were lambasting Muslims over getting angry at a video and killing and rioting as a result of it.

      And much like solving a normal murder case, sometimes it takes a while for the all the fact More..

      Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

      (2) | Report

    • @newvalor - agreed... i found the same info thru simple 'research' of non-msm...

      Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

      (-1) | Report

    • @John_Matrix
      It's a good point you have. But here's the issue. We have multi-billion dollars in intel gathering and collecting, to include even live feed gathering. Yes somebody was actually watching as this was going down, to add that they had reports beforehand that all was calm and clear.

      But to go out and say that it was due to a video, all the while stating you are looking into is not the best political method to ensuring how to respond to the situation. Especially with going in front on More..

      Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @newvalor: A terrorist is anyone who commits an "act of terror". Would you like to question what the meaning of "is" is?

      Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @newvalor We had multi-billion dollars in intel telling us saddam had weapons of mass destruction and we all know how that turned out.
      Billions of dollars spent, unfortunately, does not equal quality of product.

      Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • boobs... yummm...

    Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

    (2) | Report

  • Technically, Romney had a point. Initially, the Obama administration claimed the incident occurred in reaction to the anti-Islamic film "Innocence of Muslims". Romney made it perfectly clear, by rephrasing it in his follow up statement. The day following the attack on the US embassy, Obama's only mention of the word "terror" was not direct and was made towards the end of his speech:
    "No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation..."
    Furthermore More..

    Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

    (2) | Report

  • Thats strange.. I believe she said that he was correct.. that it did take almost 2 weeks for Obama to come out and say it was an act of terror..nice try in your attempt to turn it around though.

    Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

    (2) | Report

  • Read Obama’s transcript bozo (the actual transcript). Obama and the mediator are both wrong, and Romney is correct on his message. Obama, like Clinton - facts get in the way of their message.

    Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

    (2) | Report

  • She has since apologized, Romney was correct. How embarrassing.

    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matthew-sheffield/2012/10/16/candy-crowley-embarrasses-herself-falsely-corrects-romney-libya

    Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

    (2) | Report

  • Fun. Amusement. Titillation.

    V!

    Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

    (2) | Report

  • Candy Crowley: Romney was actually right on Libya
    http://www.therightscoop.com/candy-crowley-romney-was-actually-right-on-libya/

    Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

    (2) | Report

  • moderator retracted statement...she was wrong.

    Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

    (2) | Report

    • @kingrasta How stupid are you?

      Just cause you cannot read, you think we cannot read? It is in the transcripts.

      Obama said exactly "No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for".

      SHow me where she retracted her statement?

      Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

      (3) | Report

    • @TEXAS HOLDEM123
      Candy Crowley: He Was Right

      http://freebeacon.com/candy-crowley-he-was-right/

      Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @Biker15k Do you know the meaning of "retract"?

      It does not even have a freaking statement from her.

      The link you send me out of the whole page the only words from Candy crowly I read were under quotations " “right in the main” but “picked the wrong word” "

      8 words from her used under quotation and you call it a retracting of a statement? Go look up what retract means

      Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

      (2) | Report

    • @TEXAS HOLDEM123 Dude, we send the info, and you still say its wrong, nothing new with you guys.

      Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @Biker15k We send links, show she miss-spoke and it still is not enough for these people. Candy was on Obama's payroll.

      Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • Liberal BS. Liberal BS. Liberal BS. KutKorners is a bigot and a liberal. Hmmmmm one and the same.

    Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

  • yep, the reviews are the same everywhere except on LL ie: Fringeville USA, and FauxNews.

    Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

  • Go to 1:52 in this video.

    Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

  • She admitted today Romney was right. The White House was claiming the killings came out of a demonstration protesting that lame video that came out in June. It was actually a terrorist attack on the 11th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks and had nothing to do with the film.

    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=52b_1350486360

    Posted Oct-17-2012 By 

    (1) | Report