Safe Mode: On
BBC correspondent reveals truth. this concerns you. MUST WATCH!

If you only have time for one video today. this is it.

BBC Middle East correspondent radio interview
listen to what he is saying...... just listen! and tell others

This is former Senior BBC Mideast Correspondent Alan Hart Full interview with Kevin Barrett can be heard here-http://www.radiodujour.com/mp3/20100525-kevin-barrett-alan-hart.mp3




Please vote and comment, for more awesome vids subscribe~

[/*][/list]

Loading the player ...
Embed CodeSwitch Player
Plays: 9691 (Embed: 0)

Added: Feb-14-2012 Occurred On: Feb-14-2012
By: radioactive
In:
Politics
Tags: mossad, israeli inside job, WTF, 9/11 bbc
Location: United States (load item map)
Views: 10451 | Comments: 231 | Votes: 12 | Favorites: 11 | Shared: 263 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
'
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Cuckoo!

    Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

    (7) | Report

    • @Ithinkthat1 You are definitely entitled to your own opinion! Go ahead. Express yourself. Cuckoo why exactly? a genuine question not a mocking one.

      Posted Feb-15-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @radioactive The sheer number of people that would have to be involved in a cover up of a controlled demolition of a building of that size is so great that it would be virtually impossible. Have you ever seen how they do a controlled demolition? Miles of blasting cable, drilling thousands of holes in the support beams on every floor to place the charges, all while no one noticed or heard a thing. There's no way, it's sheer lunacy to think that this happened.

      Posted Feb-15-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

    • @Ithinkthat1 thats a "standard" controlled demo (where safety is key). what about a bunch of remote controlled C4. All I am sayng is that it is less far fetched and it is slightly more "possible" so to speak

      Posted Feb-15-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @radioactive That's still implausible. They stillcan't would havehave taken months of pre demolition and drilling. They would have just used a giant bomb.What if the hijackers had failed?

      Posted Feb-15-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • If I only had time for one video today, I'd be ticked if I wasted it on this one.

    Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

    (6) | Report

  • Comment of user 'H8theState' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • More BS.

    Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

    (5) | Report

    • @GradySizematters "more BS" is no longer a valid statement of fact! how about you challenge your existence by backing it up with some proper follow up link..statement.. noise

      Posted Feb-15-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @radioactive
      The burden isnt on me to prove what everyone in the world knows. Its on you tin foil hat racks.
      PROVE one thing that shows this was an inside job. Thats all anyones asked from day one. Instead you get a bunch of what if's and could be's, and hearsay bullshit. Ask ten different engineers an opinion and you'll get 10 different answers. So if your looking for FACTS, show us ONE. Belive me, I wasnt a sheep in the herd when this happened. I researched, watched thousands of videos, and More..

      Posted Feb-15-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • If you only have time for one comment today, this is it. You are a WACKO.

    Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

    (5) | Report

    • @tank2 I didn't attack anyone personally. I am offering a video with opinion and if you dont like it you are not even obliged to comment. but I am not a pussy and since you called me a wacko I am gonna call you an ignorant fool. thats about right in terms of strength

      Posted Feb-15-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • LOOL o brother...I stopped at 1:20 when they said controlled ground explosion.

    Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

    (5) | Report

    • @just_crsn47 oh yeah and you Sir are professor who? of the Engineering department at Harvard university. get real and continue selling meat. thats what you're good at. they should put an IQ filter so only people above 120 can comment. Go ahead I dare you to test your own IQ. I GUARANTEE its lower than 110

      Posted Feb-15-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @radioactive LOL.....are u?? If you are your momma wasted a lot of tuition money sending you to school.....I do truely feel sorry for you if you believe this BS but Darwin will thin your kind out eventually.
      Just clarify, I dont sell meat...I hunt it, kill it and then eat it......you know how they did it before supermarkets were invented...lol

      Posted Feb-15-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • Holy Shit, this Guy is into some powerful stuff.
    Remember people, if it has the word "truth" in the title, 99 times out of 100, it's bullshit.
    As in this case.

    The muzzlim Ass-kisser would have us believe, Mossad infiltrated the 911 Prick's then flew the planes into buildings.
    So what the fuck were the muzzlim's doing, hijacking the planes, going on vacation?
    Mossad must be pretty good, and the ayraab's dumb as shit if Mossad has infiltrated "every ayraab military, every ayrab go More..

    Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

    (5) | Report

    • @Dave556 yeah i know its like believing the president off america is a puppet who would he answer to ffs how stupid are people to believe obama answers to anyone other than mrs obama......oh wait!

      Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

      (-3) | Report

    • @Dave556. LOL, I didn't even listen to 10 sec. of this crap. If i had heard him say "whatever", i would've pissed and shit myself laughing. hahaha

      Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

      (-1) | Report

  • I'm sick of these conspiracy theories. Think of how many government officials would've had to be involved to do this. You're telling me not one of them came through to give hard evidence? Bullshit.

    Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

    (4) | Report

    • @rewindurmind
      I know.
      Plain and simple: Jet hits building. Building collapses.

      You are dealing with stone-age terrorists. Quick and effective is all they want. I am quite sure that the WTC attackers and planners had no idea that the entire building would actually collapse.

      Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

    • @Rhemis building 7...? pentagon ? field in shanksville ?

      Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @Rhemis The way all 3 buildings, especially #7, collapse is inconsistent with physics, so say thousands of degree holding professionals not payed by the government.

      Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

    • @Hamster Whats inconsistent with the collapses? I really would like for you to explain the physics of 9/11 to me. You truthers seem to have learned physics alot differently than I have.

      You have few thousand "college educated" people who says it was an inside job. I have millions of degree holding professionals who dont side with your handful of "professionals."

      Posted Feb-15-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @barogers619 The tops of the buildings fall straight down through the path of greatest resistance, millions of tons of steel not hit by an airplane. Like buttah. Building 7 falls symetrically straight down as if all of it's support beams were destroyed instantaneously by a few office fires. Buildings 4, 5, and 6 had #1 and #2 fall on them yet they were were left standing, more or less. Set aside your Stockholm Syndrome for a minute. Something doesn't add up, partner.

      Posted Feb-15-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • This is getting so old it's like trying to sue Stalin for the "artificial Famine"

    GET A LIFE FFS!!!!

    Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

    (4) | Report

  • where are the documents that prove the dancing muslims were mossad agents?, where are the hundreds of people that conspired to do this? where are the remnants of ground explosives used to topple the buldings?

    -bunch of idiots

    Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

    (4) | Report

    • @mattb1974 There are documents that the dancing Israelis where indeed dancing and indeed Israelis. Take a peek at the police report and you get that they aren't moving company employees.
      http://www.scribd.com/doc/46173840/Dancing-Israelis-Police-Report
      They also did an interview after their 10 week American detention and deportation. It's in Hebrew but there are many translated versions out there. They clearly state that they were there to document "the event".

      I wont argue the More..

      Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

    • @JamesRWII
      -I read the report. So because some jihadists that were placed to observe got caught and identified themselves as isreali, that makes them isreali?

      -I mean if these guys were really Mossad agents on a covert mission to observe the largest attack on US soil ever, would they identify themselves as isreali to the police? Doesn't make sense to me.

      Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @mattb1974 you fail. they were deported to Israel and some of them appeared to TV claiming they were artists. Get real and do the quick search I am not going to spoon feedyou.

      Posted Feb-15-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @radioactive
      -show me some source material for your claims, you must have found this info out somewhere.

      Posted Feb-15-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @mattb1974

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97ImPcb4keY

      Posted Feb-15-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • More progressive propaganda to demonize Israel. You guys are pathetic and give them too much credit. Mind you its a nation about the size of NJ yet is apparently a threat to nations 10 times its size.

    The towers were not brought down by a controlled demolition. The amount of work time and manpower to pull it off CANNOT be hidden and done in secrecy. NONE of you truthers have ever addressed what it takes to bring a building down when I posted my challenge repeatedly on several WTC conspiracy po More..

    Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

    (4) | Report

    • @aa316

      They won't, because they can't back up the garbage that flows out of their mouths.

      I feel sorry for these people sometimes. I think their brain is wired in a way that they can't handle that an outside force (Islamo-Nazi'z) would want to come here and do them harm. So, it must be their own Gov that is out to get them...or the Jew's...either way.

      Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @aa316

      I don't believe that Israel did it, but I still don't get how building 7 collapsed without being hit by a plane. Any info?

      Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @rugbybloke25

      Ill tell you how and its been stated many many many times. Planes hit towers fiery debris hit WTC7. building 7 evacuated. No resources to fight fires in building 7 due to life saving efforts in WTC1 and 2. Fire burned uncontrollably for 8 hours in WTC7 structure became unstable due to intense heat for so many hours. build collapsed.

      Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

      (3) | Report

    • @rugbybloke25 tons of info out there one thing you have to learn is how it was built. from the outside looks typical but it wasnt, its construction was as unique as the twins. Also the footage of 7 used in all truther vids is edited. They DELIBERATELY LEAVE OUT the first 8 seconds where you see the "penthouse" collapse from left to right. That is because the truss (1 of 3) on the left side went first internally. So the penthouse collapses as its an internal collapse then the whole stru More..

      Posted Feb-15-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @Godsrage yep! see my response to rugbybloke25

      Posted Feb-15-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • Where does the controlled demolition theory come from? The towers collapsed from the point of impact and disintegrated from the top down. A demolition causes collapse at the bottom and the building disintegrates from the bottom up and with less mess.

    Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

    (4) | Report

  • Comment of user 'DFW1990' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • As soon as he said, "The towers were brought down by a ground controlled demolition", I stopped watching...BULLSHIT! The towers collapsed right at point of plane impact. PERIOD!

    Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

    (4) | Report

  • no plane could have been that accurate hitting the towers unless it was aided by a homing signal ... so all the planes that land at airports all around the world every hour of the day are just good luck or a miracle considering they only have a small area to put all those planes down on the ground .... yeah right

    Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

    (4) | Report

    • @nzkiwi While I understand what your saying, I think the point they were trying to raise was the speed at which they were going when hitting the buildings.

      When you land you aren't going full speed in fact your trying to drop your speed as low as safely possible just prior to landing.

      Still; I don't see what seemed so hard about smacking a couple of huge towers with a plane though, they would have had quite a few minutes to line it up while on approach.

      Posted Feb-15-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • Trying to sell a book. Big deal. Whole lot of conjecture.

    P.S. if a remote targeting system can fly the planes into the towers, then a pilot definitely can. One or the other, take your pick. Either it's possible, or it isn't.

    Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

    (3) | Report

  • Yes this guy is right!! You know how I know?

    He said a ground controlled demolition! And clearly in every video you can see the collapse started.....................................................................................not at the ground? But point of impact. Yes no credibility;ity issues here.

    I guess since he lost his job at BBC, he needed a new avenue to bring in some revenue. And he found out that gullible people will give you some money as long as you talk about controlled demo a More..

    Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

    (3) | Report

    • Comment of user 'updougdown' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @barogers619 really, i take it you forgot about the big hole blown in the base off the towers just before the plane hit ?
      isn't that starting at the bottom ?

      Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @updougdown Been a busy day at Langley!

      Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @weadone What hole? Blown out beore the plane hit? What evidence states this?

      And show me in any video of the towers collapsing where, like a controlled demo, collapse initiates at the bottom.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atSd7mxgsGY&feature=related

      Now watch this vid and repeat the lie that collapse started at the bottom.

      Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @weadone

      i take it you forgot about the big hole blown in the base off the towers just before the plane hit ???????????????

      Before the planes hit you say?? Got any links to that?? I've never heard that one before.

      Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

      (2) | Report

  • Comment of user 'Fahstahoahn' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • Comment of user 'etherealspectre' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @etherealspectre THATS the DEFINITION of false flag .actually does make sense if you realize they dont actually give a fuk about anyone but themselves. thats the whole point of false flag! like the syrian government did when they took out one of their generals and blamed it on "alqaeda" to get public opinion on their side.

      who benefited from 9/11? Israel. no saddam and no osama and no gadaffi. fantastic! and they didnt even lose a single life of their own. thanks USA! where was your a More..

      Posted Feb-15-2012 By 

      (-1) | Report

    • Comment of user 'etherealspectre' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @etherealspectre THATS the DEFINITION of false flag .actually does make sense if you realize they dont actually give a fuk about anyone but themselves. thats the whole point of false flag! like the syrian government did when they took out one of their generals and blamed it on "alqaeda" to get public opinion on their side.

      who benefited from 9/11? Israel. no saddam and no osama and no gadaffi. fantastic! and they didnt even lose a single life of their own. thanks USA! where was your More..

      Posted Feb-15-2012 By 

      (-1) | Report

    • Comment of user 'etherealspectre' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • the speaker ruins his credibility in the first minute.

    Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

    (3) | Report

  • Whenever a video say MUST SEE and watch it 3 times without a description I know its bullshit and I don't even bother watching it.

    Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

    (3) | Report

  • Jews did 9/11

    Posted Feb-15-2012 By 

    (3) | Report

  • Pfffft.

    Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

    (2) | Report

  • I think when the 5 dancing Israelis say they were there to document the event, it doesn't mean they knew it would happen. Remember that this was also translated from Hebrew. I think they saw a plane hit a building and started filming and therefore when asked "what were you doing there?", they responded "we were documenting the event." Does anyone have the film the 5 Israelis took? I'll bet they didn't catch the first plane strike.

    Posted Feb-15-2012 By 

    (2) | Report

    • @Ithinkthat1 your right theres nothing leading up to it and there is nothing saying they were mossad, i dont understand how the same CT will talk down about the media and how the mdeia will twist everything yet it was the media that first came out with they were mossad agents, hypocritcs they will only run with whatever information best suits them its sad. be consistent, these fuckers cant even agree with a plane hitting the pentagon or a missile or the flight path to the pentagon

      Posted Feb-15-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

  • speculation isn't fact,its a guess opinion

    Posted Feb-14-2012 By 

    (2) | Report