Safe Mode: On
Nanny State Gone Wild

The greatest gifts you can give your children can’t be boxed and bowed. Consider the timeless gift of self-sufficiency – a stubborn thirst to leave the nest, make it own your own, and live as a free-willed adult. It’s a concept that Big Nanny Democrats are sabotaging at every legislative turn.

Several times during the sneaky weekend debate on the government health care takeover bill this past Sunday, Democrats hailed a provision requiring insurance plans that cover dependents to provide benefits to children up to age 26. Democrat Sens. Ben Cardin and Tom Harkin both specifically championed the unfunded mandate in their floor statements.

This manifestation of the Nanny State is especially galling given the massive levels of generational theft that the Democrat majority has presided over the last year. If they truly cared about the physical and financial well-being of young Americans, they’d stop piling on expensive regulations that simply put affordable health insurance out of their reach. I propose a new symbol for the Democrats. Out: Donkey. In: A giant adult pacifier.

I can tell you what most fiscally responsible parents are thinking when they hear the feds “taking care” of everyone else’s adult “children” for them by confiscating their tax dollars and forcing private companies to comply: You’ve got to be kidding me. Yes, Virginia, there are still some of us left who believe our children shouldn’t depend on a government-manufactured umbilical cord as they approach their third decade on earth.

Nonetheless, there are now an estimated 20 states that have already passed legislation requiring insurers to cover adult children. The slacker mandates cover “kids” ranging in age from 24 to 31. And it’s these very government health care mandates that are driving up the cost of insurance. Health policy researcher Nathan Benefield of the Commonwealth Institute reported that in New Jersey, Nanny State peddlers claimed the adult kiddie protection law would help 100,000 uninsured young adults. “Yet in two years, only 6% of that estimate has been realized. The primary reason—health insurance is still too expensive.”

Wisconsin has experienced similar results. “Whenever you insure somebody whom you didn’t insure before there’s some additional risk,” insurance expert James Mueller told the Milwaukee Sentinel-Journal. Mueller points to the premium increases that have followed over coverage mandates on employer-sponsored plans. “The problem with all these good ideas is there’s funding necessary,” Mueller said. In Wisconsin, adult children are not only covered, but also the children of those “children” if they live in single-parent homes.

As he rammed this mandate and the mountain of other government regulations buried in Demcare, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid promised on Sunday: “We are reshaping the nation. That’s what we want to do.” Indeed, this defining dependency up phenomenon is part of the larger push for single-payer-by-proxy. The other universal health care Trojan Horse signed into law this year – the expansion of SCHIP (the State Children’s Health Insurance Program) – welcomed more non-“children” into the government insurance fold.

Both political parties have advocated federal waivers to use SCHIP funds for adults, including parents of Medicaid/SCHIP children, caretaker relatives, legal guardians, and childless adults. According to the General Accounting Office, SCHIP-funded expenditures on adults nationwide “totaled about $674 million in 2006.” J.P. Wieske of the Council for Affordable Health Insurance notes that the bennies incentivize parents to drop their private coverage in order to take advantage of free or discounted health insurance for their children. “It has become a program for the middle class at the expense of the poor.”

This is the engine that will power the Demcare architects’ most naked, radical ambitions: “Health care as an inalienable right,” as Sen. Harkin put it. How? By breeding a massive permanent culture of dependency and bottomless debt in the name of the “children” from birth through quarterlife — and beyond.


Click to view image: 'aeeaea6f133f-paci.jpg'

Added: Dec-24-2009 
By: MarkusMarone
In:
LiveLeaks
Tags: United Communist States of America, Obama, Miserable Failure, Nanny State, Punish Success, Reward Failure
Marked as: approved
Views: 6768 | Comments: 14 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Liberals DESPISE self sufficiency. It makes them look bad. Aren't children silly?

    Posted Dec-24-2009 By 

    (3)

    • I would add personal responsibility to that. Libs love the ever intrusive bureacracy because it gives them the cover for not being able to make their own decisions. If it goes well then they take credit if it goes badly then it's always the other guys fault.

      The typical Libertard fall back position. Kind of like all the Obamites that are still screaming it's Bush's fault even though at this point the two of them are more similar than not.

      Posted Dec-24-2009 By 

      (2)

  • The rise of EMPATHY...jeeez!

    Posted Dec-24-2009 By 

    (2)

  • The marxist mindset places the relationship between the state and the self above all other relationships, specifically relationships between the self and God, the self and family, and the self and friends. The joy that some people feel upon coming home to their family should be superseded by the joy of getting a free block of government cheese handed to you by the local party apparatchik. The love you feel for you spouse should be superseded by the love you feel for your glorious leader. The More..

    Posted Dec-24-2009 By 

    (2)

  • Get that liberal/conservative thing out of your mind. It is deception. It gives you the false idea that things will get better if we can vote the other party in again. Both parties are controlled by the big banks. It is not a nanny state. It is a ranch state. The people are cattle; Beasts of burden; An investment.

    Posted Dec-24-2009 By 

    (1)

    • If you actually stop for just a minute and review what's been said along the way here at LL , you'd realize that we are talking about Democrats, Republicans and most important of all Independent Conservatives(Constitionalists?). Check a few polls and you might just be surprised to see how large the last group is and I'd be willing to bet most of that group would be able to educate you about that particular document better than any sitting politician, since most have never read it or understand More..

      Posted Dec-24-2009 By 

      (0)

    • After the next election, I predict the same invisible people will be in control of our lives. I am not bitching and moaning. I am trying to be a good cousin.

      Did you know that the name on the birth certificate is a corporation registered to the state? All of the ID in our pockets refers to a legal entity that is not us and is not ours. When the state calls 'your' name, they are calling their name. The use of their name comes with strings attached. That is the game we're stuck playing. How can More..

      Posted Dec-24-2009 By 

      (-2)

    • Once again just take a look arouing here on LL, this is but a small sampling of the outrage we have for the elite politicians.

      Our constitution states pretty clearly what we can do to rectify this little aberation we have at the moment.

      I can trace my family back to when this was just a bunch of ragtag colonies and I for one will never give up the this fight for our Liberty and our Constitution.

      Maybe you should come on down and get a real feel for the anger that the people here have ab More..

      Posted Dec-24-2009 By 

      (0)

    • Hello? I just showed you the door to freedom and you ignored it. You chose instead to focus on all the angry people who are outraged by the trampling of liberty and freedom. Those people should be angry with themselves for neglecting their responsibility of eternal vigilance. They didn't take the time to comprehend contracts. Now they're going to lash out in violence when it is not necessary. They are going to repeat history. Big Brother is ready for that. I don't want to see it.

      Posted Dec-24-2009 By 

      (0)

  • Try being self-sufficient without the roads, clean water, military, police, fire, and education services provided by the "Nanny State."

    I know it makes you feel good to present the meme as such, "look at me, I can take care of myself and don't need no stinkin' gov'ment to survive..."but a little more thought and it all sounds silly.

    Remember, the "nanny state" created the internets which you so gleefully spew your ignorance.

    Posted Dec-24-2009 By 

    (-1)

    • Those services you mentioned are the ONLY thing a government should be running. Nothing more. My healthcare is perfect. So are most people's plans. Obamcare covers people who contribute nothing to society; people who don't pay taxes and would rather stick their bills onto other people. The nanny state enables these losers and encourages that type of mindset. If the government only provided the services you listed above, we'd have a much more responsible, self-sufficient country.

      Posted Dec-24-2009 By 

      (4)

    • For a minute I thought maybe he had actually read the Constitution over a few times but NOOOooooooo such luck.

      However he's getting warmer, Once he sees his tax bill next year we may just have a convert.

      Naw, that's just delusional now that I read it over a couple of times.

      Posted Dec-24-2009 By 

      (1)

    • You and I agree that government should be lean and efficient. I get a good value from my taxes, which are the lowest in the industrial world, and enjoy excellent government services, clean and drinkable water, and public safety. I am under no delusions that they are perfect, but they are at least comparable to the best services in the world.

      Now, it is not inconceivable that a government run health care or insurance system can run at a higher rate of service and efficiency than the system t More..

      Posted Dec-24-2009 By 

      (-1)

    • Like most liberals, I doubt he pays taxes.

      Posted Dec-24-2009 By 

      (2)