Intel creates faster and more energy-efficient processors

In an effort to keep squeezing more components onto silicon chips, Intel has begun mass-producing processors based on 3-D transistors. The move not only extends the life of Moore's Law (the prediction that the number of transistors per chip will double roughly every two years) but could help significantly increase the energy efficiency and speed of processors.
The on-and-off flow of current in conventional chips is controlledby an electric field generated by a so-called gate that sits on top of a wide, shallow conducting channel embedded in a silicon substrate. With the 3-D transistors, that current-carrying channel has been flipped upright, rising off the surface of the chip. The channel material can thus be in contact with the gate on both its sides and its top, leaving little of the channel exposed to interference from stray charges in the
substrate below. In earlier transistors, these charges interfered with the gate's ability to block current, resulting in a constant flow of leakage current.
With virtually no leakage current, a transistor can switch on and off more cleanly and quickly, and it can be run at lower power, since designers don't have to worry that leakage current could be mistaken for an "on" signal.
Intel claims the new transistors can switch up to 37 percent faster than its previous transistors or consume as little as half as much power. Faster switching means faster chips. In addition, because oftheir smaller footprint, the transistors can be packed closer together.
Signals thus take less time to travel between them, further speeding up the chip.
The first processors based on the technology will shortly appear in laptops. But the electronics industry is especially excited by the prospect of conserving power in handheld devices. That means designers can upgrade the performance of a device without requiring bulkier batteries, or reduce battery size without lowering performance. "Ten years ago everyone only cared about making chips faster," says Mark Bohr, who heads process technology at Intel. "Today low-power operation is much more important." He adds that the power savings and performance gains will be magnified in handheld devices because the smaller transistors will make it possible for a single chip to handle functions such memory, broadband communications, and GPS, each of which used to require its own chip. With fewer chips and smaller batteries, gadgets will be able to do more in tinier packages.
The new transistor design leaves room for enough further improvement to see the industry through the next five years. Intel's previous chips could pack in 4.87 million transistors per square millimeter; the new chips have 8.75 million, and by 2017, about 30 million transistors per square millimeter should be possible. "This buys silicon another few generations," says Bohr.
By: MrScabs
In: Science and Technology
Tags: Intel, micro, processors, transistors, smaller, faster
Location: United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 1298 | Comments: 11 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
FireFox faster (No Music) for Windows Users (2nd try)
-
micro$oft finally defeated fuhrer
-
Micro sculpter.....man makes sulptures that fit inside the eye of a needle
-
New Dell XPS Adamo released today
-
Faster, Cheaper Chips From Space Technology
-
Intel Debuts Wireless Power At Developer Forum
-
Speeding is bad, but it does get you there faster
-
Networked Grid Computing Utilized to Simulate Future IC Transistor Designs
-
JapanLand Gun Pr0n - Micro Uzi
-
Scientists unveil chip which could make desktop computers 20 times faster
-
Processors - What happens when the cpu cooler is removed?
-
Conan - A Visit to Intel



@Boing ...your comment makes you sound incredibly dumb - did you know that was how it would come across to others on the internet?
Posted Aug-25-2012 ByNepean109 (1007.60) 
Nepean109 View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Nepean109 he is right in a way.. 1st of all, it is extreme close picture and it is not much difference if you zoom present cpu transistors. if intel claim is present cpu is 2d then these new ones are too.
Posted Aug-25-2012 ByIHATEZIONS (451.20) IHATEZIONS View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Nepean109 Sarcasm seems to be beyond you Nepeon :/
Any image on a computer screen is 2d.. but if you've got to explain it, forgetta 'bout it.
P.S. It's you who comes across like a dumbass. Do you believe The Onion?
Posted Aug-25-2012 ByBoing (61.00) 
Boing Send Message
(0)
Cool stuff.
Posted Aug-25-2012 ByNepean109 (1007.60) 
Nepean109 View Channel Send Message
(0)
Interesting, yes. But it's old news mate... over a year old. 22nm architecture .
Posted Aug-25-2012 BySolidoil (16.10) 
Solidoil View Channel Send Message
(0)
MrScabs, thanks for posting informative videos.
Posted Aug-25-2012 Bygovett (896.60) govett View Channel Send Message
(0)
Fuck. So now this new intel i7 cpu I bought is a piece of junk?
May as well throw it out.
Posted Aug-25-2012 Bysungam (1337.48) 
sungam View Channel Send Message
(0)
...and inTel will still make a "dumbed down" version of the same chip to make money on the poorer class as well.
"...4.87 million transistors per square millimeter; the new chips have 8.75 million, and by 2017, about 30 million..."
I don't mind if my device is slightly bigger, or the same size, as long as it works. I don't need a phone that is so thin and small that I can't hold it.
Posted Aug-26-2012 ByRhemis (961.98) 
Rhemis View Channel Send Message
(0)
since the intel cpu design for pentium designed by israeli companies last 15 years ago, the cpu speed didn't improve much last 10 years but we get bullshit news like these.. they charge extremely high price with their monopoly business and not much increase the speed or cores unless they forced to do so..
the intel should use the design of the cpus by U.S, taiwanese and japanese instead of these stupid untalented greedy israeli engineers who useless to produce upto time and most of theuir desi More..
Posted Aug-25-2012 ByIHATEZIONS (451.20) IHATEZIONS View Channel Send Message
(-2)
@IHATEZIONS You are free to make your own CPU if you are unsatisfied with the current market.
Posted Aug-25-2012 Bysungam (1337.48) 
sungam View Channel Send Message
(2)
@sungam sure, give me £5billion for a cpu plant, if you don't have the money because you bailout the other top jewish bankers and their glabal investments..
Posted Aug-26-2012 ByIHATEZIONS (451.20) IHATEZIONS View Channel Send Message
(-2)