Safe Mode: On
US deploys F-22s to base near Iran

Senior Saudi official urges Gulf unity to confront Iran - RIYADH, Saudi Arabia — Saudi Arabia’s deputy foreign minister says Gulf Arab states must seek full integration of key affairs such as diplomacy and defense to counter perceived threats including Iran’s nuclear ambitions and Arab Spring spillover.Prince Abdulaziz bin Abdullah’s comments highlight strong Saudi support for unity efforts among the six-nation Gulf Cooperation Council.




The U.S. military has deployed several F-22s, the nation's most advanced fighter jets, to an allied base less than 200 miles from Iran.

The Air Force strongly denies this deployment is meant as a show of force against Iran or that it is in some way related to a potential strike on Iran's nuclear facilities. Rather, it says this is all part of a routine deployment and "security cooperation with regional partners."

The Air Force won't say how many jets were sent or exactly where they are stationed, but privately, U.S. officials have told Fox News the jets are in hangars at the United Arab Emirates' Al Dafra Air Base, a fact first reported by Aviation Week.

The F-22 has not yet seen combat. The jets were not used in Iraq, Afghanistan or Libya. They are stealth, and they specialize in air-to-air combat, but can also strike air-to-ground if needed. As one Air Force official put it, "this is America's premier fighter jet. It has no rival."

The next round for Iran nuclear negotiations, which many consider to be the country's last diplomatic opportunity, takes place on May 23 in Baghdad.

"The United States Air Force has deployed F-22s to Southwest Asia. Such deployments strengthen military-to-military relationships, promote sovereign and regional security, improve combined tactical air operations, and enhance interoperability of forces, equipment and procedures," Lt.Col. John Dorrian, Air Force public affairs, said in a written statement.




http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/04/27/us-deploys-f-22s-to-base-near-iran/?test=latestnews



http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/senior-saudi-official-urges-gulf-unity-to-confront-iran-arab-spring-uprisings/2012/04/28/gIQAyzBYnT_story.html


Added: Apr-28-2012 Occurred On: Apr-28-2012
By: aydeo
In:
Iran, Other Middle East
Tags: U.S. military, deploy, F-22, Saudi Arabia, deputy foreign minister, Gulf unity, Iran
Marked as: approved
Views: 2869 | Comments: 54 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 26 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Comment of user 'MB-UK' has been deleted by author!
  • MUSLIMS - HOLD ON TO YOUR BALLS !!!!!!!!! :D

    Posted Apr-28-2012 By 

    (3)

  • Maybe the libTARDS will make good on their prediction of a june invasion of Iran yet ?
    oBama(D) is their man

    Posted Apr-28-2012 By 

    (2)

  • I hope we don't attack Iran, we have enough shitstorms on our hands not to be getting involved in others. Leave them to their BS.

    Posted Apr-28-2012 By 

    (2)

  • Well, lets hope it doesn't rain and the war lasts no longer than 1.7 hours.

    Posted Apr-28-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Alright boys lets get it done.

    Posted Apr-29-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Good looking plane!
    S300 S400 are dangerous for this 3rd generation?

    Posted Apr-28-2012 By 

    (0)

    • @Atrey
      its a 5th generation fighter.

      not third.

      Posted Apr-28-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @wharris
      Oups! Thx!
      So AA dangerous?

      Posted Apr-28-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @Atrey

      As soon as anything turns on its radar they see and kill it from many miles away....

      Posted Apr-28-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @Atrey
      Its radar signature has been compared to that of a steel ball bearing!

      Its broad spectrum, all aspect low observable. That protects the F-22 by;
      1) Being difficult or impossible to detect by search radar or IR.
      2) Being difficult or impossible to identify by search radar or IR.
      3) Being difficlut or impossible to track by search radar or IR
      4) Being difficult or impossible to track by missile homing radar
      4) making countermeasures more effective vs tracking missiles

      Not only is the sear More..

      Posted Apr-28-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @mikedelta12
      Thx!

      Posted Apr-28-2012 By 

      (1)

  • Perhaps if we can make President Obama a single term president, we can fire up the Lockheed-Martin factories, and crank out more of these planes.

    Posted Apr-28-2012 By 

    (0)

    • @wharris The air force canceled the order, not Obama.

      They said, basically, they're unnecessary because no one is even close to having anything that can challenge it.

      Posted Apr-28-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @Roach1983
      The decision was more political than that that.

      Dave Walker, Comptroller General of the US, appointed by President Clinton, started the cancelation process by stating; "the DOD has not demonstrated the need or value for making further investments in the F-22A program."

      In January 2008, the Pentagon announced that it would ask Congress to fund additional F-22s

      On 12 November 2008, the Pentagon released $50 million of the $140 million approved by Congress to buy parts for More..

      Posted Apr-28-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @wharris I wouldn't be surprised that the minute the last F-22 rolled out they would remake the air squadrons to be all unmanned.

      Posted Apr-28-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @GatewayMetalHead
      That is a great thought. And to tell you the truth, the thought has crossed my mind too.

      Posted Apr-28-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @wharris
      There's ALWAYS something in development! That's why technology thieves like China will always be a generation behind.

      Posted Apr-28-2012 By 

      (1)

  • Nice. Hope they get some real world action.

    Posted Apr-28-2012 By 

    (0)

  • http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/09/AR2009070903020.html

    Posted Apr-28-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Saudi arabia want US to do its dirty work for it

    Posted Apr-28-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Comment of user 'teotwawki' has been deleted by author!
  • Getsome!

    Posted Apr-29-2012 By 

    (0)

  • why dont the saudis do something about Assad instead

    Posted Apr-28-2012 By 

    (-1)

  • Russia and China are on their way too...it's gonna get nasty soon.

    Posted Apr-28-2012 By 

    (-3)