Safe Mode: On
Behind the Deepening Crisis with Iran: The Real Story Versus the Cover Story

By Mark H Gaffney

February 21, 2012 "Information Clearing House" --- Recently, President Obama imposed new sanctions on Iran which according to reports have been very effective, causing a sudden major devaluation of Iran's currency. The Iranians correctly understand that they are under attack, and have threatened to respond by closing the strait of Hormuz, through which a large percentage of oil from the Mideast flows to the global economy.



If the crisis deepens and Iran makes good on its threat to close Hormuz, there is little doubt that the US will intervene to reopen the strait. This will lead to a shooting war for which Iran will be blamed, even though the recent US sanctions were tantamount to overt aggression.

I believe the US will exploit the situation to attack Iran's nuclear facilities. But, even more importantly, the US will target Iran's conventional missiles. Indeed, I believe this is the real reason for US sanctions in the first place, and for the buildup of tensions in recent days. Despite public perceptions, and all the rhetoric about nukes, the present crisis has nothing to do with Iran's alleged nuclear weapons program. In my opinion, that is just a cover story.

The real issue is the fact that Iran has upgraded its medium range conventionally-armed missiles with GPS technology, making its missiles much more accurate. This means Iran can now target Israel's own nuclear, bio and chemical weapons stockpiles, located inside Israel, as well as the Dimona nuclear reactor.

In short, Iran has achieved a conventional deterrent to Israel. Therefor, statements by Iranian officials that Iran has no nuclear weapons program are in my view probably correct. Presently, Iran does not need nukes to deter Israel. It can do so with its GPS-guided medium range missiles. The Israelis are no doubt gnashing their teeth over this, because they now find themselves threatened by their own WMD stockpiles, and by their own nuclear reactors, especially Dimona, all of which have become targets.

A few direct hits by Iran could cause a toxic plume, killing thousands of Israelis. A worst case might signal the end of the Jewish state.

It is important to realize that Iran would never launch a pre-emptive strike on Israel because the Iranians know that the US/Israeli response would be devastating. However, if Iran comes under attack first, all bets are off. Iran will defend itself. A counter attack on Israel cannot be ruled out because Iranian leaders understand clearly (even if the American people do not) that the crisis has been manufactured, on Israel's behalf.



From the Israeli standpoint, the present Iranian deterrent (though conventional) is simply unacceptable. Israel's military strategists have always insisted on total freedom of movement.

This is why Israel refused a US offer many years ago to sign a defense pact with the US. Such a treaty would have limited Israel's freedom of movement, and this was unacceptable. Israel's leaders preferred to remain independent. Israel has always insisted on the "freedom" to intimidate its neighbors, whenever and howsoever it chooses. Iran's conventional missiles now curtail that "freedom." Israeli officials probably worry, for example, that Iran's conventional missiles would limit its freedom to attack Hezbollah in Lebanon, in a future conflict. Hezbollah is closely allied with Tehran.

I believe the present crisis has been manufactured to create the pretext for a US air campaign to take out Iran's conventional missile sites. The US will also target Iran's nuclear facilities, but the primary target will be Iran's conventional missiles. The US will be doing Israel's bidding. The Zionist tail will be wagging the servile US dog.

Obviously, you can't generate public support for such a bombing campaign, on Israel's behalf. Hence the cover story about nukes and the alleged Iranian threat to wipe Israel off the map, all of which is untrue but very effective propaganda nonetheless.



The problem for the US is that depriving Iran of its conventional deterrent will not be easy to accomplish. Indeed, it will be even more difficult than taking out all of Iran's nuclear facilities. Iran's conventional missiles are probably dispersed widely. If they come under attack, the purpose of the air campaign will be transparently obvious to the Iranian leadership. Faced with the prospect of losing their deterrent, the Mullahs may well decide to fire their conventional missiles. If they do and manage some direct hits on Israel's nuclear-bio-and chemical weapons stockpiles, the ensuing disaster will prompt an Israeli response. Israel may even resort to the Samson Option, and attack Iran with nukes. Words cannot describe the horrific scale of such an outcome. Unfortunately, it is all too possible.

Early in the war, US naval forces in the Gulf will also come under attack. No mistake, Iran has enough anti-ship cruise missiles to pose a grave threat to the US naval presence in the Gulf. Thousands of US sailors are now in harm's way, and at risk.

We must rally to prevent such a war. Peace activists must now marshal every asset for peace that we possess. The American people need to know the truth. This is a phony crisis. Yet the danger is very real. Now is the time to speak out with all of our strength. Tomorrow could come too late.

Mark H Gaffney’s forthcoming book, Black 9/11, will be released soon by Trineday Press. It can be ordered at www.trineday.com


Added: Sep-21-2012 Occurred On: Sep-21-2012
By: MrScabs
In:
World News, Iran, Other Middle East
Tags: IRAN, War, Missiles, US, ISREAL
Location: London, London, City of, United Kingdom (UK/GB) (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 2419 | Comments: 83 | Votes: 1 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Comment of user 'MrScabs' has been deleted by author!
  • On several occasions, Iran's leaders have said that Iran will destroy Israel.
    Iran is close to developing nuclear weapons.
    What else is there to know?
    Israel now has only one choice.
    When your neighbor points a gun at you, you can either shot him first or be shot.

    Posted Sep-21-2012 By 

    (4)

    • @govett
      Well if you're comparing some idiot, saying something stupid and comparing that to a gun, then you are no different from that idiot.

      Posted Sep-21-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • @govett "On several occasions, Iran's leaders have said that Iran will destroy Israel." incorrect, please cite where you got that from.
      "Iran is close to developing nuclear weapons." IAEA has already stated that Iran is not making weapons grade material.
      "What else is there to know?" Israel is afraid that Iran is turning into a first world country that they will no longer be able to bully at their whim. Iran keeps exposing Israel for what they are, an Zionist polit More..

      Posted Sep-21-2012 By 

      (0)

  • This whole argument is completely one sided against the US. You ahve completely forgotten that we are holding Israel back from making a unilateral movement on Iran. We want peace with transparency, but as long as you keep your nuclear facilities closed to the atomic agency's review and keep talking about wiping countries off the map, there is little anyone can do. If Iran wanted this to stop they would simply open their doors and show the World it is peaceful nuclear activities. While Iran is at More..

    Posted Sep-21-2012 By 

    (3)

  • so YOU have the "real" story, ehh?! mmm... where did you find it? Al Jazeera?

    Posted Sep-21-2012 By 

    (3)

  • Stop the nuke program and the sanctious would quickly end.

    This is all about their pursuit of WMD.

    Posted Sep-21-2012 By 

    (3)

    • @dorbie Not the WMD bullshit again? How many times will you fall for that?

      Posted Sep-21-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • @mannixxx Where there is smoke, there is fire. You think countries ideologically opposed to the existence of Israel will stand to let their sworn enemy be in possession of the only nuclear weapons? I think not. The US invasion of Iraq might have been a blunder, but it at the very least forced many countries to think twice before actively pursuing such capabilities.

      Posted Sep-21-2012 By 

      (3)

    • @mannixxx How do you not understand uranium enrichment and what they are doing. Yes they don't have a bomb yet, but they also havent let us see all facilities and they are stockpiling way too much medical grade uranium. This is because it is as high as they can enrich without having it be a red flag, but they quantity is too much. They are clearly enriching to medical grade and stockpiling it while they work on a delivery system. Once completed they will finish refining the uranium and a bomb wi More..

      Posted Sep-21-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @Sp33dyD3m0n WHy can't they have nuclear energy like everyone else? Pakistan is almost as sneaky as israel..those dirty bastards have those weapons. Just because they're not ( supposedly) saying they'll wipe out another country, doesnt mean they wont do it.

      Posted Sep-21-2012 By 

      (-2)

    • @mannixxx that and Iran never said they want to wipe Israel off the map, thats a mistranslation of what was stated. they want to wipe Zionism from the Israeli politics. the media never shows the huge number of proper Jews protesting along side other groups against the Israeli Zionist regime.
      20% enrichment is not enough to make weapon grade material. once it's been enriched, it can not be reprocessed to enrich it further. Medical isotopes are very much needed and are a great export.
      internationa More..

      Posted Sep-21-2012 By 

      (1)

  • Comment of user 'keepclosed' has been deleted by author!
  • Generals gathered in their masses
    Just like witches at black masses
    Evil minds that plot destruction
    Sorcerers of death's construction
    In the fields the bodies burning
    As the war machine keeps turning
    Death and hatred to mankind
    Poisoning their brainwashed minds
    Oh lord yeah!

    Politicians hide themselves away
    They only started the war
    Why should they go out to fight?
    They leave that role to the poor

    Posted Sep-21-2012 By 

    (2)

  • I hope somebody does something
    Iran makes direct threats, and nobody has done anything yet.
    reminds me of all the crap of Saddam. We all know how that went.
    Israel will make the first open move, but I am certain Seals are already in place to make a few little moves to get it all rolling.

    Posted Sep-21-2012 By 

    (2)

    • @Jegsman been watching too much Fox News and CNN since you were born? Are you saying that it's OK that certain countries constantly threaten Iran but Iran can't respond? Sorry, I've just noticed that you are an American and you fully support the bombing countries back to stone age type of democracy.. Do actually a little research who's interest was to make Saddam the ruler of Iraq...

      Posted Sep-21-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @bcr007 Actually I think the USA should fuck the hell off, and leave the rest of the World to shit for itself. But as long as were are going to War, we need to stop monkeyfucking it, and go in for the big KILL. I tell no lie when I say I really dont fear any dunecoons in Iraq or the rest of the shit places. However, when the leadership wants to say how they are going to do this and do that, We should sit by and watch, and if a REAL threat to damage the USA is seen, then go in and flatten the pla More..

      Posted Sep-22-2012 By 

      (0)

  • What a complete load.
    I never ceases to amaze me how far people will go to support oppressive regimes such as Iran.

    Posted Sep-21-2012 By 

    (1)

    • @wharris
      I didn't really see this post as support for Iran. Rather, it sounds like a completely plausible scenario. And a pretty good reason for not bombing the nuclear facilities so far. Iran could have a very powerful conventional deterrent. That, and a passive American president.

      Posted Sep-21-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @copperdog3
      I dunno,
      When a poster uses phrases like
      "The US will be doing Israel's bidding." I get the sense its a supporter for Iran.

      Posted Sep-21-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @wharris
      Fair point. I was looking past that nonsense.

      Posted Sep-21-2012 By 

      (1)

    • Comment of user 'Lone_Wolf' has been deleted by author!
  • Im sorry but this shit has been brewing for a long time...no peace activist is going to unstir the pot. Whether its right or wrong..who knows. But one thing is clear the middle east has become a shit stirring clusterfuck. It sucks to see citizens being victims of their governments policies, and knowing they have absolutely no outlet to express their views. Or else its off with their head.

    Posted Sep-21-2012 By 

    (1)

  • I think there is some truth to this, however one cannot discount the power nuclear weapons capability provides. Middle Eastern countries have been actively pursuing nuclear weapons for some time now, because at the end of the day, Israel is still the only country in the region in possession of such weapons. It's a trump card that nobody else can play. What Iran is probably more interested in is nuclear capability, meaning that should the regime choose, they would be able to construct a bomb w More..

    Posted Sep-21-2012 By 

    (1)

  • I'll wait for the movie to come out...

    Posted Sep-21-2012 By 

    (1)

  • So Iran has GPS-guided missiles. And who controls the GPS system? Thats right the US Department Of Defense. Guess what, the GPS signals can be modified locally to throw off guidance just like it was done to Russians in 2008 South Ossetia war vs Georgia. After that short war Russians started building their own version of GPS with a limited success.

    Posted Sep-21-2012 By 

    (1)

  • i came here for the picture, i see a rabbit.

    Posted Sep-21-2012 By 

    (1)

  • I have a great Idea! First thing I would do is drop embargo on Iran. If we keep up with this war we will all be screwed!!! The whole world is hurting right now. Israel has been dragging the USA down for to long. Its time we stopped the madness...

    Posted Sep-21-2012 By 

    (0)