Safe Mode: On
New Yorker Report: New details emerge about Israeli strike on Syrian reactor

New Yorker exposé sheds light on Mossad intel gathering that led to bombing of Al Kibar nuclear plant.

According to the New Yorker, Mossad agents broke into the home of a Syrian top official in Vienna and copied dozens of photographs of the secret facility, bombed in 2007; The U.S. was convinced by Israel's intelligence, but refused to carry out a strike- -


In March, 2007 Mossad agents raided the Vienna home of Ibrahim Othman, the head of the Syrian Atomic Energy Commission amid US and Israeli concerns over Syria's nuclear program. The information the operatives recovered was damning:
Roughly three dozen color photographs taken from inside a building under construction in the desert of northeastern Syria indicated that it was a top-secret plutonium nuclear reactor.


According to an exposé by The New Yorker's David Makovsky, the photographs showed workers from North Korea at the facility, and the reactor, from the inside, had "many of the same engineering elements as the North Korean reactor in Yongbyon."


In the days after the discovery of the Syrian site, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert "began hosting important meetings at his official residence, on Balfour Street," Makovsky wrote.


In April, the article said, the White House was informed about the discovery. The Bush Administration felt that it "didn’t have enough evidence to justify a preemptive strike on the Al Kibar reactor, and so the Israelis began preparations for an attack on their own. The IDF, the Mossad, and the Foreign Ministry all favored a low-signature attack on the reactor. "Just before midnight on September 5, 2007, four F-15s and four F-16s took off from Israeli Air Force bases. Using standard electronic scrambling tools, the Israelis blinded Syria’s air-defense system. Sometime between 12:40 and 12:53 am, the pilots indicated that 17 tons of explosives had been dropped on their target," according to the article.


Israel has never admitted to attacking the reactor.


http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4279387,00.html



http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/five-years-on-new-details-emerge-about-israeli-strike-on-syrian-reactor.premium-1.464033


Added: Sep-10-2012 Occurred On: Sep-10-2012
By: aydeo
In:
Other Middle East
Tags: New Yorker, Al Kibar nuclear plant, Syria, IAF, Mossad
Marked as: approved
Views: 2430 | Comments: 46 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 161 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Why are 'new' details emerging about the 2007 attack on Syria? And I doubt they are new.

    2 times in the article it is stated:
    "The U.S. was convinced by Israel's intelligence, but refused to carry out a strike- -
    "The Bush Administration felt that it "didn’t have enough evidence to justify a preemptive strike on the Al Kibar reactor, and so the Israelis began preparations for an attack on their own. "

    Interesting that it is empahsized at this time...

    Posted Sep-10-2012 By 

    (2)

  • When you see these days how Assad has no problem to massacre thousands of his people, you can realize why Israel didn't want him to have nukes...

    Posted Sep-10-2012 By 

    (1)

    • @aydeo Its a good thing Syria doesn't have nukes...I also think its a good thing Israel took out Ozirak

      Family dicatorhips/mafia's with nukes doesn't seem like a plan to me...

      Posted Sep-10-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @aydeo

      What exactly are you talking about? you do realize that terrorists are trying to overthrow the goverment right?

      Posted Sep-10-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @Bleys

      What exactly are you talking about? you do realize that terrorists don't need to overthrow a government with nukes right?

      Posted Sep-10-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @ElegantDecline Yeah, but it's a bit of a cheek to say "such and such a country can't have nuclear power in case it turns into wmd production" (re: Ozirak) when all along the Israelis were building their own nuclear weapons.

      That's called double standards. It's like most of the christians, muslims and jews on this site, they preach about how caring their religions are, yet at the first sign of militancy against their religion they become rabidly venomous toward anyone.

      I say, if you' More..

      Posted Sep-10-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @CargeLock

      OMG! you mean people have double standards when it comes to enemies and allies...... You don't say?


      facepalm

      Posted Sep-10-2012 By 

      (2)

  • This is why Israel won't bomb Iran....because if it could it would have done it by now

    All this talk is just bluff...

    Posted Sep-10-2012 By 

    (1)

    • Comment of user 'LBJFRWY' has been deleted by author!
    • @LBJFRWY
      They won't do it because Iran will most likely strike back, the only way the Israelis will do this is if they drag the US and other countries into it, like always.

      Posted Sep-10-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @LBJFRWY The point, is that they DID bomb Syria and Iraq...without all the talk and bluff we've been seeing for two years now...

      Posted Sep-10-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @LBJFRWY

      Iran would be much tougher than the other two. Distance, overflight airspace, defenses, number and depth of targets, 30,000+ Iranian missiles supplied to Hamas and Hezbollah. Not saying impossible, but there's many more factors involved.

      Posted Sep-10-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @ElegantDecline China and Russia back Iran...that's why they don't pull shit...they're not that stupid, but that's why they want the US going in first...then again, they own the US.

      Posted Sep-10-2012 By 

      (0)

  • Mossad owns the US of A..known fact!

    Posted Sep-10-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Israel denies the attack? Isn't there gunsite footage here on this site of F16's evading SAMS during the attack?

    Or is that from the Iraqi reactor bombing?

    Posted Sep-10-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Israel...One day, the US lap dog...the next, licking their own dick waiting for a cookie with a hardon. Next....

    Posted Sep-11-2012 By 

    (0)

  • First, Suter is not a standard electronic scrambling tool. It was most likely given to the Israelis by the Bush administration, and later the Bush administration was approached by congress for a violation of giving state secrets to Israel. Second, I do agree with several posters that Iran is outside of the operational airspace of Israel. To hit Syria, they had to go through Turkey, and when they exited, the strike group dropped their gas tanks, with several reports of Israeli "bombs" h More..

    Posted Sep-11-2012 By 

    (0)