Safe Mode: On
New CIA Docs Show Bush Ignored Seven Different Warnings About Imminent Attacks

Especially in light of the refusal to release the JFK assassination files, it's mind-boggling that they've finally released this information. Seven different times, Bush was informed of imminent strikes by Bin Laden, and he simply ignored them? I guess they were so determined to go to war, they wanted any excuse they could get: http://www.salon.com/2012/06/19/new_nsa_docs_reveal_911_truths/singleton/

Over 120 CIA documents concerning 9/11, Osama bin Laden and counterterrorism were published today for the first time, having been newly declassified and released to the National Security Archive. The documents were released after the NSA pored through the footnotes of the 9/11 Commission and sent Freedom of Information Act requests.

The material contains much new information about the hunt before and after 9/11 for bin Laden, the development of the drone campaign in AfPak, and al-Qaida’s relationship with America’s ally, Pakistan. Perhaps most damning are the documents showing that the CIA had bin Laden in its cross hairs a full year before 9/11 — but didn’t get the funding from the Bush administration White House to take him out or even continue monitoring him. The CIA materials directly contradict the many claims of Bush officials that it was aggressively pursuing al-Qaida prior to 9/11, and that nobody could have predicted the attacks. “I don’t think the Bush administration would want to see these released, because they paint a picture of the CIA knowing something would happen before 9/11, but they didn’t get the institutional support they needed,” says Barbara Elias-Sanborn, the NSA fellow who edited the materials.

Many of the documents publicize for the first time what was first made clear in the 9/11 Commission: The White House received a truly remarkable amount of warnings that al-Qaida was trying to attack the United States. From June to September 2011, a full seven CIA Senior Intelligence Briefs detailed that attacks were imminent, an incredible amount of information from one intelligence agency. One from June called “Bin-Ladin and Associates Making Near-Term Threats” writes that “(redacted) expects Usama Bin Laden to launch multiple attacks over the coming days.” The famous August brief called “Bin Ladin Determined to Strike the US” is included. “Al-Qai’da members, including some US citizens, have resided in or travelled to the US for years, and the group apparently maintains a support structure here,” it says. During the entire month of August, President Bush was on vacation at his ranch in Texas — which tied with one of Richard Nixon’s as the longest vacation ever taken by a president. CIA Director George Tenet has said he didn’t speak to Bush once that month, describing the president as being “on leave.” Bush did not hold a Principals’ meeting on terrorism until September 4, 2001, having downgraded the meetings to a deputies’ meeting, which then-counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke has repeatedly said slowed down anti-Bin Laden efforts “enormously, by months.”

http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/new-cia-docs-show-bush-ignored-seven-?ref=nf


Added: Jun-21-2012 Occurred On: Jun-21-2012
By: gorillabiscuits
In:
Other News, Politics, Conspiracy
Tags: 9/11, Bush Administration, CIA, National Security Archive, Military-Industrial Complex, politics
Location: United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 2403 | Comments: 69 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 2 | Shared: 17 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Invasion of Iraq was to keep the American citizens in the dark, going after WMDs which were never there was a reason for Bush Jr to win his second election term, US already suffering after 911 tragedy, then this fake war & also troops being deployed in Afghanistan just did one thing......brought the mighty US economy down to it's knees, still yet to recover...hopefully it happens soon...God bless USA.

    Posted Jun-21-2012 By 

    (5)

  • Comment of user 'Armsdealer' has been deleted by author!
  • Pretty damning...'attack coming in days', and no extra-support

    Posted Jun-21-2012 By 

    (3)

  • Comment of user 'Hazel_Nut' has been deleted by author!
  • George Tenet should be in fucking prison. I fucking hated Bush as president, but seriously, how did George Tenet escape any liability? Not only for failing to communicate the serious threat of his departments briefings and then telling W. that the case for WMD's in Iraq was a "slam dunk." Most useless CIA director ever.

    Posted Jun-21-2012 By 

    (1)

    • @Lazerhead

      Its not difficult to put the pieces of this jigsaw together as to why such confidential and damning documents have been released.

      10 years after the event, most of the 9/11 top brass in the CIA have gone, so the release of these documents are intended to allow the new Chief's to distance themselves from such negligence, and explain that they, as lower ranks, did their job effectively looking for OBL
      It's no coincidence that Obama's election campaign won't be harmed by these releas More..

      Posted Jun-21-2012 By 

      (-1)

  • Clinton did it

    Posted Jun-21-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Wait a minute...I thought you truthers said Bush demo'd those buildings...now it's back to Bush ignored terrorist threats ignored, which would mean Osama (related to Obama). Which is it truthers?

    Posted Jun-21-2012 By 

    (1)

  • ohhhh no shit Sherlock
    fuck some people are just dumb and useless

    Posted Jun-21-2012 By 

    (1)

  • We knew this;
    the silent powers told him not to worry.
    theLAB

    Posted Jun-21-2012 By 

    (1)

  • If you look at the legislation passed right after and laws, rules, agencies like the TSA, DHS, etc. it would seem that they did want it to happen, whether that means they had involvement or not, they needed an event like this to pass that legislation and further an agenda. We traded liberty for security, basically got rid of the constitution and there is no going back now. Obama had a chance to end the Patriot Act, but he renewed it, he said he would veto the NDAA and then he flipped and let it More..

    Posted Jun-21-2012 By 

    (1)

  • It's interesting that the article posted says that the CIA had OBL in it's crosshairs a full YEAR before 9/11 happened.
    Well, Bush wasn't President then, Clinton was. If Clinton hadn't sat on his ass and instead given the go ahead to take OBL out as the CIA urgently requested, 9/11 may never have happened.
    Do some research people.

    Posted Jun-21-2012 By 

    (1)

    • @squidlipz
      I actually think that OBL was hoping that Gore was going to be the President after seeing how much of a "Paper Tiger" the USA had become under Clinton's term.
      Also, it was known by the Bush Admin. and the CIA that OBL and al-Qaeda was planning some kind of attack, through intercepted communications, and breifings from the previous Admin. but they had no idea of the size and scope of what those plans were and most likely didn't think that size and type of attack was even p More..

      Posted Jun-21-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @squidlipz

      No. You do the research.
      The CIA state that under Clinton was when they got OBL in their crosshairs because of the Clinton funding..... it was only AFTER Bush took control that the money stopped, and their sights where removed.

      It was Clnton that said at the time, and since, that Iraq was insignificant, and that the CIA Intelligence would say OBL and the real threat of Al.Q was in Afghanistan.... and that has since proven to be the case.

      Posted Jun-21-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @squidlipz

      I thought Bush was a war monger? You mean he ignored 7 different warning signs to go to war? Doesn't sound like Bush right? hehehehehehe

      Posted Jun-21-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @squidlipz

      oh clinton was giving the go a "head" to take out that Ole Brunnete Lewinskys dress

      sorry couldnt resist.

      Posted Jun-21-2012 By 

      (1)

    • Comment of user 'gorillabiscuits' has been deleted by author!
  • FINALLY someone steps up. THIS IS the smoking gun BUT if the CIA knew something about it, THEY should have said something out loud. but they didn't. it was a pissing contest between the CIA, FBI, NSA and Bush's cabinet. Even congressmen knew shit was about to happen.

    Posted Jun-21-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Hind sight is always 20/20

    Posted Jun-21-2012 By 

    (1)

  • whatever.they went after Saddam,remember?they even tried to claim he was involved in 911.its all bullshit.

    Posted Jun-21-2012 By 

    (1)

    • @vargas456 your right Sadam was just a peace loving --innocent man, get over yourself .

      Posted Jun-22-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • @pimpwithalimp you simpleton.It doesnt matter if he is a saint or a psychopath,thats besides the point.If you say osama bin laden is the one that blew up the towers,then the first person you would go after would be osama bin laden.So fucking what if Saddam might have wmds(wich they never found)OSAMA JUST BLEW UP 3000 PEOPLE.is this really so hard for you to grasp?it seems pretty fucking simple to me.get over myself!?look whos talking.

      Posted Jun-22-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @pimpwithalimp pimp huh? oh,im sorry,I should get over myself before talking to a self proclaimed pimp such as yourself.you are fucking pathetic.

      Posted Jun-22-2012 By 

      (0)

  • Comment reported by LiveLeak users. This comment may violate our rules. Click here to display comment anyways