ISLAMABAD – Russia has formally conveyed to NATO that it would not allow its soil to be used for transporting NATO military supplies to Afghanistan while it (Russia) can only allow transportation of the non-military consignments across the border.
Credible diplomatic sources confided to TheNation that after unknown miscreants had torched more than three dozens NATO oil tankers in Quetta last Thursday, the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation had formally contacted the Russian Government to discuss the option of using Russian land as transit route for the transportation of NATO cargoes to Afghanistan.
Russia has reportedly conveyed to NATO that it would only allow the transportation of non-military items like food, medicines, tents and other related usable commodities and that there was not even a slightest possibility for the NATO to transport military consignments to Afghanistan via Russia.
Sources believe that Russia’s adamant stance towards NATO military cargo is embedded with mistrust that thoroughly evolves around Russia-NATO relationship.
Russia has had been accusing NATO of uncalled for interference in Eastern Europe since long. NATO’s presumed military aid to Georgia, Ukraine and Estonia is strongly opposed by Russia.
The Organisation is reportedly instrumental in flaring up Russia over territory row with Georgia as the Western military alliance backs Georgia over its claim on South Ossetia, a disputed territory between Georgia and Russia. Back in 2008, Russian forces had bombarded Georgian cities Tbilisi and Gori and South Ossetian capital Tskhinvali, over the same dispute.
Submitted by Masroor on October 13, 2010
Click to view image: 'Northern Supply Route'
By: khamomil
In: Afghanistan, Other, Middle East
Tags: Afghanistan, supply route, Russia,
Marked as: approved
Views: 10976 | Comments: 22 | Votes: 1 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
Pakistan closes NATO supply route
-
Avoiding Pakistan, New Supply Route to Afghanistan Opens By SABRINA TAVERNISE Published: March 3, 20
-
Raw Aftermath; Islamic Militants Blow Up Pakistani Supply Bridge
-
Pakistan: Key NATO supply route could reopen soon
-
Can the West avoid Russia's fate in Afghanistan?
-
French Soldiers Blow Up Russian Munitions In Afghanistan
-
Exclusive: How really looks NATO Supply route in Pakistan
-
Low Flying Back Door View
-
TOS-1 Buratino (Heavy Flamethrower System)
-
Taliban Has Bombed The Main Supply Route For Nato And US forces In Afghanistan
-
Aerial Supply Drop in Herat, Afghanistan




Bush was a god damn idiot to send our troops there and Obama has proven to be an even bigger idiot for continuing this bull shit!!!!!!!!!! I hope that fucker steps down or is ousted in 2 years just for not having the back bone to say enough and stop this crap immediately.
Posted Oct-13-2010 ByZardoz003 (1572.42) 
Zardoz003 View Channel Send Message
(3)
well said,only if more americans were opposed to the war like you
Posted Oct-14-2010 Byraf055 (5.04) raf055 View Channel Send Message
(0)
Bin Laden declared war on the US in 1998, not the other way around.
Posted Oct-15-2010 BySmall_axe (586.02) 
Small_axe View Channel Send Message
(0)
NATO means US bought out nations their agenda is Energy,and natural resources in foreign lands. Kinda like proxy armies in foreign lands with no accountability. I don't blame Russia .That is the Same NATO that Bill Clinton and Mad Albright painted US bombers blue and bombed Serbia's civilian population,
Posted Oct-14-2010 ByOnceproud (246.50) 
Onceproud View Channel Send Message
(3)
Messy article with no source and some mistakes, but the basis is true, the Russians will play this one like a fiddle...watching the same people who funded the Muj get bogged down into a war of attrition in Afghan with no sign of a breakthrough will give them the ultimate Schadenfreude...they can thank the US Reps for giving them the pleasure
Posted Oct-13-2010 ByElegantDecline (2131.98) 
ElegantDecline View Channel Send Message
(2)
hey buddy "choice" is better than "no choice" :D
Posted Oct-14-2010 Bylife4pakistan (1094.98) life4pakistan View Channel Send Message
(0)
It's to Russia's advantage to keep us fighting in Afghanistan. I don't think they want us to win or leave, just stay there with no end in sight grinding up men and equipment. They were there, and now we are in their shoes.
Same idea will have the same results. Soviets had even bigger body counts of Afghans, and still left because the body count doesn't really matter, control does.
Posted Oct-13-2010 Bybuttkracken (660.18) buttkracken View Channel Send Message
(2)
Ya I don't personally give a shit about Iraq or Afghanistan. It's killing more people than it will save. Terrorists are going to be terrorists, we don't need to send the bulk of our military to go fight some costly war for 10 years at a time. It will empty our pockets which are already only full of china's money. Even after we "liberate" these countries they are still going to be radically muslim, fuck em, come home. if they nuke a city of ours, they can kiss their world goodbye.
Posted Oct-13-2010 Bybigoleboobs (670.74) 
bigoleboobs View Channel Send Message
(2)
I agree.
Posted Oct-14-2010 ByTravis1978 (259.62) Travis1978 Send Message
(0)
this is russia's way of saying 'i told you so' to the US for supplying the mujs during the afghan soviet war.
Posted Oct-14-2010 Byfludblud (175.40) fludblud View Channel Send Message
(2)
Funny how the US wouldn't listen to the French and invaded Vietnam and got a beating; and how it wouldn't listen to the Russians and invaded Afghanistan.... and took a beating too.
Great avatar btw!
Posted Oct-14-2010 Bykhamomil (1581.24) 
khamomil View Channel Send Message
(0)
In Afghanistan, Russia fucks YOU!
Posted Oct-15-2010 BySmall_axe (586.02) 
Small_axe View Channel Send Message
(0)
This is the source to the information:
http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/Politics/13-Oct-2010/Russia-refuses-route-for-NATO-supplies
Posted Oct-13-2010 Byglobetrotter79 (1090.42) globetrotter79 View Channel Send Message
(1)
Interesting article on this subject:
> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-prados/afghanistan-handwriting-o_b_758098.html
Posted Oct-14-2010 Byglobetrotter79 (1090.42) globetrotter79 View Channel Send Message
(1)
I hope this doesn't hold up the TAPI pipeline.
Posted Oct-13-2010 Bybottomfeeder (15.48) bottomfeeder View Channel Send Message
(0)
waaaaaaah.
Posted Oct-14-2010 Byyoutubesux (272.42) 
youtubesux View Channel Send Message
(0)
I dont understand...Russians get killed by afghans each year in the Caucasus but wont allow a route because of politics. Get your fucking priorities right russia.
Posted Oct-14-2010 Byacidcasual (260.40) 
acidcasual View Channel Send Message
(-2)