Safe Mode: On
Citizen blasted for Free Speech at Public Hearing

Connecticut State Senator Ed Gomes representing Bridgeport is known for falling asleep during hearings, getting angry for having to listen to public testimony, and having to read typed up official letters of citizens regarding issues to be voted upon. [More info, click here]

In Connecticut, as in most US States, the majority of legislators can be lawyers, making money from court cases, be Free Masons, have other affiliations, have declared secret oaths that take precedent over the US Constitution, are illegally meeting with Executive Branch or Judicial Branch officials to rig legislation, break rules, obstruct justice, break up families, rip off the public, and further the aims of an international corporate and banker owned US Police State. John DiBiase Jr. gets blasted for wearing a "Court Watcher" tee-shirt getting sworn at by a taxpayer funded official, being called a racist, because he corrected another official's error in quoting a statistic.

All judges and legislators on the Judiciary Committee should have their finances, their spouse's finances, and their affiliations checked into. Most legislators on the judiciary committees should not be allowed to sit on them because of a conflict of interest. Lawyers should not legislate for lawyers to make more money. Lawyers should not pander to judges who curry them favors in court if they bend rules in the legislature. If the elected officials make money by legislating to rip the public off, they are racketeering, obstructing justice, are organized crime, and are denying citizens representation for their taxation while jailing citizens for exercising Free Speech.

Loading the player ...
Embed CodeSwitch Player
Plays: 1472 (Embed: 0)

Added: Feb-19-2012 Occurred On: Feb-15-2012
By: SvenVonErick
In:
Politics
Tags: OWS, US, banks, bankers, corporations, courts, judicial, branch, misconduct, Connecticut, New York, City, Divorce, child, custody, Martial Law, Patriot Act, ACTA, NDAA
Location: Brattleboro, Vermont, United States (load item map)
Views: 2262 | Comments: 23 | Votes: 1 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
'
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • The senator has a long history of doing a terrible job. I don't say that because it is stated above. I say it because I live in the same county(different city). Bridgeport is one of the biggest shit holes on the east coast. Politicians have failed bridgeport for more than 30 years! BTW the senator was asking if the man would where that shirt to court. Would the senator bring his filthy mouth to court?

    Posted Feb-20-2012 By 

    (3) | Report

  • Textbook - Saul Alinksy, he is a marxist (Hillary did her thesis on this dude). Who wrote a book called "Rules for Radicals" (The CONSERVATIVE UK government admit that they use Saul Alinksy's guidelines on their government website).

    Rules for Radicals:

    5: “ridicule is man’s most potent weapon” It is almost impossible to counteract ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition which then reacts to your advantage.

    Something else he wrote, concerning smear and jeer tactics
    ‘Pi More..

    Posted Feb-20-2012 By 

    (2) | Report

  • term limits. we need them big time...

    Posted Feb-20-2012 By 

    (2) | Report

  • That hearing room looks like something out of Dr. Strangelove

    Posted Feb-20-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • he shouldn't have to dig out the statistics.
    the court should have them.

    Posted Feb-20-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • Typical politician just hasseling the man and giving him the old run around.
    Ed Gomes you are a clown, give your post up to someone who can do the job right.

    Posted Feb-20-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • you know, i'm torn on this one. i want to know what that man's response was. I don't have any pretext as to the point of this man's "case". i'm with the senator right now. what point was he trying to make other than finding a statistical error? does anyone know? as the senator said, he may have a good point. but if all he was doing was finding a statistical error, then...ok. this man should have had the balls to stand up to him and tell him "hey shiteater, i just showed yo More..

    Posted Feb-20-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

    • @zenshiva
      Maybe that was his intention, but didn't know how to tell these pricks, who knows?

      Posted Feb-20-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @zenshiva the point it "officials" get up and have fake "facts" read into the records knowing they are wrong. the officials are exempt from prosecution. i think he just didnt know what to say when faced with the blatant contempt he was getting from that old fool.

      Posted Feb-20-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

  • Sounds like a cunt, to me!

    Posted Feb-20-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • wHoa- what does he say at 1:40?

    "What was the point of you fuckin' goin' and finding out the correct statistics?"

    What did he say? He couldn't have said... that...

    Posted Feb-20-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • I think that unless you were at this meeting, it would be impossible to take this clip in context. Which, makes it worthless for making a point.
    However, taking this clip as it is; The senator (who's politics and reputation I am not familiar with) is just asking a simple question. What was the point of quoting the statistics that he had? What was he getting at, and what was his purpose in researching those statistics? He did not have an answer.

    To the posters remarks in the description: The More..

    Posted Feb-20-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • Well shit....nup...i still don't give a fuck

    Posted Feb-20-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • This entire clip and article is a load of shit.

    Posted Feb-20-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • what a joke, locaL goverment...

    Posted Feb-20-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • i think you posted the wrong video. i didn't see anyone blasted for anything.

    Posted Feb-20-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • this man corrected a wrong statistic and the Senator asked "what was the point of you finding the correct statistic"..."I feel offended by it."
    basically, this guy was labeled a racist for fact-checking and being prepared

    Posted Feb-20-2012 By 

    (0) | Report