Safe Mode: On
ASSANGE: Obama's Administration was corrupted - interview by CNN



Credit CNN

Atika Shubert speaks with the founder of WikiLeaks who claims President Obama has failed to address civil liberties.

Loading the player ...
Embed Code
Plays: 244 (Embed: 0)


Loading Poll.....


Added: Oct-29-2012 Occurred On: Oct-29-2012
By: MrScabs
In: World News
Tags: Obama, Assange, corruption,
Location: London, London, City of, United Kingdom (UK/GB) (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 1296 | Comments: 37 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 2 | Shared: 2 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 3
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.

  • The 4 year 0bama fraud can be summed up by one word.
    Treason.

    Posted Oct-29-2012 By 
    Dave556 (1948.46)  

    (4)

  • "President Obama has failed to address civil liberties"?

    Wrong.

    NDAA, Patriot Act, etc.

    He most certainly HAS addressed civil liberties.

    Posted Oct-29-2012 By 
    ValleyBlacksmith (682.70)  
    ValleyBlacksmith
    View Channel
    Send Message

    (3)

  • Was?

    Posted Oct-29-2012 By 
    tncobra (320.92)  

    (2)

  • No shit!

    Posted Oct-29-2012 By 
    One Punch (894.30)  

    (1)

  • Julian who?

    Posted Oct-29-2012 By 
    ukexpat (42.30)

    (1)

  • Anyone was bugged that absolutely no information about 9/11 came out of wikileaks?

    Posted Oct-29-2012 By 
    JohnMcLane2008 (772.60)

    (1)

  • Assange is not a criminal-he simply puts out FACT that the government all want hidden -secret deals once not secret expose the corrupt ways and means of those in power

    Posted Oct-29-2012 By 
    Jegsman (270.46)  

    (1)

  • I wonder what Sam Harris has to say about ASSANGE? And who the fuck is Harris

    Posted Oct-29-2012 By 
    One Punch (894.30)  

    (0)

    • @One Punch A brilliant philosopher, writer and neurobiologist. One of the four horsemen of the atheist apocalypse. You should try reading more or engaging yourself more often in philosophical discourse.

      Posted Oct-29-2012 By 
      GiygasFetus (147.40)  

      (0)

  • I knew it! This clown is just another duped Obamabot who finally realizes that Obama is the very opposite of his promises. What an idiot!

    Posted Oct-29-2012 By 
    mikedelta12 (361.60)  

    (0)

  • as zizek put it- its one thing to know your wife is cheating on you, its another to catch her in the act.in other words the leaks revealed very little that wasnt known but the details were akin to in flagrante delicto.

    Posted Oct-29-2012 By 
    stixtoo (121.00)

    (0)

  • I thought LL were conservative republicans.

    You people always confuse me. Romney says Israel is our strongest ally, you all say down with zionist scum. This guy breaks dozens of national security acts, exposes US intelligence thus exposing our troops or foreign agents to the world and we had foreign agents killed because of this man. He could, and would have released information(if he had it) that could result in the deaths of Americans overseas and no one here cares because he's exposing More..

    Posted Oct-30-2012 By 
    docyoung (134.00)  

    (0)

    • @docyoung 1. He breaks dozens of national security acts? No he didn't, he's not American. And the country in which he received and used this information was not America. So American laws were not broken as they didn't apply.

      2. You had foreign agents killed because of this man? What were their names??? You have no clue, no one has died as a result of these leaked cables, no one has even really been displaced...

      The reason the US cannot legitimately detain him is because (in relation to the US) More..

      Posted Oct-30-2012 By 
      John Lanzer (176.90)  

      (0)

    • @John Lanzer

      http://registan.net/2010/07/30/taliban-use-wikileaks-to-hunt-murder-named-afghans/

      POW!

      Posted Oct-30-2012 By 
      docyoung (134.00)  

      (0)

    • @docyoung Hahahaha!! Lol you're not very smart are ya? Your article states that ONE man was killed, in a war zone. Imagine that? A man killed in a war zone? And here's the kicker, YOUR OWN ARTICLE states that "That is clearly not Wikileaks’ fault". You can't prove, and neither can anyone else, that his death was linked in any way, shape or form to the release of those cables. In fact, your own article states that 28 others, who's names appeared on the same files, are alive and well. More..

      Posted Nov-1-2012 By 
      John Lanzer (176.90)  

      (0)

    • @John Lanzer

      Fine fine, the link was bad, it doesn't make my argument moot though. Many were displaced and forced to leave their homes and countries due to death threats which ended any help these agents were giving us, compromising our mission. He aided our enemies, that's a fact. That's enough for me. If he had information that would lead to the deaths of American troops, he would have released it without losing a wink of sleep. It's obvious you have some sort of anti-american bias goin More..

      Posted Nov-1-2012 By 
      docyoung (134.00)  

      (0)

    • @docyoung It does make most of your argument moot, and it's the most important part that has been made as such, you claimed that it was the fact that Assange had released documents which had resulted in the death of a man, when there was no legitimate link whatsoever between the release of these cables and this man's death.

      "so it's no surprise you're willing to overlook the fact that all he accomplished is compromise our mission".
      Because your mission is absolute, right? Non waverin More..

      Posted Nov-2-2012 By 
      John Lanzer (176.90)  

      (0)

  • Things are seen only if your no blind
    theLAB

    Posted Oct-30-2012 By 
    theLAB (325.10)  

    (0)

  • a number of rights must be wronged if we are to move on
    theLAB

    Posted Nov-10-2012 By 
    theLAB (325.10)  

    (0)

  • This guy was raised in a sex/drug/brainwashing cult. What do you expect?

    Posted Oct-29-2012 By 
    grunt (481.70)  

    (-1)

    • @grunt So rather than try to logically refute his words, you reduce yourself to applying personal slander...

      'Murica....

      Posted Oct-29-2012 By 
      John Lanzer (176.90)  

      (1)

    • @John Lanzer
      When he refutes the testimony of those women he raped in Sweden, under oath, in a court, in Sweden, I'll give a shit about anything that albino sociopath says.

      Posted Oct-29-2012 By 
      grunt (481.70)  

      (-1)

    • Oh, you mean the woman who claimed he raped her, but then was snapped in a photograph smiling while posing at dinner with assange 48 hours after the alleged incident happened??

      He has told the swedes that they are quite welcome to come and question him in the Ecuadorian embassy, but they won't... Why? Well they can't extradite him to the good 'ol US unless he is physically in Sweden... He's also said that he will face charges in Sweden if they give him their assurance that he will not be extrad More..

      Posted Oct-29-2012 By 
      John Lanzer (176.90)  

      (1)

    • @John Lanzer
      He is a fugitive from Justice, Swedish Justice. Interpol has a warrant for him. If he is innocent of the charges he can go to Sweden and defend himself. It's not like Sweden is a US lapdog, by a long stretch. They have never been a ally. He is creating a straw man defense to avoid accountabilty for his crimes in Sweden.

      Posted Oct-29-2012 By 
      grunt (481.70)  

      (-1)

    • @grunt He has offered to hand himself in if a simple assurance is given that he will not be extradited to the United States.

      The Swedes refused. Tell me why?

      Posted Oct-29-2012 By 
      John Lanzer (176.90)  

      (1)

  • He's got issues with the President therefor isn't credible.

    Posted Oct-29-2012 By 
    Warrenz666 (233.90)

    (-3)