Safe Mode: On
Fed's Critics are Wrong

What was the root cause of the financial crisis? Greed? Deregulation? No. It was ignorance of financial history.


Last week the world’s central banks—including the American Federal Reserve—acted in concert to try to prevent history from repeating itself. Their critics on both sides of the Atlantic showed a dangerous ignorance, and not for the first time.

Ron Paul warned that the Fed was “flooding the world with money created out of thin air.” Paul’s remedy for our financial ills is to go back on the gold standard. More alarmingly, German Chancellor Angela Merkelreiterated her opposition to monetary easing as well as to the creation of common “euro bonds.” Her latest proposal is that each European state should set up a national debt-reduction fund.

In normal times it would be legitimate to worry about the consequences of money printing and outsize debts. But history tells us these are anything but normal times.

We teetered on the edge of this same precipice 80 years ago, in 1931. A succession of major European banks went bust. Bailing them out was beyond the resources of fiscally overstretched governments. Failure to agree on orderly debt reductions led to disorderly defaults, tariff wars, and a further worldwide collapse of production and employment.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke., Brendan Smialowski / Getty Images

People often forget that the Great Depression was like a soccer match—there were two halves. The first half was dominated by the aftermath of the 1929 U.S. stock-market crash. The second half, which made the depression truly “great” in both its depth and its extent, began with the European banking crisis of 1931.

To understand what has been happening in our own borderline depression, you need to know this history. But hardly anyone does. Since the crisis began, I’ve regularly addressed conferences of bankers, investors, fund managers, regulators, policymakers, and economists. In the first half of the crisis, I used to ask who in the room had read Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz’s Monetary History of the United States, the single most important book about American financial history ever written. On average, two people out of every hundred had read even a part of it.

These days, as we enter the second half of the crisis, I ask who has read Barry Eichengreen’s Golden Fetters: The Gold Standard and the Great Depression.The results are even worse. I’ve seen entire ballrooms full of financial professionals, not one of whom has read this hugely important book.

Friedman and Schwartz argued that the stock-market panic of 1929 turned into a depression because of avoidable errors by the Fed. Instead of easing monetary policy by cutting interest rates and buying bonds, the Fed tightened. The result was a catastrophic chain reaction of bank failures, which caused the money supply to contract by approximately a third, and economic output with it.

Eichengreen’s book tells the sorry story of the second half. First, the rules of the gold standard forced central banks to transmit the American shock around the world. Then an increasingly polarized political atmosphere made it impossible to reach agreements about the enormous war and reparations debts that weighed down European governments. Despite multiple international conferences, the global financial system collapsed. Countries recovered only when they abandoned the gold standard and focused on job creation. Unfortunately, the most effective way of doing this proved to be rearmament. The country that did this most successfully was Germany. You know what came next.

We are indeed fortunate that at least the world’s leading central bankers have studied this history: not only Ben Bernanke but also the heads of the Bank of England, the Bank of Canada, and the European Central Bank.

The bad news is that so few politicians and voters understand what they are trying to do, or why. The even worse news is that central bankers by themselves may not be able to stop our depression from turning great.



Niall Ferguson is a professor of history at Harvard University. He is also a senior research fellow at Jesus College, Oxford University, and a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University. His Latest book,Civilization: The West and the Rest, has just been published by Penguin Press.


Added: Jan-10-2012 Occurred On: Dec-5-2011
By: BigDaddyHarrison
In:
Politics
Tags: FED, Reserve, Critics, Are, Wrong, And, Kind, Of, Gay
Location: United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 1520 | Comments: 15 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • More Keynesian nonsense. The gig is up. Every country on the planet has adopted a Keynesian philosophy and now the whole world is teetering.

    10 years from now, Keynesianism will be synonymous with failure like flat earth science and fascism.

    Posted Jan-10-2012 By 

    (3)

    • @Yukon6400 Corporatism is the problem, not Keynesian economics. Deregulation helped fuel the sub-prime crisis more than GSEs and government spending. We didn't have a problem until Banks intermingling with investment firms sold risky mortgages to people securitized them and leveraged their assets 40:1. After the depression an act called Glass-Steagal prevented this kind of thing from happening, but it was repealed in the early 90's.

      Posted Jan-10-2012 By 

      (-2)

  • We spent a shit load of money we don't have, to keep this economy from going into the toilet. Whether we printed it, or borrowed it from China, doesn't
    really matter.

    Posted Jan-10-2012 By 

    (2)

  • yea "helicopter" ben shalom bernanke is who we should put all our faith in. because the international banking cartels are looking out for all of us!! they truly and deeply care about us!! yeeaa

    Posted Jan-10-2012 By 

    (2)

  • its stunning to see how stupid some of you are.

    Here's what happened, we learned about it in High School...

    1. Jimmy Carter, as president, starts the GSE program to provide lower income people with a chance at a home.
    2. Bill Clinton, as president, FORCES BANKS to underwrite and secure sub primes for low income clients because its racist if they dont.
    3. Barney Frank, who was fucking a homo lobbyist for fannie mae, covers up the scam until...

    BLAM! It all falls down, and democrat voters, dupe More..

    Posted Jan-10-2012 By 

    (2)

    • @VikingRapeSquad HMM you have no idea what you're talking about.

      1. The CRA passed under Carter only affected depository institutions and required that they give out loans in areas they operate it did not affect the majority of sub-prime loans that were given out by private institutions.

      2. Which law by Clinton forced GSE's to give out sub-prime mrotgages? Most of the private firms that gave out these Sub-prime loans did so of their own accord and if they had a problem with this why would they More..

      Posted Jan-10-2012 By 

      (-1)

  • Comment of user 'IIVXTII' has been deleted by author!
    • @IIVXTII Actually Fed governor Edward Gamlich and Brooksley Born head of the Future Commodities Trading Commission and Warren Buffet predicted that unregulated derivatives would lead to a financial disaster.

      Ron Paul's assertion that it was purley generated by a low interest rate is not correct.

      Posted Jan-10-2012 By 

      (-1)

  • That's all very well, but interest rates have been close to zero across most of the developed world since 2008! Plus Central Banks have been busy buying up bonds

    So what's Nial's solution? I think he's a historian obsessed with the War and he kind of misses those heady days

    Posted Jan-10-2012 By 

    (0)

    • @ElegantDecline That's because the emergence of huge developing countries like China and Brazil has created a huge inverse in intended savings to intended capital which is why central banks the world over started lowering their interest rates starting in the mid to late 90's

      Posted Jan-10-2012 By 

      (0)

  • Bring back Glass/Steagal

    Posted Jan-10-2012 By 

    (0)

  • They need a graph of inflation along with this graph. Somehow, I don't think the argument will be the same.

    Posted Jan-10-2012 By 

    (0)

    • @lchavezdf3 Except that after calculating for inflation most Americans are better off than they were before 1913. That's a fact. It's worse today than it was in 2000's and early 90's, but that's thanks to corporatism that allowed corporations to intermingle and leverage their assets 40:1 with other people's money.

      Posted Jan-11-2012 By 

      (0)