
I was looking thru the library of congress website for some background music and was amazed that the newest non-governmental work they had available for download was from 1919. All the others ranged from around 1890. No wonder america is the laughing stock of the world. Of course the world isn't laughing now since they have now had similar copyright laws forced on them by hollywood.
So I did a little internet search and found this interesting and extremely disheartening article regarding public domain films. Yes it's several months old but still interesting.
If anyone can convince me that copyright still serves it's original intent I'd be amazed.
Enjoy!
----
http://dagblog.com/arts-entertainment/your-new-year-public-domain-report-2012-12627
Your New Year Public Domain Report: 2012
Happy New Year, all. My spouse and I spent part of
yesterday evening at our local revival house, watching a classic New
Year's Eve double-feature of The Thin Man and After the Thin Man. Then
we adjourned to a favorite bar for midnight; after all, that's what Nick
and Nora would do.
By coincidence, midnight last night was the moment when After the Thin
Man was once set to enter the public domain. But of course, it didn't. For the 34th year in a row, nothing new entered the public domain,
which has been basically frozen in place since 1978. Under the original
copyright laws in force when it was made, After The Thin Man should
have entered public domain 19 New Year's Eves ago, during the first
second of 1993. (Obviously, the earlier Thin Man movie would have become
public domain even earlier.) A major copyright extension act in 1976
pushed that particular date back until the wee hours of this morning.
And then, of course, another copyright extension law in 1998 (the
Millennium Copyright Act or Sonny Bono Act), pushed that back for
another twenty years. So After the Thin Man will cease to be private
property on New Year's Day, 2032, 96 years after its theatrical release,
under the current schedule. Look for that date to be pushed back again
in five or six years, when Congress comes under pressure from the big
media companies to extend the copyright term another 20 or 25 years.
So there's nothing new under the public domain's
tree this year, but I'd like to list some of the movies, books, and
recordings that would have become public today, under earlier versions
of the law:
If not for the Millennium Copyright Act:
Porky Pig would enter the public domain today, as would Prokofiev's Peter and the Wolf.
Charlie Chaplin's Modern Times would enter in the public domain today,
as would Mae West's Go West, Young Man, Frank Capra's Mr. Deeds Goes to
Town, and a host of others: My Man Godfrey, Tarzan Escapes, Ballots or
Bullets, Swing Time, Intermezzo, Charlie Chan at the Opera, Reefer
Madness, Hitchcock's original Secret Agent and the original Anything
Goes.
Margaret Mitchell's Gone with the Wind was set to
exit copyright today, as was Double Indemnity, Dos Passos's The Big
Money, Faulkner's Absalom, Absalom!, Carl Sandburg's The People, Yes!,
Ayn Rand's We, the Living and of course Keynes's General Theory of
Employment, Interest, and Money.
The songs "Good Night, Irene" and "Pennies from Heaven" should have
entered public domain today, as should a bunch of other classics from
the American songbook: "A Fine Romance," "The Way You Look Tonight,"
"It's De-Lovely," "Easy to Love" and "I've Got You Under My Skin." (The
last three by Cole Porter, who was on an especially hot streak.) The
public domain should also include classical music by Bartok, Barber,
Shostakovich, Rachmaninoff, and Prokofiev, whose ballet Romeo and Juliet
appeared in the same year as his Peter and the Wolf.
According to the Sony Bono Act, all of these works are too new to enter the public domain until 2032. People need a chance to make a little money off them before that happens.
If not for the Copyright Act of 1976:
Under the copyright laws in force when they were
made, Rebel Without a Cause, Marty, The Seven-Year Itch, The Blackboard
Jungle, Lady and the Tramp, and To Catch a Thief would all have entered
public domain today. So would Davy Crockett, Guys and Dolls (with Brando
and Sinatra), Oklahoma!, Kiss Me Deadly, The Man with the Golden Arm,
East of Eden, Godzilla Raids Again and Abbott and Costello Meet the
Mummy.
Also entering public domain today would be The Lord of the Rings (whose
final volume would be leaving copyright), Moonraker, The Talented Mr.
Ripley, Cat on a Hot Tin Roof, Waiting for Godot, Notes of a Native Son,
A Good Man Is Hard to Find, William Golding's The Inheritors and
Nabokov's Lolita. (The last book was not published in an
English-speaking country until three years after the others on this
list, but was published in France, in English, in 1955.)
The musical public domain would be enriched today
by "Rock Around the Clock," "Folsom Prison Blue," "Unchained Melody,"
"Blue Suede Shoes,""Charlie Brown," "Tutti Frutti" and "Maybelline." If
early rock and roll isn't your speed, they'd be joined by a batch of
Sinatra classics: "Love and Marriage," "The Tender Trap," "In the Wee
Small Hours of the Morning," and an old Doctor Cleveland favorite,
"Learning the Blues."
However, federal law has subsequently determined that none of these works count as oldies yet. Under the current schedule, they are all slated to enter the public domain in 2051.
And of course, it might take much, much longer. All that's certain is
that next New Year's Day there will again be nothing else in the public
domain, the same way it's been since January 1, 1979. And as we approach
January 1, 2019, there will be a major campaign to keep anything from
entering public domain ever again.
By: BloodyPeasant
In: Politics
Tags: copyright, sucks
Location: Vatican City State (Holy See) (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 4621 | Comments: 52 | Votes: 1 | Favorites: 2 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 3
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
Transformers Theme Redux (and yet it still sucks!)
-
SOPA... is it really about copyright infringement?
-
MUSIC NEWS AND COPYRIGHT ISSUES
-
Fuck the USA or why the USA really sucks!
-
Latest Copyright Thug: Perez Hilton
-
The Author of SOPA Is a Copyright Violator
-
Holy See declares unique copyright on Papal figure
-
Band sings Ozzie, but really sucks.
-
Monkey Copyright??
-
American ISPs to launch massive copyright spying scheme on July 12
-
UK: BNP to Copyright Its Slogans to Stop Labour Stealing Them
-
(How To) Dispute youtube Copyright Claims



We now have a Mickey Mouse copyright law.
That is to say, every time that Mickey Mouse is set to leave copyright, Congress breaks down and extends copyright for a few more years. Congress has the power to do this. It is solely charged with setting a period of time during which people enjoy exclusive rights to their works. The problem is that none of the people who originally worked on Mickey Mouse are still alive and enjoying any benefits of it.
I am very much in support of strong intellect More..
Posted Jun-18-2012 Bybuzzardist (362.74) 
buzzardist View Channel Send Message
(7)
Fuck copyright. The pirate bay for me
Posted Jun-18-2012 Byreidy (47.70) 
reidy View Channel Send Message
(4)
Wait.
Buy.
Download online.
Take your pick.
Posted Jun-18-2012 Byzindo (796.92) zindo View Channel Send Message
(3)
@zindo
The main problem with copyright and todays media industrie is this:
Lets say i want to watch a nice movie.
Scenario 1: I can order a DVD:
Cost some $$ (i can live with that)
I must wait until it arrives (not good)
When I put it into the player, it plays for at least 5-10 minutes anoing adverts which can not be stopped and threatens to kill my grandma and remove all may property when I copy it, also not stopable for most users (At this point I usally decide never buy a DVD/Blueray again b More..
Posted Jun-18-2012 Byhhhhhaaaaa (253.44) hhhhhaaaaa View Channel Send Message
(2)
All my music is copyrighted but that doesn't stop me from releasing stuff to the public domain. It just gives me legal recourse if someone really pisses me off. An example would be using my music as a soundtrack for a film without my permission. It happened once and we worked things out without involving lawyers.
Or if Papagang fucks up a rap collaboration to one of my pieces. ;-)
As for radio royalties, the only people who play my stuff are underground/university stations who play it at 3am o More..
Posted Jun-18-2012 Bymlivsey (1104.66) 
mlivsey View Channel Send Message
(1)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJn_jC4FNDo
Posted Jun-18-2012 Bypiyoti (226.22) 
piyoti View Channel Send Message
(0)
Bring back McCarthy!
Posted Jun-18-2012 ByMENAZIKILLA (22.10) 
MENAZIKILLA View Channel Send Message
(0)
It's hard for me to imagine the level of self-entitlement required to see copyright as oppression.
Posted Jun-18-2012 Byquasimodo (353.10) quasimodo View Channel Send Message
(0)
@quasimodo It isnt about oppression you fuck knob. It is about corporate greed and the abuse of power.
Posted Jun-18-2012 ByNeo (46.30) 
Neo Send Message
(1)
@Neo So, people and corporations owning property they created or purchased from others in voluntary transactions is 'greed'? LOL. You don't have the right to other peoples stuff, period. People like you are going to eventually learn this the hard way.
Posted Jun-18-2012 Byquasimodo (353.10) quasimodo View Channel Send Message
(1)
@quasimodo I wouldn't bother with Special-Ed there... He's just a simpleton. A typical OWS retard who thinks somebody driving a nicer car is exploiting him and they should be forced to share it with him. He's a moron.
Posted Jun-18-2012 ByST0N3PONY (5076.92) 
ST0N3PONY View Channel Send Message
(0)
@quasimodo Does that mean I can't borrow from the library?
Posted Jun-18-2012 ByElegantDecline (2134.28) 
ElegantDecline View Channel Send Message
(0)
@pootin Of course 'for limited times' appears to be the operative phrase in this debate
No one is really arguing that copyright shouldn't exist
Posted Jun-18-2012 ByElegantDecline (2134.28) 
ElegantDecline View Channel Send Message
(0)
here's an idea; try creating your own music.
Posted Jun-18-2012 Bynickgj83 (419.26) 
nickgj83 View Channel Send Message
(0)
@nickgj83 A patent for an engineers invention is 20 years.Why should copyright be so different?
Posted Jun-18-2012 Byjaydenfre (319.12) jaydenfre View Channel Send Message
(1)
This is why I download most of my old movies or other rare things. If it's really cheap I don't mind paying for it.
Posted Jun-18-2012 Byjourneyman083 (139.90) journeyman083 View Channel Send Message
(0)
Star Wars will be making money forever with new re-releases in whatever the newest format happens to be, including the new "vertical" video version.
Posted Jun-18-2012 ByRhemis (981.28) 
Rhemis View Channel Send Message
(0)
Gimme. I want it all, for free.
To hell with the composers and their families.
Gimme. Now. Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!
Posted Jun-19-2012 Bygovett (944.50) govett View Channel Send Message
(0)
Are you a communist or what? You don't believe in private property?
Posted Jun-18-2012 ByST0N3PONY (5076.92) 
ST0N3PONY View Channel Send Message
(-6)
@ST0N3PONY You muppet...I guess you think public libraries are centres of illegal pirate activity as well...
Oh, and I hope you're paying for the right to post all those music vids on here right, I mean you've got members enjoying music, favoriting songs to their hearts content...all for free?
Posted Jun-18-2012 ByElegantDecline (2134.28) 
ElegantDecline View Channel Send Message
(3)
@ElegantDecline You clearly don't understand the concept of property rights. Music is pulled from youtube constantly, if the owners decide they don't want it to be shared. Liveleak also has strict guidelines regarding what they will or will not allow.
I know it's a difficult concept for a leftist to grasp, but, private property is an important right, to be protected. It's a basic human right. You really wouldn't understand, you're a leech...
Posted Jun-18-2012 ByST0N3PONY (5076.92) 
ST0N3PONY View Channel Send Message
(-2)
@ST0N3PONY Its not about LL or youtube, its about users posting material which others than enjoy with paying for it...users can download the material the sites into mp3 form and enjoy it and even exploit it...by posting hundreds of music clips here, you clearly collude in this piracy...its not my fault that you're clearly too stupid or stubborn to admit it
And LOL at the little puppy who still thinks 21stC copyright laws and grounded in Property Rights and wait for it...'human rights'
Copyrigh More..
Posted Jun-18-2012 ByElegantDecline (2134.28) 
ElegantDecline View Channel Send Message
(2)
@ElegantDecline Like I said... Leftists like yourself have never been able to grasp the concept of private property. Just like you incapable of understanding why having no free speech rights is a negative. I've seen you defend your lack of rights many times.
You're a serf.
Now go ahead and prove me right, like you always do, by ranting gibberish about how you have more rights because your government tells you what you're allowed to think.
Idiot.
Posted Jun-18-2012 ByST0N3PONY (5076.92) 
ST0N3PONY View Channel Send Message
(-2)
@ST0N3PONY Yup, keep demonstrating that you have no argument, no analysis...
The only way you even hang on in the discussions is by accusing the other person of being a 'leftist' Lol, its pathetic...
Look at you still trying to paint a post on outdated copywright laws, which even legislators in both the US and UK agree need to be reformed, as some sort of wholesale commie attack on property rights...seriously, at least grow some balls if you haven't got the brains to debate
Posted Jun-18-2012 ByElegantDecline (2134.28) 
ElegantDecline View Channel Send Message
(1)