Safe Mode: On
Obama administration ‘guts’ welfare reform with new HHS rule

By Caroline May

The Department and Health and Human Services announced the agency will issue waivers for the federal work requirement of the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program — considered a central facet of welfare reform in 1996 — Thursday.

The “Information Memorandum” states that the agency will be issuing waivers for TANF’s work participation requirements for parents and caretakers as a way to find new approaches to better employment outcomes.

“While the TANF work participation requirements are contained in section 407, section 402(a)(1)(A)(iii) requires that the state plan ‘[e]nsure that parents and caretakers receiving assistance under the program engage in work activities in accordance with section 407,’” the memo, signed by HHS Director of the Office of Family Assistance, Earl Johnson, explained. “Thus, HHS has authority to waive compliance with this 402 requirement and authorize a state to test approaches and methods other than those set forth in section 407, including definitions of work activities and engagement, specified limitations, verification procedures, and the calculation of participation rates.”

The goal, according to the memo, is to improve employment outcomes by “encouraging states to consider new, more effective ways to meet the goals of TANF, particularly helping parents successfully prepare for, find, and retain employment.” HHS will also require states to provide a method for evaluation and monitor progress.

A notice to state human service officials, also sent Thursday from George Sheldon, Acting Assistant Secretary for Administration for Children and Families at HHS, explained further that waivers will be considered on a case-by-case basis and that the impetus for the decision originated from a February 28, 2011 Presidential Memorandum that directed federal agencies to identify “barriers in Federally funded programs that currently prevent states, localities, and tribes, from efficiently using tax dollars to achieve the best results for their constituents.”

“The Administration for Children and Families took this charge seriously and held a series of consultation meetings with states, tribes, and territories on a variety of topics including TANF. During those consultations, many jurisdictions expressed a strong interest in greater flexibility in TANF and indicated that greater flexibility could be used by states to improve program effectiveness,” Sheldon’s notice explained. “We also heard concerns that some TANF rules stifle innovation and focus attention on paperwork rather than helping parents find jobs.”

The move has some concerned, however, that the Obama administration is weakening or even violating the welfare reform law of 1996.

According to Republican Study Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, the memorandum is proof of the Obama administration’s continued disrespect for the rule of law.

“President Obama just tore up a basic foundation of the welfare contract,” Jordan said in a statement. “In exchange for taxpayer-funded TANF payments, the law calls on able-bodied adults to work, look for work, take classes, or undergo drug and alcohol counseling. It’s the tough love that gives people motivation to help themselves…Today’s action is also a blatant violation of the law. After immigration, education, marriage, and religious conscience protections, we can now add welfare reform to the list of laws President Obama refuses to follow.”

The American Thinker reported Friday that House Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp and the Ranking Member on the Senate Finance Committee Orrin Hatch sent a letter to HHS Secretary Sebelius Thursday expressing “deep concern” about the memo and demanding a legal reasoning behind the guidance by Monday.

“Simply put, if Congress had intended to allow waivers of TANF work requirements, it would have said so in the statute,” the pair wrote. “Instead, Congress did the exact opposite and explicitly prohibited waivers to section 407 work requirements among other sections of the Social Security Act.”

Robert Rector, The Heritage Foundation’s senior research fellow on domestic policy and Katherine (Kiki) Bradley, former associate director of the federal TANF program and Heritage fellow further postulated that the new directive signals an end to the 1996 reforms.

“The new welfare dictate issued by the Obama Administration clearly guts the law,” Rector and Bradley wrote at The Foundry. “The Administration tramples on the actual legislation passed by Congress and seeks to impose its own policy choices—a pattern that has become all too common in this Administration. The result is the end of welfare reform.”

After the rule change, House Speaker John Boehner released a statement condemning the move.

“By gutting the work requirements in President Clinton’s signature welfare reform law, President Obama is admitting his economic policies have failed,” Boehner wrote.

“While President Clinton worked with Congress in a bipartisan way on welfare reform and economic opportunity, President Obama has routinely ignored Republican proposals, rejected House-passed jobs bills, and imposed an agenda that’s helped keep the unemployment rate above eight percent for 41 months. Instead of working with Republicans to boost job creation, the president is simply disregarding the requirement that welfare recipients find work,” he continued.

Boehner concluded, “Welfare reform was an historic, bipartisan success – this move by the Obama administration is a partisan disgrace.”


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/13/hhs-to-offer-waivers-for-tanf-work-requirement/#ixzz20WgY015e


Added: Jul-13-2012 Occurred On: Jul-13-2012
By: marc1921
In:
Politics
Tags: obummer, buys, more, votes
Location: Washington, District of Columbia, United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 1044 | Comments: 21 | Votes: 2 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 7 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • I don't "get" how the administration has the right to go rogue like this.

    Deciding to ignoring border laws
    Deciding not to enforce the The Defense of Marriage Act
    and now this.

    Are we a "nation of laws"? or are we just a "nation of laws we like"?

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (8)

    • @wharris

      What would Hugo Rafael Chávez do?

      Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

      (3)

    • @Arizona_Patriot

      This.

      In other words, whatever the hell he wanted to.

      Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

      (4)

    • @wharris
      As long as the imbeciles keeping a choke-hold on votes in the Senate keep the choke-hold, Obama can do practically anything he wants.

      The House could retaliate by withholding funds--which may be what Obama wants; give him something else to campaign on and beat over the heads of Republicans. But I think it will backfire on him.

      Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @moanranger 23 seats are up for election come nov. You can bet harry will take his seat as minorty whip just like polsi did in the house!

      Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

      (0)

  • “Simply put, if Congress had intended to allow waivers of TANF work requirements, it would have said so in the statute,” the pair wrote. “Instead, Congress did the exact opposite and explicitly prohibited waivers to section 407 work requirements among other sections of the Social Security Act.”
    great leader spits in our face again.

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (7)

  • Undoing a great a example of poltical cooperation that majorly helped the economy and was the apitomy of the abandonment of partisan politics during the Clinton administration.

    Now, it's gone. Obama is such an ignorant, partisan asshole.

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (7)

  • PLEASE will the members of the house or senate or congress or whoever-please grow some balls and take action against Obama for violating written laws!

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (6)

  • Hopefully this guy will be gone in 2013.

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (3)

  • Oh yeah, he's gone now. Four and out.

    It is quite possible Obama is convinced he's not winning a second term. So why not conjure the ghost of LBJ, and resurrect Great Society? What's there to lose?

    I just hope the Republic is able to survive through the lingering stench of this incompetent rabble-rouser.

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (3)

  • Can't wait to gut obama out of the WH in November.

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (3)

  • he's obviously trying to appeal to his voters...porch sitting welfare monkeys, how else can he make them happy? free money and you don't even have to do anything all month but pick up your welfare cheque. oh and don't forget to vote for obozo for more free handouts.... what a joke. I'm not even from the USA and I hope he's gone soon.

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (2)

  • FREE FOR YOU
    VOTES FOR ME
    COSTS US ALL

    What a sales pitch
    theLAB

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (2)

  • He know he's gone, and wants to stir up as much hatred as he can. He wants riots in the streets on his way out the door. I'll be making like a Korean shop owner when it happens.

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (2)

  • The weird part is that welfare reform was, like, a posterchild for effective governance. EVERYBODY was proud of that bill. It ended up with a 256-170 House Vote, a 74-24 Senate Vote, and then President Clinton signing it while smiling and shaking hands with Newt Gingrich.

    For years afterwards, people in both parties cited welfare reform as an example of politicians putting aside their partisanship and really, genuinely working together in good faith in the interest of the country.

    And Kathleen More..

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (1)

  • A lesson in irony.


    The Food Stamp Program, administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, is actually proud of the fact it is distributing the greatest amount of free meals and food stamps ever.
    Meanwhile, the National Park Service, administered by the U.S. Department of the Interior, asks us to "Please Do Not Feed the Animals." Their stated reason for the policy is because the animals will grow dependent on handouts and will not learn to take care of themselves.
    This ends today More..

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (1)

  • This is a clarion call to the men and women of the United States of America: make a stand NOW. You must make a peaceful and civil stand now! When you stand you shall stand upon the Constitution. We The People must say enough is enough! We have had enough of the Executive branch going around the Legislative Branch.

    President Obama's motivations matter not. The results of his actions matter not. The methods that Obama has used to impose his will are unacceptable. We have a Law and limits o More..

    Posted Jul-14-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Don't worry. When the next president gets into office, all of obongos crap will be undone. All of it.

    Posted Jul-14-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Aww that’s wrong feeding the needy family.

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (-1)