Safe Mode: On
NASA Spacecraft Images Offer Sharper Views of Apollo Landing Sites

NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) captured the sharpest images ever taken from space of the Apollo 12, 14 and 17 landing sites. Images show the twists and turns of the paths made when the astronauts explored the lunar surface.

At the Apollo 17 site, the tracks laid down by the lunar rover are clearly visible, along with the last foot trails left on the moon. The images also show where the astronauts placed some of the scientific instruments that provided the first insight into the moon's environment and interior.

"We can retrace the astronauts' steps with greater clarity to see where they took lunar samples," said Noah Petro, a lunar geologist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., who is a member of the LRO project science team.

All three images show distinct trails left in the moon's thin soil when the astronauts exited the lunar modules and explored on foot. In the Apollo 17 image, the foot trails, including the last path made on the moon by humans, are easily distinguished from the dual tracks left by the lunar rover, which remains parked east of the lander.

"The new low-altitude Narrow Angle Camera images sharpen our view of the moon's surface," said Arizona State University researcher Mark Robinson, principal investigator for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC). "A great example is the sharpness of the rover tracks at the Apollo 17 site. In previous images the rover tracks were visible, but now they are sharp parallel lines on the surface."

At each site, trails also run to the west of the landers, where the astronauts placed the Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) to monitor the moon's environment and interior.

This equipment was a key part of every Apollo mission. It provided the first insights into the moon's internal structure, measurements of the lunar surface pressure and the composition of its atmosphere. Apollo 11 carried a simpler version of the science package.

One of the details that shows up is a bright L-shape in the Apollo 12 image. It marks the locations of cables running from ALSEP's central station to two of its instruments. Although the cables are much too small for direct viewing, they show up because they reflect light very well.

The higher resolution of these images is possible because of adjustments made to LRO's orbit, which is slightly oval-shaped or elliptical. "Without changing the average altitude, we made the orbit more elliptical, so the lowest part of the orbit is on the sunlit side of the moon," said Goddard's John Keller, deputy LRO project scientist. "This put LRO in a perfect position to take these new pictures of the surface."

The maneuver lowered LRO from its usual altitude of approximately 31 miles (50 kilometers) to an altitude that dipped as low as nearly 13 miles (21 kilometers) as it passed over the moon's surface. The spacecraft has remained in this orbit for 28 days, long enough for the moon to completely rotate. This allows full coverage of the surface by LROC's Wide Angle Camera. The cycle ends today when the spacecraft will be returned to its 31-mile orbit.


"These images remind us of our fantastic Apollo history and beckon us to continue to move forward in exploration of our solar system," said Jim Green, director of the Planetary Science Division at NASA Headquarters in Washington.

LRO was built and managed by Goddard. Initial research was funded by the Exploration Systems Mission Directorate at NASA Headquarters. In September 2010, after a one-year successful exploration mission, the mission turned its attention from exploration objectives to scientific research in NASA's Science Mission Directorate.

Loading the player ...
Embed Code
Plays: 2864 (Embed: 0)

Added: Sep-7-2011 Occurred On: Sep-7-2011
By: fern420
In:
Other News
Tags: moon, Apollo, laning, photo, orbiter
Location: United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 4275 | Comments: 31 | Votes: 4 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 2 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Sadly, there are those that insist that, regardless of pics, we couldn't have landed on the moon. They always talk about our limited technology, the Van Allen belt etc etc. They just won't be swayed.

    Posted Sep-7-2011 By 

    (5)

  • Well it goes to show ya....we litter every where we go!!!!

    Posted Sep-7-2011 By 

    (4)

  • How are the conspiracy theorists going to get round this one?

    Posted Sep-7-2011 By 

    (3)

  • I wonder what the conspiracy wingnuts are going to say about this. Great find/post, fern.

    Posted Sep-7-2011 By 

    (3)

  • "It's all about context."

    Great vid, Thanks.

    Posted Sep-7-2011 By 

    (2)

  • i bet the hoax assholes are feeling pretty much fucking stupid at the moment huh?

    i dont see too many of those flakes jumping up and down in the comments box here. LOL

    FOOLS

    Posted Sep-7-2011 By 

    (2)

  • FAKE! PHOTOSHOPPED! THE SAME PERSON WHO MADE THESE PHOTOSHOP FLEW PLANES INTO THE TWIN TOWERS! WE HAVE UFO'S AT AREA 51!

    ^^^Saved the nutjobs some time....

    Posted Sep-7-2011 By 

    (2)

  • So with what kind of explanation will the moonbats and tinfoil hats douchebags will come up with now to discredit the Apollo astronauts?

    Posted Sep-7-2011 By 

    (1)

  • Damn we are messy.

    Posted Sep-7-2011 By 

    (0)

  • Now maybe this will make the moon "hoaxers" shut up? I always thought we put men on th moon, it's not rocket science! Oh wait...

    Posted Sep-7-2011 By 

    (0)

  • SUCK THAT DICK AMERICA HATERS!! SUCK IT GOOD YOU LIKE THAT DONT YEA!!??

    AGHHAHAHAH!!

    Posted Sep-7-2011 By 

    (0)

  • Not calling this fake but guess Ill be the jerk on this... these pics are garbage. I dont get how scientists can build spy satellites that can see a flea on a dogs back from space, or build the Hubble telescope that can see across deep space but they cant get a clear crisp close up pic of moon landing sites.

    Posted Sep-7-2011 By 

    (0)

    • @aa316
      No real reason to waste money to do it. No political or strategic reason to do it. No real scientific reason to do it (we know where all the craters are) Why spend millions of dollers for no reason?

      Posted Sep-7-2011 By 

      (0)

    • @Rob8729 Millions of dollars for no reason? What do you call the war on drugs? What do you call the Iraq war? Afghan war? Libyan war? Bank bailouts?

      Why NOT spend the money to prove that we did make it to the moon.

      aa316 makes a good point. We can see someone take a shit from space, but we cant turn that camera around for a close up of the moon.

      Posted Sep-7-2011 By 

      (-3)

    • @aa316
      *sigh*...

      The Hubble Telescope has a maximum angular resolution of 50 milliarcseconds. An Apollo lander, 30 feet wide landing pad to opposite landing pad, has a maximum apparent angular width of about 5 milliarcseconds, as seen from Earth.

      The Hubble would need a whole magnitude improvement in resolution to even detect the presence of an Apollo lander.

      Posted Sep-7-2011 By 

      (2)

    • @Thetruth


      we don't need to prove shit, the proof is all there,has been for 40 years, there are just people who wouldn't know a dog if it bit them on the ass.

      totally different optics needed though to look at the moon and look at the earth, you cant just turn around a satellite, it wouldn't show you much

      Posted Sep-7-2011 By 

      (0)

    • @aa316

      There are no satellites that can "see a flea on a dogs back", and there are no telescopes that are capable of "seeing" the remnants of the Apollo missions that remain on the Moon's surface. Even the most powerful of our time. I know this seems counter-intuitive, but when you understand optics, and the massive scales of the distances involved, relative to the size of such small objects you'll understand.

      You're not a jerk.

      Posted Sep-7-2011 By 

      (-1)

  • How much fuel would they have needed to get of the place ?

    Posted Sep-7-2011 By 

    (0)

  • FAKE!!! j/k :P

    Posted Sep-7-2011 By 

    (-1)

  • it's an easy thing to fake

    Posted Sep-7-2011 By 

    (-3)