Safe Mode: On
McCain: a "realistic idelaist" or a dangerous ideologue?

Having cheerfully confessed he knows little about economics, John McCain is advancing himself as a foreign-policy president, a "realistic idealist," he told the World Affairs Council of Los Angeles.

But judging from the content of his speech, McCain is no more a realist than he is a reflective man.

Speaking of the five-year war in Iraq, McCain declares, "It would be an unconscionable act of betrayal, a stain on our character as a nation, if we were to walk away from the Iraqi people and consign them to the horrendous violence, ethnic cleansing, and possible genocide that would follow a reckless, irresponsible and premature withdrawal."

Fair point. There is surely a great risk in a too rapid withdrawal.

But if a U.S. withdrawal, after 4,000 dead and 33,000 wounded, and a trillion dollars sunk, runs the risk of a genocidal calamity, what does that tell us about the wisdom of those who marched America into this war?

What threat did Saddam ever pose comparable to the cataclysm McCain says the U.S. faces if it pulls out? Who, senator, put American on the horns of so horrible a dilemma?

"Whether they were in Iraq before is immaterial," McCain warns, "Al Qaeda is there now." And that is surely true.

But if Al Qaeda was not in Iraq before the U.S. invaded, why did we invade? And if Al Qaeda is there now, what was the magnet that drew them in, if not the U.S. occupation McCain himself championed?

Like Condi Rice, who regularly disparages the policies of every president from FDR to Bill Clinton, McCain enjoys parading the higher morality of his devotion to democracy-über-alles.

"For decades in the Middle East we had a strategy of relying upon autocrats to provide order and stability. We relied on the shah, the autocratic rulers of Egypt, the generals of Pakistan, the Saudi royal family. ... We can no longer delude ourselves that relying on these outdated autocrats is the safest bet."

Speaking of self-delusion, does McCain believe the "democrats" lately elected in Pakistan will be tougher on Al Qaeda and the Taliban than Pervez Musharraf, who has twice escaped assassination for having sided with the United States?

Does McCain think this new crowd in Islamabad will be more pro-American than the general, when the people who voted them in are among the most anti-American in the Islamic world?

From Richard Nixon to George Bush I, the United States expelled Moscow from Egypt, won the Cold War, brought peace between Egypt and Israel, and created a worldwide alliance, including Hafez al-Assad of Syria, that drove Saddam's army out of Kuwait.

What has the Bush-McCain democracy crusade produced, save electoral victories for the Muslim Brotherhood, Hezbollah and Hamas? And if Washington dumps the sultan of Oman, President Mubarak, and the king of Saudi Arabia, who does McCain think will replace them?

If undermining Arab autocrats is good for America, why is that also the goal of Osama bin Laden?

McCain proposes a "League of Democracies" to unite a hundred nations for peace and freedom. "Revanchist Russia," however, is to be blackballed from McCain's league and thrown out of the G-8.

What would this accomplish other than undoing the work of Ronald Reagan in bringing Moscow in from the cold, driving Russia into the arms of China, restarting the Cold War and recreating the Beijing-Moscow axis it was Nixon's great achievement to break up?

What McCain is proposing is a redivision of the world into the forces of light and the forces of darkness. Moral clarity at last! Has he forgotten the fate of that earlier rabbit warren of the righteous, the League of Nations?

Does our "realistic idealist" think a NATO of 25 nations that has mustered a piddling 16,000 soldiers, most of them non-combatants, to stand beside America in Afghanistan is going to confront a nuclear-armed Russia?

"Nations have no permanent friends and no permanent enemies. Only permanent interests," said Lord Palmerston.

What is critical, especially in wartime, is not whether a regime is autocratic or democratic, but whether it is hostile or friendly.

George Washington, at war with democratic Great Britain, is said to have danced a jig when he heard the United States had Louis XVI as an ally. During the Civil War, Britain built blockade-runners for the Confederacy, while the czar docked his ships in Union harbours. Russia "was our friend/When the world was our foe," wrote Oliver Wendell Holmes.

When Nixon launched his airlift to save Israel in the Yom Kippur War, autocratic Portugal let the U.S. use the Azores. Democratic France denied Reagan overflight permission in the 1986 raid on Libya. Two U.S. pilots died as a result.

When McCain was in the Hanoi Hilton, British and French ships were unloading goods in Haiphong, while Ferdinand Marcos and the South Korean generals sent troops to fight beside American forces.

To root one's attitude toward nations based on their internal politics rather than their foreign policies is ideology. And policies rooted in ideologies, from Trotskyism to democratism, end up on the Great Barrier Reef of reality.

By Patrick Buchanan

Source


Click to view image: '172622-mccain_nov07.jpg'

Added: Apr-13-2008 
By: Larson_01
In:
Iraq, Afghanistan, News
Tags: McCain, elections, republicans, conservatives, neocon, Russia, China, Iraq
Views: 3630 | Comments: 11 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 1 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
'
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • How about just a waffling simpleton who is trying to sell himself as a conservative-a 'Reagan conservative' -baahahahahahaaa

    This election cycle is embarrassing and sad. Mccain knows less about conservatism than Bush knew about grammar.

    Posted Apr-13-2008 By 

    (1) | Report

  • the Republicans have been great at generating more and more enemies for the United States since Bush has been at the helm

    let's hope that November will be the end of an era -- the Bullshit Era, if you will

    they are nothing but warmongering fools -- rich fools, though

    Posted Apr-13-2008 By 

    (0) | Report

  • ^they not being the entire Republican Party but the neoconservatives in the Republican Party and all the Republican sheep that say "baa!" whenever the neocons tell them to

    bunch of cowards -- like the Democrats that won't impeach Bush or fight hard against Republicans with neoconservative values

    Posted Apr-13-2008 By 

    (0) | Report

  • McCain in a land slide over the Racist

    Posted Apr-13-2008 By 

    (0) | Report

  • godhimself: "
    Gp83: "McCain in a land slide over the Racist"
    says the homophobe...



    ."
    Says the liberal

    Posted Apr-13-2008 By 

    (0) | Report

  • Something to note about McCain He is not just being modest when he says he knows little about economics. The economic problems we are having are the result of deregulation of the new "shadow" banking industry. The primary politician responsible for it is Phil Gramm back in the late eighties. Today Phil Gramm is McCain's chief economic advisor and he hasn't learned his lesson yet in spite of things

    Posted Apr-13-2008 By 

    (0) | Report

  • ...And less about basic economic principles than bush knew about 20th century political history.

    Strap on your seat belt, dump your dollar based holdings, and get yourself a plan B somewhere else. The 2012 election cycle will prove your vote is totally useless.

    Posted Apr-13-2008 By 

    (0) | Report

  • Adolph Hitler was a Realist Idealist too!

    Posted Apr-14-2008 By 

    (0) | Report

  • i keep seeing impeach Bush.....well that hard to do since he hasnt done anything to get inpeached

    Posted Apr-14-2008 By 

    (0) | Report

  • keithgeorge1: "i keep seeing impeach Bush.....well that hard to do since he hasnt done anything to get inpeached"
    Hmmmm....how about selling false evidence to the American people to drag into an unconstitutional war that most of the world hates us for, creating enemies for the next century.-and doubling the national debt from 5.7 trillion to over 10 trillion.

    -all because he wanted to take out Saddam in a family revenge over his daddy.

    Posted Apr-14-2008 By 

    (0) | Report