The BBC was today forced to admit to another phone-in scandal in which £106,000 that should have gone to charity was in fact banked by the corporation.
Viewers who called to take part in fundraising phone-ins but whose calls were made just after the lines had closed, were still charged for the call but a BBC subsidiary hung onto the money.
Sir Michael Lyons, the chairman of the BBC trust, which uncovered the practise, said that this was "a serious failure". He added: "This did not help the BBC or the people we serve."
Sir Michael ordered the corporation to hand over the cash due to the charities with interest resulting in a payment of £123,000, and said that disciplinary action could follow.
The phone calls were handled by a BBC subsidiary called Audiocall, part of the BBC's commercial arm. It organised phone-ins for the majority of the BBC's fundraisers - which include programmes such as Children in Need. It is understood that there were problems with over a dozen programmes.
The BBC also had to admit that it had left out £6,000-worth of phone-in votes in this year's British heat of the Eurovision Song Contest. One of the programme's presenters - Sir Terry Wogan and Fearne Cotton - mistakenly called for votes before the phone lines had opened and while callers were charged, their votes were not counted.
Sir Michael said that the mistake did not affect the results of the competition, which was won by boy-girl band Scooch. However, it is a further embarrassment for a programme which saw Sir Terry mistakenly announce the wrong winner at the end of the show.
The BBC's revelations come just a day after ITV admitted that a comedy award was wrongly presented to Ant and Dec when viewers had voted for Catherine Tate instead. ITV was also fined £5.7million by regulator Ofcom for a string of other phone-in breaches.

Click to view image: '180584-0911wogancotton_335094a1.jpg'
By: PiRaTeCoPy
In: News
Tags:
Marked as: approved
Views: 6860 | Comments: 15 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
14 sightings of Maddie in Malta
-
Death in slow motion: Part 2 of 3 in a special report on the Church of Scientology
-
US defends detention of children in Iraq
-
Pilot survives the fall of airplane in Fort Lauderdale, USA
-
Pakistani tribes and Leaders of Taliban in Pakistan threaten military operations against the army an
-
Slaughter of Foreigners in Yemen Bears Mark of Former Gitmo Detainee, Say Experts
-
Iran accuses US of terrorism in Iraq UPDATE
-
Britain falls to 25th best place to live in the world... behind Lithuania, the Czech Republic and Hungary
-
China detained parents of children sickened by melamine
-
85,000 Iraqis killed in violence from 2004-2008
-
Chicken is born with foot of duck in Colombia





The BBC is a national disgrace. It was infiltrated by hard-line communist in the 1960s and has never been the same since. It is the enemy within this county and does not speak for the average British person in anyway. Its always funny how non British people hold the BBC as a gold standard for freedom and impartial news.
At least with FOX the propaganda is easy to spot, the BBC are masters of multi-layered propaganda and spin.
Posted May-9-2008 ByPanda07 (211.32) 
Panda07 View Channel Send Message
(1)
Wow the BBC steals and is bisased and hates Jews anything else?
Posted May-9-2008 Byjeddddd (33.52) jeddddd View Channel Send Message
(0)
LOL where did u get that from that the BBC hates Jews...its like u saying FOX hates jews.
Posted May-9-2008 ByUrMumChickenSoup (24.52) 
UrMumChickenSoup View Channel Send Message
(0)
they are not called al-bbc over here because of their love of the chosen people. And by the way Fox hates any thing not neo con
Posted May-9-2008 Byjeddddd (33.52) jeddddd View Channel Send Message
(0)
LOL the jews CONTROL the media you brainwashed douche bag.
Posted May-9-2008 ByKiloByte69 (54.44) KiloByte69 Send Message
(0)
it makes you wonder if civilization is really worth saving sometimes.
Posted May-9-2008 ByDawsopolis (1618.64) 
Dawsopolis Send Message
(0)
No kidding. When you steal from people that don't have anything, it looks grim for humanity.
Audicall did handle the calls, so blame should rest heavily on them. BBC should be forced to have a "regime change" hehe.
Posted May-9-2008 Byiwillundoyou (15.30) 
iwillundoyou View Channel Send Message
(0)
BBC World is a great news organization I have it saved as my home page. Good overview on international events. Not my sole source of info, of course. But generally good.
the way the site is organized is commendable as well
http://news.bbc.co.uk/
even if you don't agree with their point of view you can still get a lot of information all at once when the site is well organized
Posted May-9-2008 Bylasrever (5338.10) lasrever View Channel Send Message
(0)
your natural generosity of spririt does the bbc an undeserved favour.............youll find that service brim full with despise able folk, and the 24 netword often looks like a freak show, with the odds and ends of physical spectrum that wont ever in a month of sundays get the chance to weild their slimy half good reading of surface gloss on the mainstream bbc. the more you find other sources the more the bbc will come to matter less...isolate and examine its window dressing on its site to try t More..
Posted May-9-2008 Byboredhousewife (39.46) boredhousewife View Channel Send Message
(-1)
BBC World is my home page but not the sole source of my info -- as i said i use it as an 'overview', a quick glance, at world events.
when i see a story on BBC world that i find interesting i read it and then find the same story across other news sites, at random, to see different points of view. oftentimes i get a more detailed version of what happened that way. occasionally i see contradictions in facts between BBC and another site. if i see a contradiction i keep following the story through More..
Posted May-9-2008 Bylasrever (5338.10) lasrever View Channel Send Message
(-1)
:^)
Posted May-9-2008 Byboredhousewife (39.46) boredhousewife View Channel Send Message
(0)
they need to answer to shareholders. Kids be damned!
Posted May-9-2008 Bynattyroots (481.16) nattyroots View Channel Send Message
(0)
1) This should be considered fraud and prosecuted as such. 2) Yes the BBC has a point of view. So what? All journalists and news organiszations have a pont of view. Only in the US do we continue the sharade of "objective" news gathering. No such animal. We are all products of our environment and see the world through our experiences. The BBC is made up of left leaning journalists... and rightly so. That is also their prime audience. Big deal.
Posted May-9-2008 Bycirvine11 (443.42) 
cirvine11 View Channel Send Message
(0)
"This should be considered fraud and prosecuted
as such"... agreed
Posted May-9-2008 ByPiRaTeCoPy (3108.04) PiRaTeCoPy Send Message
(0)