Liveleak.com - Redefining the Media

German Parliament Extends Afghanistan Mission

Afghanistan | 12.10.2007

Despite public opposition, over 75 percent of Germany's lower house voted on Friday, Oct. 12, to extend the country's mission in Afghanistan by one year.

In a sweeping majority, 454 parliamentarians in Germany's Bundestag, the lower house of parliament, voted to continue Germany's military action in Afghanistan. Seventy-nine voted "no" and 48 abstained.

Fore More..


Added: Oct 12 2007   In: news_politics,middle_east

By: Ediman  Germany

  • Views: 2275 |
  • Votes: 0 |
  • Recommendations: 0 |
  • Comments: 13

Comments - sort by newest to oldest

  • People should remember that Iraq and Afghanistan are two totally different ball games.

    Iraq "might" be an illegal operation (IMHO), and perhaps is tainted by ulterior motives.

    Afghanistan on the other hand ... is a fight between the world and "Terry Taliban" ... the bastards who sent Afghanistan back to the 1700's and supported the terrorists that perpetrated 9/11.

    Germany is right for supporting continued work in Afghanistan, the job is not complete.

    Posted Oct-12-2007 by "l8rm8e" (R) Australia

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
  • I'm just sick of war. Let's get this done right for once and for all.

    Posted Oct-12-2007 by "unix-spider" (R) United States

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
  • Bang on, Afghanistan isn't Iraq and I'm glad the Germans are there supporting NATO allies for another year!

    Posted Oct-12-2007 by "geshtunga" (R) Canada

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
  • Glad to have the Bundeswehr still standing beside us.

    Posted Oct-12-2007 by "benerval" (R) United States

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
  • i think besides sending soldiers our govt should put even more emphasis in restructuring and educational programs. this is the only way of reducing the influence of the taliban within the population on the long run...

    Posted Oct-12-2007 by "thetis" (R) Germany

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
  • Quoted comment by thetis: i think besides sending soldiers our govt should put even more emphasis in restructuring and educational programs. this is the only way of reducing the influence of the taliban within the population on the long run...

    true

    Posted Oct-12-2007 by "cygiso" (R) Germany

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
  • Quoted comment by thetis: i think besides sending soldiers our govt should put even more emphasis in restructuring and educational programs. this is the only way of reducing the influence of the taliban within the population on the long run...

    Very well said indeed.

    Helping them also meet some of thier agricultural needs and getting those farmers more money will also derail the Taliban.

    The farmers grow Opium (which NATO doesn't like) because the Taliban pay more for the Drugs than the Government does the food.

    Posted Oct-12-2007 by "RoughRider1" (R) United States

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
  • fools



    Posted Oct-13-2007 by "ssauga" (R) Canada

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
  • Quoted comment by thetis: i think besides sending soldiers our govt should put even more emphasis in restructuring and educational programs. this is the only way of reducing the influence of the taliban within the population on the long run...

    a problem is the medieval culture and how they treat well meant "restructuring" and investments in their country.

    they have no economics ..only selling opium, and clan wars, and a strong "i give a shit" morality.

    the problem is we have 2007, and they are still somewhere in 1500, so restructuring and such, could take around 500 years until they get the idea or a clue of economics and sociality and democracy.

    Posted Oct-14-2007 by "wantusrie" (R)

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
  • Quoted comment by RoughRider1:
    Quoted comment by thetis: i think besides sending soldiers our govt should put even more emphasis in restructuring and educational programs. this is the only way of reducing the influence of the taliban within the population on the long run...

    Very well said indeed.

    Helping them also meet some of thier agricultural needs and getting those farmers more money will also derail the Taliban.

    The farmers grow Opium (which NATO doesn't like) because the Taliban pay more for the Drugs than the Government does the food.

    NATO doesn't like the Opium, right... but the CIA

    Posted Oct-15-2007 by "eSurgent" (B) Germany

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
  • I like it.

    Posted Oct-16-2007 by "bravo61" (R) United States

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
  • The thing is that an afghan farmer can make about 70 times more money with opium than he could with food. They would be pretty dumb if they would no try. The other problemis that especially the german government tries to sell it as peacekeeping. Nobody wants to use the word "war". Though it for sure is a war. Most people reject the mission and because of that the necessary steps can not be taken. We need much more troops in Afg. The Italians got about 250 soldiers that they can send on patrol. In an area half as big as Italy! How can you be surprised by the fact that the enemy controls large parts of the country? I am glad we will be there for at least another year.But we have to stop reacting to the enemy and being passive. Also our politicians need to understand that you can not win the fight til you finally start to kill some bad guys.

    Posted Oct-17-2007 by "baba85" (R) Germany

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
  • come home save!!

    Posted Oct-22-2007 by "Anthraxid" (R) Germany

    Good comment!  Bad comment! (0)
« Previous  1  Next »
You need a registered account to make comments!

Advertisers