RAAF Pilot Belly Lands his F-111 Aardvark
He only had a few hours on the type.
Loading the player ...
Added: Jun-6-2012
By: gnark1ll
In: WTF, Other Entertainment, Weapons
Tags: f111 aardvark, crash land, RAAF, australian
Marked as: approved
Views: 1877 | Comments: 34 | Votes: 4 | Favorites: 5 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
By: gnark1ll
In: WTF, Other Entertainment, Weapons
Tags: f111 aardvark, crash land, RAAF, australian
Marked as: approved
Views: 1877 | Comments: 34 | Votes: 4 | Favorites: 5 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
Items
-
Plane Landing Without Wheels In Runway
-
Dallas news helicopter crash landed near a grand prairie lake
-
Stunt Pilot Averts Plane Crash Tragedy.
-
Inside a Plane Crash Landing
-
Gordon Brown Praises Plane Crash Crew.
-
Out of Fuel, Pilot Opts to Pray Rather than Land (16 Dead)...
-
WWII Fighter Plane Crash-Lands
-
F-111 over Brisbane, Australia.
-
Gear Collapses as FAA Plane Lands
-
Two Spacecraft To Crash On The Moon
-
Pilots Simulate Crash Landing.
-
RAAF - Australian Airforce - F111 Tactical Strike Bombers
Advertisers




a great expression, 'stoked and wrapped' ...exemplary flying and courage - great work lads!
Posted Jun-6-2012 Bythecleaner001 (11784.38) 
thecleaner001 View Channel Send Message
(2)
Squeeky bum time.
Posted Jun-6-2012 ByBawbag (761.60) 
Bawbag View Channel Send Message
(1)
shame there all scrapped now :(.........well in AU..
Posted Jun-6-2012 Bygosst60 (273.00) 
gosst60 View Channel Send Message
(1)
@gosst60 yep and now replaced by the F/A-18F superhornets even though many wanted the F-22 but at the end of the day they were to expensive and were not ideal for ground support. The sad part is the F-35 is turning into a 3 legged dog so we may get F-22's anyway.
Posted Jun-6-2012 ByPenguinister (478.60) 
Penguinister View Channel Send Message
(2)
@Penguinister Yeah i know. look what happened to the Harriers too, sat in the Bone yard in bits. :(
Posted Jun-6-2012 Bygosst60 (273.00) 
gosst60 View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Penguinister Australia basically got majorly screwed over the F35., and had to buy Super Hornets because of lack of life in the Hornet airframes. They were expecting F35s in 2012 or 2014 LATEST, and I doubt any one will see them before 2020.
Total cock up. Not AUS fault though,. and the UK in a similar predicament, with a pair of state of the art carriers coming online with nothing to fly off them except Lynx and Merlin. Our perfectly good Harriers flogged of to the US for parts for their AV8s More..
Posted Jun-6-2012 Bygnark1ll (535.56) 
gnark1ll View Channel Send Message
(1)
@gnark1ll The us won't sell the f-22 to anyone .the uk s decision to sell there only carrier jets was truly amazing .in my opinion it should have been the last thing they cut .
Posted Jun-6-2012 Bymarkymark69 (547.14) markymark69 View Channel Send Message
(1)
@markymark69 Yup, and never to sell any now, to their beleaguered erstwhile allies.
Unless they reopen the production line, I believe they stopped at just under 200 copies right? No B model, no versions, no nuthin.
Shame.
Posted Jun-6-2012 Bygnark1ll (535.56) 
gnark1ll View Channel Send Message
(1)
Think I would have dumped or burned off at 2/3's of that fuel before belly landing.
Posted Jun-6-2012 Bystarmover (54.90) 
starmover View Channel Send Message
(1)
A little bit to over dramatized
Posted Jun-6-2012 Bytomtom711 (113.24) 
tomtom711 View Channel Send Message
(1)
THAT MUSTACHE!
Posted Jun-6-2012 ByTrainedWreck (75.48) 
TrainedWreck View Channel Send Message
(1)
@TrainedWreck Yup pure Air Force handle bar, WW1 style.
Posted Jun-6-2012 Bygnark1ll (535.56) 
gnark1ll View Channel Send Message
(0)
Pretty bonza!
But in the end no-wheel landings are not a real emergency for most aircraft types.
Posted Jun-6-2012 ByDEADBEEF (4149.96) 
DEADBEEF View Channel Send Message
(0)
@DEADBEEF Ignoring potential ground casualties of the crashing airplane, is it safer to eject or belly land for the pilots?
Posted Jun-6-2012 Bykingfordlm (692.36) 
kingfordlm Send Message
(0)
@kingfordlm
I'm not a pilot, but everything I've read or viewed says that belly-landing is a pretty safe option.
If the landing is at an attended airport then it's almost as smooth as a wheels up landing.
Ejecting from a military aircraft is quite hazardous and only done in case of catastrophic failure.
Posted Jun-6-2012 ByDEADBEEF (4149.96) 
DEADBEEF View Channel Send Message
(0)
@kingfordlm - the record of survival in F-111 crashes with ejections is mixed. It's a very complicated system in which the entire capsule containing the crew detaches, rockets up, then parachutes down and lands on airbags. It's amazing when it works (worked), but one thing going wrong meant death or serious injury.
Posted Jun-6-2012 Bygeekstud (333.72) 
geekstud View Channel Send Message
(0)
Good job boys.
Posted Jun-6-2012 ByAsterix (230.40) 
Asterix View Channel Send Message
(0)
Sexy plane, great landing!
Posted Jun-6-2012 Bydownhill2400 (1307.88) downhill2400 View Channel Send Message
(0)
Fucking pussy pilots, when the shit really hits the fan they fucking jump out. I got to ride the fuckers down.
Posted Jun-6-2012 ByLickMyDuck (540.20)

LickMyDuck View Channel Send Message
(0)
2000 mph? Nice
Posted Jun-6-2012 ByFumeholesniffer (2.10) 
Fumeholesniffer Send Message
(0)
Good vid! Great piloting.
Posted Jun-6-2012 Bypantucci (337.74) pantucci View Channel Send Message
(0)
Bet that was a sphincter moment...good job boys.
Posted Jun-6-2012 ByUKGEZR (309.70) 
UKGEZR View Channel Send Message
(0)