Safe Mode: On
Assisted-suicide ruling to be appealed by Ottawa (Stephen Harper)

I guess he would rather see her suffer so she can pay more taxes for his free limousine rides?

The federal government will appeal last month's ruling by the British Columbia Supreme Court that partially struck down Canada's ban on assisted suicide, Justice Minister Rob Nicholson says.

The ruling declared that the Criminal Code section targeting anyone who "aids or abets a person to commit suicide" should not apply to physicians in cases where terminally ill patients request to die.

Justice Minister Rob Nicholson said Friday the government believes laws prohibiting medical professionals or anyone else from counselling or assisting suicide are constitutionally valid. (Canadian Press)Judge Lynn Smith halted her decision for a year to give Parliament a chance to rewrite the law, which she deemed unconstitutional because it unfairly deprives people with degenerative illnesses of their liberty, and because it discriminates against those with a physical disability who might need assistance to exercise their right to take their own life.

But she also granted an immediate exemption for Gloria Taylor, one of the women who brought the suit, and her doctor.

Nicholson said Friday the government will seek a suspension of all aspects of the ruling, including the exemption for Taylor, while it goes to the British Columbia Court of Appeal. The government believes Section 241(b) of the Criminal Code is constitutional, he said.

"The laws surrounding euthanasia and assisted suicide exist to protect all Canadians, including those who are most vulnerable, such as people who are sick or elderly or people with disabilities," Nicholson said in a statement. "The Supreme Court of Canada acknowledged the state interest in protecting human life and upheld the constitutionality of the existing legislation in Rodriguez (1993)."

"In April 2010, a large majority of parliamentarians voted not to change these laws, which is an expression of democratic will on this topic. It is an emotional and divisive issue for many Canadians," the statement said.

Civil liberties lawyer disappointedA lawyer for the B.C. Civil Liberties Association, one of the plaintiffs in the case, said the organization is disappointed — though not surprised — by the federal government's appeal of Smith's ruling.

"Given the strength of the decision and just how carefully it was considered and how detailed it was, it is perplexing," Carmen Cheung said.

"As many people know, and as the court recognized, this case is a very urgent one for Ms. Taylor, who is very sick, and she is seeking a right to a peaceful and dignified death. It's her life and her decision how she wishes to die, and it's an interference really in her very, very personal decision."

Taylor has Lou Gehrig's disease, or ALS, an ailment that is likely to sap away her control over her body until she can't even breathe on her own, while leaving her mind and sensation intact. She hailed the lower court's ruling because it gives her control over when and how she dies.

Taylor and the other plaintiffs in the case argued that the ban on assisted suicide violates Section 15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms because it discriminates against people with degenerative conditions who don't have the physical means to take their own lives.

They also argued the ban violates their Section 7 right to life because, if they do want to end their suffering, they would have to do so earlier than they might otherwise want, before they lose the capacity to act.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/07/13/pol-cp-federal-appeal-assisted-suicide.html

 
Poll

Added: Jul-15-2012 Occurred On: Jul-15-2012
By: -Tipping_Point-
In:
Regional News, Politics
Tags: assisted-suicide, nanny-state, Stephen Harper, modern fascism
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 1574 | Comments: 28 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • If someone is living in constant pain, with no hope of recovery, and they don't want to live anymore, you have to be a giant douchebag to force them to continue suffering.

    If someone wants to end their life, that's their right to do so.

    Posted Jul-15-2012 By 

    (2)

    • @jum_runky Except suicide is not a right and pain can be eased if not stopped.

      Pain is a part of life and none of us have a hope of recovering from our own certain death.

      Those moments may not seem beneficial to the patient but those same moments can have a lasting impact on the people around them.

      Suicide is and will continue to be a deeply selfish act; where one satisfies their own desire to end the momentary pain of their life without regards for what effect it will have for those who are More..

      Posted Jul-15-2012 By 

      (-2)

    • @camy011

      Couldn't you argue that it's selfish of those "left behind" to want to keep the person around at the cost of increasing their suffering?

      Posted Jul-15-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @jum_runky You are correct, not killing someone is a selfish action and so is the desire for you not wanting a loved one to kill them-self. /sarcasm

      The one intervening with the natural flow of reality is the selfish one.

      Posted Jul-15-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @jum_runky Runky just letting you know camy011 is some sort of Scientologist. Don't bother watering a rock, because a rock won't grow or change it's direction.

      Posted Jul-15-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • @-Tipping_Point-

      This is true.

      Posted Jul-15-2012 By 

      (0)

  • How about defining it in terms of active and passive. Passive is unplugging someone from a machine. Active is injecting them with something that will kill them.

    We are all terminally ill patients, it is part of being human. If you support assisted suicide how are you not supporting suicide in general?

    Posted Jul-15-2012 By 

    (0)

    • @camy011 If somebody wants to kill themselves they technically have the right to. Yes, you read that correctly, people have the right to kill themselves. But there are some people in the world who don't have the physical capacity to carry out their own killing. This is where physician assisted-suicide comes in. Your opinions should not restrict the choice of others. If you don't believe in suicide, don't kill yourself. If you don't believe in assisted-suicide, don't have a doctor kill you. Shall More..

      Posted Jul-15-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • @-Tipping_Point- Your post made me smile due to the innately flawed presupposition you brought into the argument.

      Let me grant the position that morality is subjective to the individual to illustrate. Lets say my subjective moral view is that no one should <blank> (commit suicide).

      What you have just done in your statement is declared my subjective view on this issue as wrong (and yours right). This however is a contradiction within your own view, i.e. my view is as right as your own. Th More..

      Posted Jul-15-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @camy011 Are you a Scientologist? If not they could reaaally use someone like you. Anyways, aside from you sounding like a pompous tit, this is not a philosophical argument. This is an argument about peoples freedom of choice, obviously something you do not have much regard for. People should have the right to take their own life. It is not something that the government or tits like yourself should be able to argue about. Now if you've been able to understand anything you've just read, fuck off More..

      Posted Jul-15-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • @camy011 One more useless comment and you won't be able to comment no more.

      Posted Jul-15-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • @-Tipping_Point- I am sorry if I offended you as my intent was purely to try and bring out the truth by shedding light on contradiction.

      However, I did not see any rebuttal to my argument merely name calling. I do not take offense to this though as I am well aware of this tendency in human nature which resort to such actions when contradictions in ones mind are made conscious and they are forced to maintain their position in spite of logic.

      Posted Jul-15-2012 By 

      (0)

  • i watched my mother in law die of cancer and ms she was screaming with the pain near the end ,she asked my wife to please kill her to end her pain . the docters pumped her full of morphine and then she was at peace thank god

    Posted Jul-15-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Comment of user '1812' has been deleted by author!
  • I'm 100% with euthanasia.Just defining terms and conditions.

    Posted Jul-15-2012 By 

    (0)

  • control, control, control.


    and we're such a 'free' country.

    Posted Jul-16-2012 By 

    (0)

  • "Are you in support of physician assisted-suicide?"
    Depends. I am. Unless you're going to FORCE doctors to "prescribe" suicide pills.

    Posted Jul-16-2012 By 

    (0)