Safe Mode: On
NEW 9/11 VIDEO MISSILE STRIKE PENTAGON

NEW 9/11 VIDEO MISSILE STRIKE PENTAGON

Loading the player ...
Embed Code
Plays: 10567 (Embed: 0)

Added: Apr-29-2010 
By: TheSmigg
In:
News
Tags: 9 11, pentagon, twin towers, george bush
Marked as: approved
Views: 12428 | Comments: 97 | Votes: 3 | Favorites: 2 | Shared: 2 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Comment of user 'barrysucks' has been deleted by moderator!
  • Truthers are such fucking idiots its almost sad.

    Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

    (6)

    • almost? it is sad, its ridiculous, how these people are still here, planes didnt hit the wtc... a missile did, ffs there ridiculous, and the tarnish the memories of those that fell that day and those that continue to fall in wars around the world.

      Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

      (-5)

    • Then explain the lag of wing and engine impact to the pentagon. Explain how an entire passenger jet disappeared into that hole.

      Didn't think so.

      Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

      (0)

    • *Lack*

      Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

      (-2)

    • Aluminum at 500mph hits 2 foot thick limestone block with concrete backing - you were expecting a perfect cut-out a la Wiley Coyote?

      Please see link I provided above and you'll find your engine debris.

      Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

      (0)

  • if it were an inside job, wouldn't the government be able to afford a regular jumbo jet to fly in to the pentagon and save itself the trouble of having people analizing grainy CCTV footage of it's cruise missiles?

    Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

    (5)

    • More importantly why have they fought the release of the dozens of cameras that caught footage of the event. Like the government tells us when they wiretap and search illegally, you dont have anything to worry if you've done nothing wrong....consistency and fair standards in actions and policy would be refreshing.

      Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

      (5)

    • What "dozens" of cameras? There sure weren't any around that area of the Pentagon because it isn't a pedestrian entry way.

      Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

      (-1)

    • Well the ones they took from the petrol station for a start . I'd be a bit worried if the Pentagon had that level of security .

      Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

      (2)

    • Do we know it showed anything? My recollection is that the camera is focused on the pumps that face Arlington National Cemetary - not the Pentagon.

      Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

      (0)

    • well in less than a minute I founds these, do your own research before calling someone out on their facts.

      http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread225549/pg1

      Posted May-1-2010 By 

      (0)

  • All these conspiracies do is keep the real questions from being acknowledged through all the bullshit. 9/11 was allowed to happen. It could have been stopped, but it was not.

    Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

    (5)

    • this is the truth. there were tons of holes in National Security and a lot of people on those planes probably thought they would just be held hostage like in the PLO hijackings so they didn't fight back (except one plane). We just got used to living in the world where the continental U.S. was untouchable by foreign powers and it jumped up and bit us in the ass.

      Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

      (4)

  • LMAO at troofers.

    Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

    (4)

  • The Government wouldn't lie. Just ask the President.

    Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

    (4)

  • For the LL experts from a LL question.
    Where did the fuel go? The majority of the smoke signature isn't jet fuel? Jet fuel would have burn jet black for hours or the entire duration of the burn. This one when from black smoke to white smoke within seconds. Just saying, "there is a smoking gun". Go head and profile video of jetfuel burn practices then go and profile missle strikes. Pay attention to the complete plume signatures on building strikes. Do that then let's talk.

    Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

    (4)

    • You're mistaken. It burned thick black choking smoke for at least 20 minutes that I know of. Pics taken just before and after the collapse also show black smoke, and that was 45 minutes after impact.

      Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

      (-1)

    • BS

      All I'm asking is just look at the smoke.
      This video post here the one that started this debate has no black smoke. Go ahead LOOK.
      *********
      Check this out:
      Color of the smoke as it just happened see 2:15
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxV2X0vwSas
      ****
      Now compare this.
      What Jet fuel smoke looks like.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ts7O-hxJJ38

      On my free time as a child and teenager I spent hours watching firefighters put out diesel oil fires at Canadain Forces Bases so 16 year More..

      Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

      (1)

    • I'll call BS on you. I was there and I can guarantee you for the 20 minutes I stuck around it was a thick black smoke. In fact it was so thick you couldn't even see that any damage had been done. We didn't know if the building had been penetrated or if the plane had hit the helipad and simply thrown flaming debris against the building. Additionally, what color is a fire that gets hits by fire suppression - black, or grey and white?
      In the attached link - what color is that smoke? It's at least More..

      Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

      (0)

    • You where there like thousands of others. SGT Lagasse and SGT Brooks where there too, and if you can get me a black smoke clip I haven't seen yours yet. Here is my example I want you to show me. OK if it isn't BLACK take it back.

      http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/802520--rooftop-fire-at-queen-s-quay-building?bn=1

      Your picture is again is light not Black petro chemical like fuels burn "BLACK" ok.

      Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

      (1)

    • BTW - thanks for the reference to SGT LaGrasse and Brooks as they verify in their video statements that it was a plane - they could "see both engines"
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elKov_UZDQE

      Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

      (-1)

  • Hah, idiot truthers are entertaining at least. You have to wonder how many of them have a family history of paranoid psychzophrenia.

    Just a few more decades and the truth about the biggest secret ever kept will finally come out I'm sure. One of the thousands of accomplices will finally talk.

    Smart.

    Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

    (3)

    • How bad does it suck that THEY are on YOUR side of TRUTH and beliefs....that Truthers/Birthers...that in the end ....they are YOU and YOU are them...

      Remember....Onbama is "the company he keeps"...Conservatives....by that SAME METRIC....are "birthers/truthers"....how much does that suck for your "message"?

      Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

      (-6)

    • There's a subtle difference that I'm sure you're not capable understanding, the tiny fringe practically non-existent "Birthers" have substantive logic behind their delusions.

      Whereas the masses of "Truthers" have nothing but drugs and mental problems fueling their deranged nonsense.

      Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

      (-4)

    • Your posts are getting more and more bizarre over time. Feeling OK? Seriously.

      Here's the deal. An American Airlines aircraft crashed into the Pentagon. End of story.

      Birthers want to see a document, but apparently one does not exist that anyone can tell. And his transcripts somehow don't exist at either Harvard or Occidental College. And now we are finding out that he was probably not even a constitutional professor like earlier stated. Just asking for the documents, not floating anyth More..

      Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

      (5)

    • More bizzare than yours?? Really? You should reread the totality of your responses and post....you need to stop drinking or get off the rock before you post....or seek medical treatment for your paranoia...

      What did I say...that you and yours "birthers/truthers" are from the SAME CAMP....they are NOT libs/Dems...they are YOUR guys...and shitty stupid things they say....reflect on YOU/YOURS not the other side....

      Birthers have been characterized as "nut cases and crazy" by C More..

      Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

      (-7)

    • that's a pretty far stretch. i don't go a to birther's/truther's house to start my political career...attend a birther's/truther's church...appoint birthers/truthers to my administration...write two books about how influential birthers/truthers were for my thinking. keep reaching for the stars.

      Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

      (-1)

  • WHY WHY would the us use a cruise missle to attack the pentagon and then say it was a plane??? way to many loose ends there. fuck, if was a conspiracy why wouldnt they rig a plane to hit the pentagon and not have to worry about what people would have seen. you truthers are so fucking dumb its sad.

    Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

    (3)

  • That's a really wee hole for a big fuck-off plane to have made . And a fine job from a first time flyer .

    Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

    (2)

    • I believe the "wee hole" you're referring to is the exit hole in the C ring - not the entry hole.

      Please look at this for more info: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1

      Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

      (0)

  • Anyone comment of the cruise missile painted up with the American airlines decals at the end? Anyone know more about this?

    Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

    (2)

  • So when did high explosive blow up with a big red flame that actually looks like every other aircraft crashing vid? Could it really be aviation fuel? Really? Or is the truth, that it really was a terrorist attack, well, just too boring for you? I'm afraid that's just life, son.

    Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

    (2)

  • Okay, if it was a cruise missile that hit and not an airplane, than answer this:

    Where is the Airplane and it's passengers/crew?

    Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

    (2)

  • There were so many eyewitnesses who actually saw the plane that this truther nonsense just gets stranger. Hell, they even have pictures of several streetlight posts that were knocked down by the plane's wings as it flew low towards the Pentagon.
    "Barbara K. Olson, the former federal prosecutor who became a prominent TV commentator during the impeachment of President Bill Clinton, called her husband twice in the final minutes. Her last words to him were, "What do I tell the pilot to d More..

    Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

    (1)

  • My sister was inside that day, she said the whole building shook violently 9at least where she was at), she and the others in the room thought it was a bomb, like OKC maybe, all went under a large conference table, the lights flickered then went off next emergency lighting came on, the door to the conference room she was in was kicked in and she told me there were two marines telling everyone to leave by following them quickly, as the did, she said the most intense fuel smell was all over even i More..

    Posted Apr-29-2010 By 

    (1)