Safe Mode: On
Internet lines up behind The Declaration of Internet Freedom

A growing number of tech companies and names are demanding basic, unalienable, digital rights

It's no secret that various parts of the internet have been under attack for some time. Traditional media companies respond with terror at the thought of losing even more business to piracy (though it's questionable just how much they're actually hurting). Cable internet providers want the right to control what speeds you're allowed to access what sites at. And the U.S. government, meanwhile, wants to help these companies out by making streaming copyrighted content punishable by up to five years in prison.

Some major names on the internet have had enough of playing defense. That's why they're launching a new initiative called the Declaration of Internet Freedom. It's a short five-point document — a Bill of Rights of sorts — that lists out the basics of what humanity should expect and deserve from the internet. It reads:

"We stand for a free and open Internet. We support transparent and participatory processes for making Internet policy and the establishment of five basic principles:

Expression: Don't censor the Internet.
Access: Promote universal access to fast and affordable networks.
Openness: Keep the Internet an open network where everyone is free to connect, communicate, write, read, watch, speak, listen, learn, create and innovate.
Innovation: Protect the freedom to innovate and create without permission. Don't block new technologies, and don't punish innovators for their users' actions.
Privacy: Protect privacy and defend everyone's ability to control how their data and devices are used."

The Declaration of Internet Freedom is supported by a number of well-known, high-tech names, such as Mozilla (creators of Firefox), the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), left-wing political opinion site Daily Kos, and right-wing blogging heavyweight Patrick Ruffini. By backing the document, the organization hopes to promote understanding and build support for the cause. Private individuals are urged to take action through partner sites such as the non-profit Electronic Frontier Foundation.

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/technology-blog/internet-lines-behind-declaration-internet-freedom-221654205.html


Added: Jul-2-2012 Occurred On: Jul-2-2012
By: Tongueboy
In:
World News
Tags: Declaration, internet, freedom
Marked as: approved
Views: 1482 | Comments: 9 | Votes: 3 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • i support this as well

    Posted Jul-3-2012 By 

    (3)

  • Will it be able to protect content owners rights? I'm not for piracy and I certainly don't support the underhanded ways that companies such as Google Apple and Facebook deem it their property when you use their service simply because it's free. The very idea that they own your information because they allow you access to their sites all the while making billions from advertising is a scam. You and I are providing them with a base for their advertising revenues and as such it follows that without More..

    Posted Jul-3-2012 By 

    (3)

    • @The Cell Tribe

      Well. It is an interesting perspective, at lest. This bill does not view copying as piracy, it seems. And "Intellectual Property" is a strange concept in itself. Copyright was intended to go into the public domain after a not so long while, to promote creativity, not to lay claim to ideas for eternity. It is not property in the real sense of the word, nor ought it to be. You can't have an idea be passed down through the family and expect nobody else to use it without More..

      Posted Jul-3-2012 By 

      (1)

  • Comment of user 'MrScabs' has been deleted by author!
  • sign me up

    Posted Jul-3-2012 By 

    (2)

  • Sign on!
    http://www.internetdeclaration.org/freedom

    Posted Jul-3-2012 By 

    (2)

  • I'm sure the "protect privacy" clause will constantly conflict with mmmmm... pretty much all the other clauses. I would support this, but I think protecting privacy really needs to be up to the individual. Don't share it if you want it kept private.

    Posted Jul-3-2012 By 

    (0)