A growing number of tech companies and names are demanding basic, unalienable, digital rights
It's no secret that various parts of the internet have been under attack for some time. Traditional media companies respond with terror at the thought of losing even more business to piracy (though it's questionable just how much they're actually hurting). Cable internet providers want the right to control what speeds you're allowed to access what sites at. And the U.S. government, meanwhile, wants to help these companies out by making streaming copyrighted content punishable by up to five years in prison.
Some major names on the internet have had enough of playing defense. That's why they're launching a new initiative called the Declaration of Internet Freedom. It's a short five-point document — a Bill of Rights of sorts — that lists out the basics of what humanity should expect and deserve from the internet. It reads:
"We stand for a free and open Internet. We support transparent and participatory processes for making Internet policy and the establishment of five basic principles:
Expression: Don't censor the Internet.
Access: Promote universal access to fast and affordable networks.
Openness: Keep the Internet an open network where everyone is free to connect, communicate, write, read, watch, speak, listen, learn, create and innovate.
Innovation: Protect the freedom to innovate and create without permission. Don't block new technologies, and don't punish innovators for their users' actions.
Privacy: Protect privacy and defend everyone's ability to control how their data and devices are used."
The Declaration of Internet Freedom is supported by a number of well-known, high-tech names, such as Mozilla (creators of Firefox), the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), left-wing political opinion site Daily Kos, and right-wing blogging heavyweight Patrick Ruffini. By backing the document, the organization hopes to promote understanding and build support for the cause. Private individuals are urged to take action through partner sites such as the non-profit Electronic Frontier Foundation.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/technology-blog/internet-lines-behind-declaration-internet-freedom-221654205.html
By: Tongueboy
In: World News
Tags: Declaration, internet, freedom
Marked as: approved
Views: 1482 | Comments: 9 | Votes: 3 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
Wave goodbye to Internet freedom
-
The O’Reilly Factor: Billo Blames Internet For “Anything Goes” Permissiveness That Led To Spitzer Sc
-
End of the Internet Freedom in US
-
Be a hero and Help stop SOPA.
-
Our Internet Freedom In Jeopardy
-
Democrats Pass Net Neutrality
-
Internet Freedom In Danger
-
Obama Talks Internet Freedom, China Censors
-
Rush Limbaugh - Assault on internet freedom coming this Christmas!
-
Internet Freedom: Ron Paul
-
Outlook for 2012: Total Collapse of Society and The End of Internet Freedom
-
US seeks to restrict internet freedom in America



i support this as well
Posted Jul-3-2012 ByLostSomewhereInSpace (2534.40) 
LostSomewhereInSpace View Channel Send Message
(3)
Will it be able to protect content owners rights? I'm not for piracy and I certainly don't support the underhanded ways that companies such as Google Apple and Facebook deem it their property when you use their service simply because it's free. The very idea that they own your information because they allow you access to their sites all the while making billions from advertising is a scam. You and I are providing them with a base for their advertising revenues and as such it follows that without More..
Posted Jul-3-2012 ByThe Cell Tribe (17.10) 
The Cell Tribe Send Message
(3)
@The Cell Tribe
Well. It is an interesting perspective, at lest. This bill does not view copying as piracy, it seems. And "Intellectual Property" is a strange concept in itself. Copyright was intended to go into the public domain after a not so long while, to promote creativity, not to lay claim to ideas for eternity. It is not property in the real sense of the word, nor ought it to be. You can't have an idea be passed down through the family and expect nobody else to use it without More..
Posted Jul-3-2012 Bywellybub (353.58) 
wellybub View Channel Send Message
(1)
sign me up
Posted Jul-3-2012 ByTongueboy (3130.24) Tongueboy View Channel Send Message
(2)
Sign on!
http://www.internetdeclaration.org/freedom
Posted Jul-3-2012 Bycorgi_o_ner (146.42) 
corgi_o_ner View Channel Send Message
(2)
@corgi_o_ner Thanks for the link
Posted Jul-3-2012 ByTongueboy (3130.24) Tongueboy View Channel Send Message
(1)
@Tongueboy, Yer welcome.
Posted Jul-3-2012 Bycorgi_o_ner (146.42) 
corgi_o_ner View Channel Send Message
(1)
I'm sure the "protect privacy" clause will constantly conflict with mmmmm... pretty much all the other clauses. I would support this, but I think protecting privacy really needs to be up to the individual. Don't share it if you want it kept private.
Posted Jul-3-2012 ByIntellectual (771.64) Intellectual View Channel Send Message
(0)