Safe Mode: On
Democrat Kathy Hochul Wins Upset In NY-26, Medicare Vote Key To Victory

Democrat Kathy Hochul Wins Upset In NY-26, Medicare Vote Key To Victory
Benjy Sarlin | May 24, 2011, 10:14PM 206


Kathy Hochul
Read More
Jack Davis, Jane Corwin, Kathy Hochul, Medicare, NY-26
Share
Send to a friend!To email: Your Name: Your email:

Republicans are going to have plenty of questions about their plan to turn Medicare into a voucher program tomorrow morning after Democrats romped to an improbable victory in a special election focused almost entirely on the issue.

Democrat Kathy Hochul lead 48-43 with over 83% of the votes counted and her victory looks to be a strong one -- the Associated Press called the race within an hour of the polls closing. Corwin underperformed in key GOP counties while Hochul's margins in Democratic areas were in line with the party's high water mark in the district from 2006, a wave year that swept the Republicans out of the majority in the House and Senate. The district is normally a safe seat for Republicans and has never elected a Democrat.

Hochul's message focused relentlessly on the Paul Ryan budget, which she highlighted in ads, public statements, and debates at every opportunity. Her attacks on its cuts to Medicare benefits and its tax cuts for the wealthy proved impossible for Corwin to overcome, who tried her best to defend the GOP budget cuts before eventually giving in and falsely accusing Hochul of seeking similar cuts while muddying her own position on the plan.

National Democrats are giddy over the results, crowing that they'll use the same formula in swing districts across the country in 2012.

"Today, the Republican plan to end Medicare cost Republicans $3.4 million and a seat in Congress. And this is only the first seat.

"We served notice to the Republicans that we will fight them anywhere in America when it comes to defending and strengthening Medicare," DCCC chair Rep. Steve Israel (D-NY) said in a statement. "Even in one of the most Republican districts, seniors and independent voters rejected the Republican plan to end Medicare."

Republicans sought to spin the race beforehand as an exceptional situation due to the appearance of Tea Party independent Jack Davis, who was ironically the Democratic candidate in 2006. NRCC chair Pete Sessions (R-TX) repeated the claim on Tuesday night in a statement to reporters and added that past special elections had failed to prove predictive of the general election results.

"Republican Jane Corwin ran a hard-fought campaign against two well-funded Democrats, including one masquerading under the Tea Party name," Sessions said. Obviously, each side would rather win a special election than lose, but to predict the future based on the results of this unusual race is naive and risky. History shows one important fact: the results of competitive special elections from Hawaii to New York are poor indicators of broader trends or future general election outcomes. If special elections were an early warning system, they sure failed to alert the Democrats of the political tsunami that flooded their ranks in 2010."

But Hochul appears to have won solidly even while Davis' support collapsed from his earlier polling numbers in the mid-twenties. With over 66% of the vote in, he took only 8% of the vote while Hochul's numbers were strong compared to past Democratic performances. Corwin and Republican-allied groups significantly outspent Democrats in the race, making her victory that much tougher

 
Poll

Added: May-24-2011 Occurred On: May-24-2011
By: dcmfox
In:
Politics
Tags: ny, district, 26, dem, wins
Marked as: approved
Views: 6105 | Comments: 25 | Votes: 1 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Split voting, the conservative vote went in two directions and the Democrat swept up the dust to take the win.

    Posted May-25-2011 By 

    (2)

  • Add to that the news that the Tea Party is uniting against Romney, I predict a very lively and exiting GOP primary. In comparison, the presidential election will be predictably boring...lol



    .

    Posted May-25-2011 By 

    (1)

    • @God_Himself no, with that much stupidity on the left, it will be like comedy central

      Posted May-25-2011 By 

      (-3)

    • Comment of user 'dcmfox' has been deleted by author!
    • @star53

      I'll take your word for it but if the left is stupid and did manage to take a secure seat in NY, what does that say about the competition??



      .

      Posted May-25-2011 By 

      (1)

    • @star53
      godhimself does LOOOOVEEEE that welfare state.
      How much you want to bet we paid for their computer and cellphone through programs.

      Posted May-25-2011 By 

      (2)

    • @DOWNPLANE

      You know me long enough to know that I'm against the welfare state, I don't support farming subsidies, big oil subsidies, Wall St stimulus etc... I'm even against other type of welfare like the one they call 'foreign aid' for shit holes like Pakistan and Israel.
      US taxpayer cash should improve the lives of the US citizens first and foremost.
      Surely you agree with me, don't you?



      .

      Posted May-25-2011 By 

      (0)

  • Critical thinking here - you had a former DNC operative running as a "Tea Party"(????) candidate who ran three time previously W/O success (he got 9%) The Republican got 42%. The Dem got 48%. Lets see - add the democratic plant to the Republican total and you get 51% of the vote. Sham election.

    Posted May-25-2011 By 

    (1)

  • Yep, the Dems stole another one!!!

    Posted May-25-2011 By 

    (1)

  • From a democratic candidate in '06 to a tea party candidate in '11? And this author thinks it is a normal, or even a bellwether, election? Good luck with that analysis.

    Posted May-25-2011 By 

    (0)

    • Comment of user 'dcmfox' has been deleted by author!
    • @dcmfox
      And a democrat would not have won this year but for a "hidden" ringer. Two against one you might say. Its the lib/democrat way.

      Posted May-25-2011 By 

      (0)

  • Comment of user 'mikk1408' has been deleted by author!
  • So what are the Democrats proposing as an alternative to Ryan's initial offering? I hear a lot of screaming against this cut or that cut, but nobody has proposed anything from the Democrat side. I'd like to know how they plan to stop the bleeding.

    Posted May-25-2011 By 

    (0)

    • @migs1955

      shhhhh...lol!

      The voting public has been injected with anti truth syrum by the media. Until they realize the lie's being told the trend will continue.

      Hold on to your arse if or rather when hyper inflation occurs...

      Posted May-25-2011 By 

      (0)

    • @boomersooner
      Seriously, lots of screaming from one side but ZERO proposals on a budget or Medicare fix. I'm holdin' tight to my arse!!! LOL... sort of:(

      Posted May-25-2011 By 

      (1)

  • not even worthy of a comment

    Posted May-25-2011 By 

    (-1)

  • Of course this was a reaction to Ryan's handling of Medicare in his republican plan. The dems are having a field day with this one because seniors, a powerful voting force and also a base of the GOP core, want their Medicare unblemished. The Republican base has eroded, many of those candidates can't spend enough money to distance themselves politically from this cancerous issue, and what OTHER plan could they promote now? None, is the answer right now. Ryan might single handedly split the pa More..

    Posted May-25-2011 By 

    (-1)

  • What medicare?? There's nothing left of it anyway... It's been used up and never repaid.

    Posted May-25-2011 By 

    (-2)

    • Comment of user 'dcmfox' has been deleted by author!
    • @dcmfox during what 3,4,5 wars Obama has us in now, and putting us in 16 trillion in debt, china threatening to attack us, all this in less than 4 yrs. LMAO!!! try again Mr. independent, rolls eyes

      Posted May-25-2011 By 

      (-1)

    • Comment of user 'dcmfox' has been deleted by author!
    • @dcmfox ... during ALL the presidencies that have allowed it to be tapped.. period!

      Posted May-25-2011 By 

      (-2)

    • @mysterykeeper

      I know that, just like SS, now people, more so rich people need to pay for it, over time, not tomorrow. Every one has debt at some time, and cash surplus other time's.

      We need to get people working again and that would solve a lot.

      Posted May-25-2011 By 

      (-1)