Safe Mode: On
It's time to stop the Border Turmoil and accept the U.S.-Mexico merger

It's time to stop the Border Turmoil and accept the U.S.-Mexico merger

– Secret meetings being held between the corporate and political elites of the U.S., Mexico and Canada to push North America into a European Union-style merger?
President Obama's reluctance to control the border and enforce laws requiring deportation of foreigners who enter the country illegally is part of a master plan to all but eliminate borders between the U.S., Canada and Mexico?
Does the agenda of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America include a common currency that would scrap the dollar in favor of what some are calling the "amero"?
It may be the biggest story of the 21st century, but few press outlets are telling it. In fact, until very recently, few in the U.S. were aware of the plans and even fewer denouncing what appears to be the implementation of an effort some have characterized as "NAFTA on steroids."
But opposition is mounting.
Perhaps the most blistering criticism has come from Lou Dobbs of CNN – a frequent critic of immigration policies.
"A regional prosperity and security program?" he asked rhetorically in a recent cablecast. "This is absolute ignorance. And the fact that we are -- we reported this, we should point out, when it was signed. But, as we watch this thing progress, these working groups are continuing. They're intensifying. What in the world are these people thinking about? You know, I was asked the other day about whether or not I really thought the American people had the stomach to stand up and stop this nonsense, this direction from a group of elites, an absolute contravention of our law, of our Constitution, every national value. And I hope, I pray that I'm right when I said yes. But this is -- I mean, this is beyond belief."
No one seems quite certain what that agenda is because of the vagueness of the official declarations. But among the things the leaders of the three countries agreed to work toward were borders that would allow for easier and faster moving of goods and people between the countries.
Coming as the announcement did in the midst of a raging national debate in the U.S. over borders seen as far to open already, more than a few jaws dropped.
Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo. and the chairman of the House Immigration Reform Caucus as well as author of the new book, "In Mortal Danger," may be the only elected official to challenge openly the plans for the new superstate.
Tancredo wants to know the membership of the Security and Prosperity Partnership groups along with their various trilateral memoranda of understanding and other agreements reached with counterparts in Mexico and Canada.
Jim Gilchrist, co-founder of the Minutemen, welcomed Tancredo's efforts.
"It's time for the Obama administration to come clean," Gilchrist said. "If President Obama's agenda is to establish a new North American union government to supersede the sovereignty of the United States, then the president has an obligation to tell this to the American people directly. The American public has a right to know."
Geri Word, who heads the SPP office, told WND the work had not been disclosed because, "We did not want to get the contact people of the working groups distracted by calls from the public."
WND can find no specific congressional legislation authorizing the SPP working groups nor any congressional committees taking charge of oversight.
Many SPP working groups appear to be working toward achieving specific objectives as defined by a May 2005 Council on Foreign Relations task force report, which presented a blueprint for expanding the SPP agreement into a North American union that would merge the U.S., Canada and Mexico into a new governmental form.
Phyllis Schlafly, the woman best known for nearly single-handedly leading the opposition that killed the Equal Rights Amendment, sees a sinister and sweeping agenda behind the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.
She accuses the president and others behind the effort of wanting to obliterate U.S. borders in an effort to increase the Mexican population transfer and lower wages for the benefit of U.S. corporate interests.
"Bush meant what he said, at Waco, Texas, in March 2005, when he announced his plan to convert the United States into a 'Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America' by erasing our borders with Canada and Mexico," she said. "The guest-worker proposal would turn the United States into a boardinghouse for the world's poor, enable employers to import an unlimited number of 'willing workers' at foreign wage levels, and wipe out what's left of the U.S. middle class. Obama lives in a house well protected by a fence and security guards and he associates with rich people who live in gated communities. Yet he has refused to protect the property and children of ordinary Arizona citizens from trespassers and criminals."
At least one of the nation's daily newspapers has officially weighed in in opposition to the mysterious plans for closer cooperation in security, commerce and immigration between the three North American nations.
Recently, the Pittsburgh Tribune Review questioned the unchallenged momentum toward merger.
"Will Americans trade their dead presidents for Ameros?" the newspaper asked in an editorial last month.
The paper chided efforts at replacing the U.S. and Canadian dollars and Mexican peso with "the amero" – a knockoff of the euro – along with the building of "a looming NAFTA-like superstate. "Canadians, Mexicans and Americans who value the sovereignty of their respective countries should be concerned."
The Tribune Review editorial saw synergy between the plans of the national leaders and the ambitious agenda of the Council on Foreign Relations – seen by many as a kind of secretive, shadow government of the elite. The CFR issued a bold report in the spring of 2005, shortly after the joint announcements in Waco by Bush and his counterparts.
"The Council on Foreign Relations published a report in May -- "Building a North American Community" -- calling for, among other things, redefining the borders of the three nations, creating a super-regional governance board and the North American Paramilitary Group to ensure that Congress does not interfere with whatever the trilateral union feels like doing," said the paper. "Must the Bush administration happily sacrifice every shred of American sovereignty for the greater good of the New World Order?"
In fact, the CFR report is a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter."
Some see it as the blueprint for merger of the U.S., Canada and Mexico. It calls for "a common economic space ... for all people in the region, a space in which trade, capital and people flow freely."
The CFR's strategy calls specifically for "a more open border for the movement of goods and people." It calls for laying "the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America." It calls for efforts to "harmonize visa and asylum regulations." It calls for efforts to "harmonize entry screening."
In "Building a North American Community," the report states that Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin "committed their governments" to this goal March 23, 2005, at that meeting in Waco, Texas.
Alan Burkhart, who describes himself as a free-lance political writer, cross-country trucker "and proud citizen of one of the reddest of the Red States – Mississippi," is another critic seething over these plans that seem to have a life of their own – with little or no real public debate.
"As time passes, American corporations will find it unnecessary to move their facilities out of the country," writes Burkhart. "Our already stagnant wages will be just as low as those of Mexico. The cultures of three great nations will be diluted. Our currency will be replaced with the 'Amero.' And, we’ll be one giant step closer to the U.N.’s perverse dream of a one-world government."
The Amero is not a new concept. It was first proposed by the Fraser Institute, a Canadian think tank, in a monogram titled "The Case for the Amero" in 1999.
Last month, the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America made one of its most visible and public moves since it was first announced last year. In Washington, on June 15, U.S. Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez, Mexican Economy Minister Sergio Garcia de Alba and Canadian Minister of Industry Maxime Bernier joined North American business leaders to launch the North American Competitiveness Council. It was a major development that showed the March 2005 meeting was no fluke – and that the plans announced by the three national leaders then were continuing to take shape. The NACC was first announced by Bush, Harper and Fox.
Made up of 10 high-level business leaders from each country, the NACC will meet annually with senior North American government officials "to provide recommendations and help set priorities for promoting regional competitiveness in the global economy."
Officially, the council has the mandate to advise the governments on improving trade in key sectors such as automobiles, transportation, manufacturing and services. The three countries do more than $800 billion in trilateral trade.

The concerns about the direction such powerful men could lead Americans without their knowledge is only heightened when interlocking networks are discovered. For instance, one of the components envisioned for this future "North American Union" is a superhighway running from Mexico, through the U.S. and into Canada. It is being promoted by the North American SuperCorridor Coalition, or NASCO, a non-profit group "dedicated to developing the world’s first international, integrated and secure, multi-modal transportation system along the International Mid-Continent Trade and Transportation Corridor to improve both the trade competitiveness and quality of life in North America."


Click to view image: 'b411ae39d0b1-231.jpg'

Added: Apr-24-2009 
By: BOSS_DROVER
In:
News
Tags: obama, traitor, corrupt
Views: 11508 | Comments: 60 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • another reson I didnt vote for obama

    Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

    (8) | Report

  • I live in L.A. county, our schools suck! gangs are on the rise! complete neighborhoods look like portions of a 3rd world country. There's a taco shop on every corner!! I mean, I like Mexican food, but do we need 50 on one street? I live here, the good ones that are still illegal stand in front of Home Depot looking for work! The bad ones are the shaved head, tattoo wearing, pants around the ass guys....most have 2 or 3 kids from multiple ladies.... our healthcare system, our jail system is about More..

    Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

    (6) | Report

    • i am not against Mexicans, but

      most mexicans are looking for quick way of making money which they would end up in drug business or illegal gangs that dissolve the community values to dust and fuck up the whole country and the system

      Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

      (0) | Report

    • True; but it is the history of our country with immigrants. Italians, Irish, Jews, Germans, Japs, Chinese, Mexicans..etc...
      Gangs, drugs, hardworking..etc...

      Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

      (0) | Report

    • i dotn mind that mate, nobody in north America is pure, what i mind is that the slums of Mexican gangs pouring in US and fuck up the country, since they are looking for a fastest way of making money that is drug dealing and gang

      Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

      (0) | Report

    • agree with you. It is just funny to hear the same "Grief%u2019s" my grandparents were saying of others during the early to mid 1900's. Especially when times are tough; tolerance of others stupidities and unsavory actions tends to be lowered... Thanks for your response.

      Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

      (0) | Report

    • thanks , its good to have discussions here and resolve misunderstandings and recognize the common grounds

      Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

      (0) | Report

  • How about putting up an electrified wall with a shoot-to-kill range of 100yds? Intrusos seran disparados. That'll get the libs panties in a twist, but should be pretty effective.

    Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

    (4) | Report

  • No thanks

    Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

    (4) | Report

  • I bought a bird feeder. I hung
    it on my back porch and filled
    it with seed. What a beauty of
    a bird feeder it is, as I filled it
    lovingly with seed. Within a
    week we had hundreds of birds
    taking advantage of the
    continuous flow of free and
    easily accessible food.

    But then the birds started
    building nests in the boards
    of the patio, above the table,
    and next to the barbecue.

    Then came the poop. It was
    everywhere: on the patio tile,
    the chairs, the table ...
    everywhere!

    Then some of the birds
    t More..

    Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

    (4) | Report

    • does that apply to the pilgrims and the other withe trash that came to this country in the past century when they were given amnesty and allowed to immigrate with just minimal documentation...
      patetic...

      Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

      (-1) | Report

    • 'course not, they presented their visas at the Mohican point of entry, and paid millions of dollars to the Dakotas for their land...

      Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

      (-1) | Report

  • Thanks for an interesting read. Don't know what this has to do with any real plans, a lot of it seems to be from Bushco. Had never heard of Alan Burkhart, seems like an interesting character. I don't think this N. American union shit will fly, not by a long shot.

    Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

    (3) | Report

    • Yeah, I don't know how much of this to believe. Sounds like more neo con dribble still angry over the election. The neo cons had their chance to do something about the borders and never did. Obama has been in office how long now????? How many vacations had bush taken at this point in 2001?

      Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

      (-2) | Report

  • NWO

    Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

    (1) | Report

  • I think it was pretty telling that when the US soccer team played the Mexicans in SAN DIEGO, the US team was booed while the Mexican team was cheered. Look out America the political elites are selling us out for to the corporate elites. The middle class will have everything they have stolen from them and given to others in order to create a permanent underclass dependant on government for their livelihood. There will only be the uber-rich and the poor, with nobody in between.

    Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

    (1) | Report

    • Comment of user 'allahisacoward' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • Laughable stuff and a complete non-issue. Citizens of the US need to unify more in thought and purpose. We need to focus on restoring quality of life to it's citizens and confidence in the American markets.

    One of the most necessary steps to unifying goals and interests is to remove unnecessary political noise in this country.

    One way to do that is to remove from our system illegals that have no vested interest in the well-being of our country. Along with the illegals, we need to elimin More..

    Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

    (1) | Report

  • Another reason to expel all illegals is that as Americans fill jobs now taken by illegals, unemployment will go down. The effects the real wage. That is to say the real wage will go up.

    Also, as American workers are more skilled, the money wage goes up as well. Prices will rise on products, but that is good because the worker is paid more, and the supplier is able to recieve a greater price for product.

    This means that there is greater demand for the USD. As the demand for the USD goes More..

    Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

    (1) | Report

  • nice pic, I'd like to see those shiny gangster domes piked along my fence..let my dog gnaw the faces off 'em.

    Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

    (1) | Report

  • For average people to have a better quality of life, we need to make countries smaller and economies more local; not the other way around. Globalization is only good for the more affluent classes. Globalization literally means the free movement of capital, goods, and labor. The free movement of capital is pretty much what caused the collapse of the global banking and credit system. The free movement of labor is what has depressed wages in the west and created an itinerant class of low-skille More..

    Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

    (1) | Report

    • you make a lot of good points here. Hope somebody's listening. Write your congressman, e-mail, or phone. Free trade is a fantasy, fair trade is possible. Thanks for the post, drover. Thanks for the comment, AvgDude2.

      Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

      (0) | Report

    • That what the "No Borders" idiots what, "Globalization". It should not be smaller countries, but keep the country you have already and stay where you are period. If your country sucks, don't leave and sneak in another country and ask for handouts, fix the problem there and make it better.

      Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

      (0) | Report

  • Globalization was attempted and the experiment is a bust.
    Back to a more local approach - its better anyway

    Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

    (0) | Report

  • Not one post saying it is a conspiracy theory. Hmmmm 6-7 months ago when people brought up the NAU we would be bashed and labled nuts,what happened between then and now that it is plausible.

    And for those who think we wont let it happen you are wrong. You will be amazed at what people will be willing to give up if their money is useless. I expect people on the MSM to start talking about the Amero soon,shit there is already talks about a global currency

    Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

    (0) | Report

  • Can see it now, Americans will be border jumping into Canada!

    Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

    (0) | Report

  • Look at the photograph...all those Mexicans have got broken or missing fingers. Poor guys

    Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

    (0) | Report

  • HAH, No.

    Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

    (0) | Report

  • Never!

    Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

    (0) | Report

  • No way. USA and Canada maybe but not Mexico. Too much economic and cultural difference

    Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

    (0) | Report

  • over my dead body

    Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

    (0) | Report

  • A lame North American Union is unworkable because it leaves the corrupt Mexican government in business. Google "Megamerge Dissolution Solution" for the real answer.

    Posted May-31-2009 By 

    (0) | Report

  • god damn you all are full of shit

    Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

    (0) | Report

  • Mexico is the biggest disappointment since the crucifixion..why the hell would big business want to merge with them?? Because they can make a killer tomato or because they can make a killer bowl of crystal meth? This has to be one of the dumbest articles Ive read, and Ive read some pretty stupid 9-11 conspiracy articles.

    Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

    (0) | Report

    • Ummm, could it be that they have VERY LARGE oil reserves and very cheap labor?

      Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

      (0) | Report

    • You mean we dont? Isnt cheap labor already outsourced to india and china? We dont have oil like Mexico has? You mean all this bullshit everyone tells us that we have oil in Alaska, off our coasts, in just about every single state, is just that...bullshit? If thats the case, then why dont we start another Iraq war in Mexico?! I mean surely the gringos arent as prepared for war as the moojies.

      Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

      (0) | Report

  • If this meeting is secret, why is the exact text of this item all over the internet?

    Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

    (0) | Report

  • almost all Mexicans are decent people who just want to work to support their families. i say let ALL of them in us.

    Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

    (-2) | Report

    • Fuck you and your Av. If they migrate LEGALLY then yeah of course they can stay. How bout you take the illegals if your such a bleeding heart there eh?

      Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

      (1) | Report

    • Comment of user 'ReplicantDeckard' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • Yeah, well they can work and support their families in Mexico. And if they don't like their wages, they can work to reform their own damn government, rather than trying to subvert ours.

      Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

      (2) | Report

    • Comment of user 'allahisacoward' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • fuck you and your reply(if you don't like my avatar you can kiss my ass). legally or not people deserve the right to have a better standard of living be it in us or canada

      Posted Apr-24-2009 By 

      (-3) | Report