Officials say former Navy Seal Matt Bissonnette is in violation of two non-disclosure agreements that he signed in 2007
Share4[/*]
[/*]
[/*]
Email[/*][/list]
The Pentagon is considering legal action against a former US Navy Seal whose book describes insider details of the raid that killed Osama bin Laden.
Officials said on Friday that the US military had not made a final judgment on whether the book reveals any secrets, but Pentagon press secretary George Little said the author, Matt Bissonnette, was deemed to be in violation of two nondisclosure agreements that he signed in 2007 by failing to submit the book for an official security review.
Bissonnette's lawyer disputed this, saying he believes the decorated former Seal has "earned the right to tell his story."
In his book, Bissonnette wrote that the Seals spotted Bin Laden at the top of a darkened hallway at his home in Pakistan and shot him in the head, even though they could not tell whether he was armed. Administration officials have described the Seals as shooting him Bin Laden only after he ducked into a bedroom because they assumed he might be reaching for a weapon.
Little would not say what legal options the Pentagon is considering or when it might take action.
"I write to formally advise you of your material breach and violation of your agreements, and to inform you that the department is considering pursuing against you, and all those acting in concert with you, all remedies legally available to us in light of this situation," Jeh Johnson, the Pentagon's top lawyer, wrote in a letter faxed to the author Thursday through his publisher.
In response, Robert D Luskin of the law firm Patton Boggs wrote to Johnson on Friday to say that his firm is representing Bissonnette and asserting that his client is not in breach of his nondisclosure agreements.
Luskin, who represented White House aide Karl Rove in the leak of CIA agent Valerie Plame's identity in the Bush administration, said the author had "sought legal advice about his responsibilities before agreeing to publish his book, and scrupulously reviewed the work to ensure that it did not disclose any material that would breach his agreements or put his former comrades at risk. He remains confident that he has faithfully fulfilled his duty."
Little suggested that if Bissonnette were to stop the book's official release, scheduled for next week, that might be a remedy. Some advance copies have been circulating, and the Pentagon obtained one last week. It has since been reviewing it for any classified information and to determine what, if any, legal action should be taken, Little said.
"The onus is on the author," Little said, while declining to spell out what the author must do.
But the publisher was firm on Friday. "At this time, we see no reason to change our plans," said Dutton spokesperson Christine Ball.
It was highly unlikely that the government would try to halt publication of the book itself, considering the book is already in the public domain and media reports have summarized its contents.
The justice department could go after the profits of the book in a civil proceeding. Department spokesman Dean Boyd declined any comment on the book Friday.
Retired CIA agent Frank Snepp published a book about his CIA activities in South Vietnam without submitting it to the agency for prepublication review.
The government sued to collect all profits, and the court ruled in the government's favor. The government did not contend that Snepp's book contained any classified material.
In its 6-3 ruling in 1980, the supreme curt said: "Undisputed evidence in this case shows that a CIA agent's violation of his obligation to submit writings about the agency for prepublication review impairs the CIA's ability to perform its statutory duties."
If the Pentagon determines that the Bin Laden book does disclose secrets, that would open the possibility of bringing federal criminal charges against Bissonnette. The potential charges and penalties would depend largely on what type of secrets were disclosed.
Little declined to describe the Pentagon's assessment of the contents of the book, but he later said it had not reached "any final conclusions" about whether secrets were revealed.
The Pentagon's position was presented by Johnson in a letter transmitted to the author through his New York publisher, Penguin's Dutton imprint.
Johnson said Bissonnette's nondisclosure agreements obliged him to "never divulge" classified information.
"This commitment remains in force even after you left the active duty Navy," Johnson wrote. He said the author left active duty "on or about April 20, 2012," which was nearly one year after the May 2011 raid.
By: BekasKhan
In: World News
Tags: US, Occupation, of, Afghanistan, Bin, Laden, raid, CIA, Pakistan, terrorist, Punjabi, ISI, Al, Qaeda,
Location: Afghanistan (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 4273 | Comments: 31 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
Scared Marine Explains Why It’s Time to Leave Afghanistan, The Graveyard of Empires
-
Taliban Deny Poison Attacks on Girls' Schools, Northern Alliance & Pakistan's Punjabi ISI Have History of Such Attacks
-
Nato announces deals to exit Afghanistan via Central Asia completely ignoring Pakistan Terrorist Punjabi ISI
-
Shootings by Afghan forces take growing toll on NATO troops
-
Obama Has Welcomed Afghan Move; " Y Does Mu-Barack Own Afghanistan ?II
-
Pakistan 'arrests CIA informants in Bin Laden raid'
-
Spies used this model for bin Laden raid in Pakistan
-
BBC: Osama bin Laden was CIA agent & Al-Qaeda Never Existed - Invented by CIA
-
Top US General in Afghanistan for Talks Hours After Another Insider US 'Insider Death' in Kandahar
-
Navy Seal account of Bin Laden raid contradicts White House claims
-
Talib-phobic Cameron warned that Afghanistan pullout could allow al-Qaeda to return
-
3 US soldiers shot dead and killed by ANA soldier in Helmand Afghanistan




"Matt Bissonnette, was deemed to be in violation of two nondisclosure agreements that he signed in 2007 by failing to submit the book for an official security review"
That violation there is enough to sink him regardless of the amount of classified information he divulged.
Posted Aug-31-2012 ByZardoz003 (1575.32) 
Zardoz003 View Channel Send Message
(2)
@Zardoz003 Our current President will not divulge in any personal information about himself.Yet we know so much about Mitt Romney being a Mormon.
Posted Aug-31-2012 Byopacity (120.68) 
opacity View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@opacity You serious? The reality is actually the fucking opposite of what you say Mr. fucktarded. I'd bet you don't believe in science and think Jesus rode a Dinosaur too.
Posted Sep-2-2012 ByZardoz003 (1575.32) 
Zardoz003 View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Zardoz003 I can tell you that my Countrymen sent a Spacecraft to mars.sent photographs back to the World community,with out Socialism.Pre Socialism.
Posted Sep-4-2012 Byopacity (120.68) 
opacity View Channel Send Message
(0)
what jerk off to write the title on this piece
navy seals sign paper saying they cannot dissguss what they do without permission .put him with bradley manning
Posted Aug-31-2012 Bymarkymark69 (552.64) markymark69 View Channel Send Message
(1)
Reading between the lines: "If Obama is re-elected, we'll bring all the power of the U.S. government down on your ass."
But they won't act before the election....
Posted Aug-31-2012 ByAlly_Gator (504.00) 
Ally_Gator View Channel Send Message
(1)
Hey Bekashan what part of "non disclosure agreement' do you not understand,,, c'mon now its only 3 words
Posted Aug-31-2012 Byhbon56 (132.70) hbon56 View Channel Send Message
(1)
I am living proof of what they will do if/when they dot like you
theLAB
Posted Aug-31-2012 BytheLAB (338.60) 
theLAB View Channel Send Message
(1)
The government is just pissed because they got caught lying again.
Posted Aug-31-2012 Bybaltar_ (172.32) 
baltar_ View Channel Send Message
(1)
As a Navy Seal he should have the discipline not to disclose information that he signed a contract with the US Military not to disclose.
Posted Aug-31-2012 Byleadfoot88 (258.22) leadfoot88 View Channel Send Message
(1)
You join the Seals you do not do so for glory or recognition. Its secrecy is what helps them do their job.
Oh and to the idiot who titled this little BS the US is a Republic.
Posted Sep-1-2012 BySkinnydaddy (648.88) Skinnydaddy View Channel Send Message
(1)
@Skinnydaddy You would have made a damn good Navy Seal if you ever got off of your ass.
Posted Sep-1-2012 Byopacity (120.68) 
opacity View Channel Send Message
(0)
@opacity Except for the small fact that thanks to a car wreak in High-school if I run for more than 25 yards my knee explodes and I end up having to learning to walk again for the 3rd time after surgery.
Posted Sep-1-2012 BySkinnydaddy (648.88) Skinnydaddy View Channel Send Message
(1)
Capitalism trumps patriotism.
Posted Sep-1-2012 Byplokiju (903.10) 
plokiju View Channel Send Message
(1)
And so the arguments begin.
Posted Aug-31-2012 Bypara001 (683.00) 
para001 View Channel Send Message
(0)
We are a republic. not a democracy.
Posted Sep-1-2012 Byvoteme (14.60) 
voteme View Channel Send Message
(0)
if is not true why the pentagon is so angry?
Posted Sep-1-2012 ByS0D (29.60) 
S0D Send Message
(0)
Who does this guy think he is? Its the Whitehouses job to leak classified information.
Posted Aug-31-2012 Bydaveporter (323.30) 
daveporter View Channel Send Message
(0)
he made an oath and failed so I'm concerned is a traitor and was sold for money, this would be able to sell anything to the enemy for money.
Now you will have to take refuge in the embassy of Ecuador and Ecuador now see as if it is an absolute democracy lol
Posted Sep-1-2012 Byperiquetin (30.10) 
periquetin View Channel Send Message
(0)
The thing that burns my ass is that with movie magic, they could have had him "defect to the USA" then have "him" proclaim on national tv interview that the beer is cold and Jack in the Box burgers are a sign from allah.But Noooo they went with the plan to drop him in the sea? WTF
Posted Sep-1-2012 Byspeakamerican (296.00) 
speakamerican View Channel Send Message
(0)