Safe Mode: On
Ron Paul and the racist newsletters (Fact Checker biography)

EDITOR’S NOTE: This column will be the first in a series of four
columns this week examining how factual Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.) has been
in describing his career in politics. Reporter Josh Hicks has spent
weeks examining Paul’s statements and deciding which ones best represent
how Paul talks about his past. Hicks has previously examined
biographical statements by Mitt Romney, Rick Perry and Newt Gingrich.

— Glenn Kessler

“I’m not a racist. As a matter of fact, Rosa Parks is one of my
heroes, Martin Luther King is a hero — because they practiced the
libertarian principle of civil disobedience, nonviolence.”

Ron Paul, responding during a Jan. 10, 2008, CNN interview to
questions about racially charged articles published in the “Ron Paul
Political Report” during the 1990s.

“I never read that stuff. I was probably aware of it 10 years after
it was written, and it’s been going on 20 years that people have
pestered me about this.”

— Ron Paul, responding to more questions about the newsletters during an interview with CNN, Dec. 21, 2011
Accusations of racism against Paul first surfaced during
the candidate’s 1996 congressional campaign, when Democratic opponent
Lefty Morris unveiled racially tinged quotes from a newsletter the Texas
libertarian had published during his 12-year hiatus from public office.
The national media latched onto the issue during Paul’s 2008 presidential bid, after the New York Times and the New Republic highlighted derogatory statements about blacks and gays from the bulletins.

issue resurfaced as Paul moved to the front of the GOP pack in recent
weeks, and the congressman appeared to be fed up with the matter as he
walked away from an interview in which a CNN reporter pressed for more
answers. (See the video below). We won’t be the judge of whether
Paul is a bigot, but we can examine the extent to which he had control
over his publications. Are we to believe he never reviewed the
newsletters that bore his name? Would he have eliminated the messages if
he’d seen them?
Paul helped form the Ron Paul & Associates
corporation in 1984, and the now-defunct company, for which he served as
president, began publishing newsletters the following year. The monthly
publications included Ron Paul’s Freedom Report, the Ron Paul Survival
Report, the Ron Paul Political Report and the Ron Paul Investment
Letter. column for New York magazine that statements of racist paranoia appeared regularly in Paul’s newsletters, representing a “consistent ideological theme.”

Many of the derogatory comments came from a 1992 commentary in the Political Report
titled “A Special Issue on Racial Terrorism.” The article blames
African American men for the L.A. riots, saying, “The criminals who
terrorized our cities — in riots and on every non-riot day — are not
exclusively young black males, but they largely are.” Another
passage from the article tries to explain how the tumult finally ended,
saying, “Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the
blacks to pick up their welfare checks three days after rioting began.”
The writer gives no credit to police, state troopers or soldiers from
the National Guard and Army and the Marines who helped end the chaos. That
wasn’t an isolated incident with Paul’s newsletters. A separate article
from the Survival Report said, “If you have ever been robbed by a black
teenaged male, you know how unbelievably fleet-footed they can be.” The
Paul publications also criticized homosexuals, saying gays “enjoy the
attention and pity that comes with being sick,” referring to AIDS. The
articles contain no bylines and no signatures, just Ron Paul’s name in
giant letters on the publications’ mastheads. This leaves a tiny bit of
wiggle room for the Texas congressman to defend himself. That’s what
he’s done, telling the media he has “no idea” how the inflammatory
comments made it into print.“I honestly do not know who wrote those things,” he told CNN in January 2008.

has compared himself to a major publisher who had little time to review
every article that went to press, even though his newsletters came out
monthly — and were thin at that. He claims he was too busy practicing
medicine and giving speeches across the country to pay attention to the
bulletins. “It’s been rehashed for a long time, and it’s coming up now for political reasons,” Paul told CNN
in January 2008. “Everybody in my district knows I didn’t write them,
and I don’t speak like that. Nobody has ever heard me say anything like
that.”Certain passages in the newsletters suggest that Paul, or
at least someone using his persona, wrote for the publications. One
article from October 1992 refers to the congressman’s hometown, saying,
“even in my little town of Lake Jackson, Texas, I’ve urged everyone in
my family to know how to use a gun in self defense, for the animals are
coming.” In an article
earlier that year, the author — writing in the first person — announced
his decision to chair the economic advisory committee for Pat
Buchanan’s presidential bid, a post Paul took up at the time. The libertarian magazine Reason cited
an anonymous source close to the 2008 Paul campaign attributing much of
the content from Political Report to Lew Rockwell, founder and chairman
of the Ludwig von Mises Institute, a libertarian economics center. Rockwell, whose name appears on the newsletters under the title of contributing editor, told the New Republic
that he did not write the controversial articles. He said that there
were “seven or eight freelancers involved at various stages” during his
tenure with the publishing outfit. As for Paul’s comments about
Rosa Parks, the candidate didn’t show much love for his “hero” when he
voted against a measure to award a Congressional Gold Medal to the civil
rights icon in 1999. To be fair, he opposed giving the medal to Mother
Teresa and Pope John Paul II as well, so it doesn’t appear race had
anything to do with his stance.Paul has generally applauded
lawmakers for wanting to issue the Gold Medal, but he insists they
should put up their own money instead of asking taxpayers to foot the
bill, which typically runs about $30,000 for each award. As
for King, a 1992 Ron Paul newsletter referred to the civil rights
leader as a “world-class philanderer who beat up his paramours.”
Paul offers implausible explanations for why so many
derogatory statements made it into his publications, insisting he knew
nothing about them. It’s hard to believe that a man who wants to oversee
the entire U.S. government — albeit a smaller version — would provide
zero oversight of his publications, or even bother to read them from
time to time. The Texas congressman has to take responsibility
for the newsletters that bear his name, or at least acknowledge
negligence as the former head of the company that produced them. He
earns three Pinocchios for failing to do so.

Added: Feb-17-2012 
By: LarryThompson
Tags: THE PINOCCHIO TEST, Ron Paul, racist newsletters, Ron Paul hearts Stormfront
Views: 2332 | Comments: 10 | Votes: 2 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.