According to media reports, the German government has dropped some of the conditions of engagement under which its soldiers in Afghanistan had been bound.
Bundeswehr troops will in future be able to engage in combat much earlier than has been the case.
German News Magazine, Der Spiegel, reported the change in its online edition on Saturday.
The key to the new terms of engagement, Der Spiegel said, is the deletion of one sentence, which said that "the use of deadly force is forbidden as long as an attack has not taken place, or is not immediately imminent."
Now the wording has been changed from “immediately imminent” to "recognizable".
A further phrase, referring to appropriate use of force, was also removed from the Bundeswehr's duty statement, opening the doors for German troops to take a more offensive stance in Afghanistan.
Legal protection to use adequate force
Defense Minister Franz Josef Jung said the new wording would give soldiers the necessary legal rights to deal with combat situations.
There had been recent allegations that soldiers did not have the legal authority to bring adequate firepower to their defense when under attack.
A speaker for the German Defense Ministry responded to the report in the magazine by saying that the rules of engagement are continually under review.
The security situation in the north of the country has been deteriorating, with Taliban attacks on Bundeswehr soldiers on the rise.
In Germany, the coalition government is arguing over whether the mission, which is widely unpopular with the German public, actually means that German troops are fighting a war in the Hindu Kush.
Although Social Democrat Party chief Peter Struck, and much of the German public see it as such, the Defense Minister Franz Josef Jung seems to have a different opinion.
Meanwhile, the Christian Social Union Bavarian parliamentary group head, Peter Ramsauer, has reinforced demands for an exit-strategy for the Afghanistan deployment.
Last Thursday, the German mission to Afghanistan was expanded to include an extra 300 AWACS surveillance aircraft personnel. The German parliament voted on the deployment, with more than 80 percent in favor.
That still does not bring German troop numbers up to the maximum 4,500 permitted under the government mandate.
In total, 35 German soldiers have died in Afghanistan as part of the NATO-led ISAF mission since 2002.
Click to view image: 'Bundeswehr'
By: bravo61
In: Afghanistan, Middle East
Tags: Afghanistan, Germany, Bundeswehr, ISAF, ROE
Marked as: approved
Views: 12740 | Comments: 23 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
Working Together
-
ISAF Airport Kunduz (Afghanistan).
-
German soldier dies from Afghanistan injuries
-
The first 3 (German) Eagle IV have arrived in Afghanistan.
-
Russia allows overland Germany army shipments to Afghanistan
-
DIE BUNDESWEHR IN AFGHANISTAN
-
German National Believed Kidnapped in Afghanistan
-
German Parliament Extends Afghanistan Mission
-
incidents at German checkpoints in Afghanistan
-
Bomb kills two American soldiers in Afghanistan
-
Germany's top soldier quits over Afghanistan raid





I dont know about anybody else, but I would truly LOVE to see the germans unleashed...they are badassed! let 'em loose and watch the carnage!
Posted Jul-5-2009 ByOzzyGodsmack (299.06) OzzyGodsmack Send Message
(9)
about time these rules of engagement were done away with,they've cost coalition troops lives i'm certain..the british forces aren't allowed to engage the enemy if they're in a mosque,yet it's ok for the enemy to fire rpgs and whatever at the troops from that mosque,it's beyond a joke.
Posted Jul-5-2009 Bydavementall (251.68) davementall View Channel Send Message
(8)
They've cost innocent natives lives as well. Germany has been so ridiculously passive, they would yield positions, and just leave, saying they can't protect a girl's school for instance.
If you're forced to wait until after the school has been flattened by a suicide bomber, then there's no point in being there at all. So, they say "sorry, we can't protect you" and just leave.
Germany is overcompensating for their WW2 guilt. It's why they have speech-laws on the holocaust. Overcompens More..
Posted Jul-6-2009 ByST0N3PONY (5065.72) 
ST0N3PONY View Channel Send Message
(-4)
Whole europe has become pussies.
Atleast our politicians
Posted Jul-6-2009 ByNoisekick (42.60) Noisekick View Channel Send Message
(6)
its worse than that they can not engage the enemy if the enemy have laid down their weapons.
Ive heard storys were soldiers have been engaged by the enemy,and when they stop just walk out from were they had been firing from on our lads,but without carrying their weapons and just get picked up in cars and go home and our lads know it was them but can not engage them as they are not armed.
and the enemy know this.
Posted Jul-6-2009 Byomegaone (147.96) omegaone Send Message
(1)
fully agree. what we do, we do 100% ;-)
Posted Jul-6-2009 ByRedNovember (26.24) 
RedNovember View Channel Send Message
(1)
It's a shame that Germany is so shackled even after the progress in rules of engagement. I think with the post Bush era our allies need to step up to the plate. This is progress, but by far not enough.
Posted Jul-5-2009 Byoneof6billion (65.90) oneof6billion View Channel Send Message
(2)
ROE is a joke when dealing with terrorists. taliban and algaeda dont care about the geneva convention. it all comes down to the type of person you are in the battle field...some more trigger happy, but most soldiers yearns for a fair fight.
Posted Jul-5-2009 Byngatik (51.20) ngatik View Channel Send Message
(2)
Actualy, they care a lot of the GC. It is the way how they keep breathing.
Posted Jul-6-2009 BySjumppanen (236.34) Sjumppanen View Channel Send Message
(1)
And now allow our boys to use battle tanks, howitzer, normal artillery and last but not least heavy air support with the tiger.
Posted Jul-7-2009 Byfocusdriver (13.08) focusdriver View Channel Send Message
(1)
I miss the old Germany...
Posted Jul-6-2009 Bylife is for real (225.04) life is for real View Channel Send Message
(0)
What are you fucking crazy?
Posted Jul-6-2009 BySuns_Funs (199.80) Suns_Funs View Channel Send Message
(4)
How can you miss something you didnt experienced
Posted Jul-28-2009 Bypvt_joker (10.70) 
pvt_joker View Channel Send Message
(0)
can they come out of their barracks at night yet? or is it still passed their bedtime?
Posted Jul-18-2009 BySIR#SPITFIRE (338.22) SIR#SPITFIRE View Channel Send Message
(-5)
LOL
Posted Jul-21-2009 Bydigidoctor (14.14) 
digidoctor View Channel Send Message
(-1)
German troops are hiding in their bunkers so ROE means nothing
Posted Jul-5-2009 ByUSA1 (3680.74) 
USA1 View Channel Send Message
(-8)
I'd hide in my bunker, too, if I had to operate under ROE like that. Mall cops have more authority to use deadly force than these poor guys.
Does anybody know if there is a simple ROE for Americans in-country?
Posted Jul-5-2009 Byjohn731863 (512.02) 
john731863 Send Message
(6)
My favorite bible story.
Posted Jul-5-2009 Bydevildriver- (170.84) devildriver- View Channel Send Message
(2)
Stop posting old crap from some old book.
Posted Jul-6-2009 ByDudio (165.12) Dudio Send Message
(3)
Only retard americans and muslims believe in "fairy tales".
Posted Jul-6-2009 ByV4.SKUNK (35.40) 
V4.SKUNK View Channel Send Message
(0)
Well i guess im glad i dont give a flying fuck what you think.
We will write you guys off when your country gets fucked by muslims.
Posted Jul-6-2009 Bydevildriver- (170.84) devildriver- View Channel Send Message
(0)