If you don't listen to Gore, why would you listen to Monkton? Do either submit papers in scientific journals for peer review by climatologists? This "debate" would disappear if the public had a better grasp of objective science and listened to the actual scientists... instead of public figureheads of the left or right that are just there to serve either confirmation bias.
Quoted comment by aaJax: If you don't listen to Gore, why would you listen to Monkton? Do either submit papers in scientific journals for peer review by climatologists? This "debate" would disappear if the public had a better grasp of objective science and listened to the actual scientists... instead of public figureheads of the left or right that are just there to serve either confirmation bias.
Did you even watch that? They aren't talking about scientific matters.
Quoted comment by aaJax: If you don't listen to Gore, why would you listen to Monkton? Do either submit papers in scientific journals for peer review by climatologists? This "debate" would disappear if the public had a better grasp of objective science and listened to the actual scientists... instead of public figureheads of the left or right that are just there to serve either confirmation bias.
Did you even watch that? They aren't talking about scientific matters.
I was refering to Monkton opinionating on the climate change topic at all, that being the more generalized context, but I understand that they were discussing related politics. My point still stands - why listen to the politicized rhetoric of either unless you are searching to hear what you want to hear. Seek out the accurate science and consensus of the men and women who have spent their education and profession learning about the issue. Yet folks prefer to parrot regurgitated opinion instead.
Quoted comment by aaJax: If you don't listen to Gore, why would you listen to Monkton? Do either submit papers in scientific journals for peer review by climatologists? This "debate" would disappear if the public had a better grasp of objective science and listened to the actual scientists... instead of public figureheads of the left or right that are just there to serve either confirmation bias.
Did you even watch that? They aren't talking about scientific matters.
I was refering to Monkton opinionating on the climate change topic at all, that being the more generalized context, but I understand that they were discussing related politics. My point still stands - why listen to the politicized rhetoric of either unless you are searching to hear what you want to hear. Seek out the accurate science and consensus of the men and women who have spent their education and profession learning about the issue. Yet folks prefer to parrot regurgitated opinion instead.
everyone of those political jerks from all over the world know dam well that money in any sense toward climate change is a money making scam.they are seemily agreeing with the enviro-bleeding hearts and
pick-pocketing their wallets and perhaps the greatest worldwide financial blunder ever.
Comments - sort by newest to oldest
uh oh...trouble o's
Posted Oct-31-2009 by "strip" (R)
You believe him because its the truth. OBAMA=ANTI-CHRIST! Wake the fu3k up and rise up Americans.
Posted Oct-31-2009 by "blackrabbit66" (R)
Yeah, that's the Britain we remember.
Posted Oct-31-2009 by "Sam_Spade" (R)
We are screwed!
Posted Oct-31-2009 by "biglick" (R)
If you don't listen to Gore, why would you listen to Monkton? Do either submit papers in scientific journals for peer review by climatologists? This "debate" would disappear if the public had a better grasp of objective science and listened to the actual scientists... instead of public figureheads of the left or right that are just there to serve either confirmation bias.
Posted Oct-31-2009 by "aaJax" (R)
If obama signs this treaty and alters any aspect of the constitution - All bets are off and he is ****ed ! ! !
Posted Oct-31-2009 by "kevinm16" (R)
Did you even watch that? They aren't talking about scientific matters.
Posted Oct-31-2009 by "Intellectual" (R)
Did you even watch that? They aren't talking about scientific matters.
I was refering to Monkton opinionating on the climate change topic at all, that being the more generalized context, but I understand that they were discussing related politics. My point still stands - why listen to the politicized rhetoric of either unless you are searching to hear what you want to hear. Seek out the accurate science and consensus of the men and women who have spent their education and profession learning about the issue. Yet folks prefer to parrot regurgitated opinion instead.
Posted Oct-31-2009 by "aaJax" (R)
The US economy is already destroyed. Too late, Lord Monkton.
Posted Oct-31-2009 by "Dunbal" (R)
I support that finding..well said
Posted Nov-3-2009 by "harleypiper" (R)
I think your 100% correct.I keep thinking that too.
Hes setting himself up for personal disaster.
if you get my drift
Posted Nov-3-2009 by "harleypiper" (R)
Did you even watch that? They aren't talking about scientific matters.
I was refering to Monkton opinionating on the climate change topic at all, that being the more generalized context, but I understand that they were discussing related politics. My point still stands - why listen to the politicized rhetoric of either unless you are searching to hear what you want to hear. Seek out the accurate science and consensus of the men and women who have spent their education and profession learning about the issue. Yet folks prefer to parrot regurgitated opinion instead.
everyone of those political jerks from all over the world know dam well that money in any sense toward climate change is a money making scam.they are seemily agreeing with the enviro-bleeding hearts and
pick-pocketing their wallets and perhaps the greatest worldwide financial blunder ever.
Posted Nov-3-2009 by "harleypiper" (R)