Safe Mode: On
Syrian referendum a sham

AS an exercise in self-delusion, it would be hard to surpass Syrian tyrant Bashar al-Assad's claim of 90 per cent support in a referendum to democratise his country. This is his answer, apart from the relentless butchery of his security forces, to the year-long protests that have now cost more than 8000 lives.
The constitutional changes are a cynical attempt to extend the life of Assad's evil regime with amendments that mean if he survives until his current term ends in 2014 he'll be eligible for two more seven-year terms. The much-trumpeted ending of six decades of one-party rule by the Arab Ba'ath Socialist Party is no less fraudulent, with the new Constitution providing for a strong presidency and weak parliament in which parties opposed to the dictator would be emasculated. In a country tearing itself apart, the 90 per cent voter support he claims is also nonsense _ even if not quite the 98 per cent he ludicrously claimed for himself in the 2007 presidential election. More than half the 13,000 polling stations were in government strongholds in Damascus, Aleppo and Latakia. That the referendum was a sham is as incontrovertible as the sad reality it will do nothing to end the violence or achieve the political transition urgently needed. Assad's bogus claims must be answered by a more concerted international drive to provide assistance for those seeking to end his dictatorship, or make him see sense.

Despite Russia and China's shameful support, Assad is now more isolated than ever. Even Hamas has turned on him, while delegates from 60 countries meeting in Tunis have backed the opposition and the EU has imposed stringent new sanctions, including a freeze on Syrian central bank assets. Understandably, despite the horrors, there is little appetite for military intervention like that in Libya. But measures can be taken. There is, for example, a strong case to be made for global support of a Turkish proposal to create humanitarian corridors from embattled Syrian communities to neighbouring countries, and to provide military training for opposition fighters. There's a telling malevolence in Assad's claim of electoral success when men, women and children are being mown down in droves. The tyrant must be left in no doubt the world sees the referendum for the fraudulent act of desperation that it is, and that the pressure on him will be ever more unrelenting until he halts the killing.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/syrian-referendum-a-sham/story-e6frg71x-1226284401562


Added: Feb-29-2012 Occurred On: Feb-29-2012
By: gatyair
In:
World News, Regional News, Politics, Other Middle East
Tags: Syria, Assad, referendum
Location: Damascus, Damascus Governorate, Syria (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 2077 | Comments: 42 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Assad is trying to move in the direction of the protesters and its clear the majority of the population either support the current regime or are extremely fearful of what could replace it. Remember the terrorists won't be holding any referendums! Taking up weapons doesn't make your protest legitimate.

    Posted Feb-29-2012 By 

    (2)

  • Yeah, lets get the Muslim Brotherhood into power in Syria...I am sure we'll have a Jeffersonian Democracy in place in no time, full of brotherly love for Israel, Lol

    Posted Feb-29-2012 By 

    (1)

    • @ElegantDecline
      You had quite a different set of principals regarding the revolution in Egypt; The MB coming to power was supposed to be some positive step towards democracy..
      In fact, way back in December, regarding the MB in Egypt you said:

      "This is a phase they have to go through to truly progress beyond"

      and

      "yes, they will have to go through Islam to get to where they're going.
      These people have no Civil Society, they have no knowledge of anything bar Dictatorship with an More..

      Posted Feb-29-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • @gatyair No change of heart, I'm merely making fun of you...

      Posted Feb-29-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @ElegantDecline
      Making fun of me? I remind you that you argued that islamist coming to power will actually usher in a democratic system. Now with this latest comment of yours, it sounds like you're being sarcastic about the same idea.
      So if there's no change of heart, am I to conclude that you support the uprising in Syria as a prelude to democratization?

      Posted Feb-29-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • @gatyair Yes, you're funny.
      Everything you post has the context of Israel within it.
      And this post implies as your others have, that a Muslim Bro/Salafi take over of Syria would be a good thing. I find that amusing actually.

      And yes, in Egypt, the most likely path to an eventually Democratic system with basic rights for all is going to have to be through the Islamist majority as in Turkey, not through an educated, liberal elite

      Posted Mar-1-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @ElegantDecline
      Yes, a great majority of my posts are related to Israel, I didn't realize that it's against LL's terms of service.
      I have an interest in Israel and when I read the crap posts and comments on LL, I find it hard not to retort. But all this has nothing to do with the substance of the post.
      With regards to Israel I don't see why a regime change matters. If the MB takes over Syria, what's the worst that can happen? they'll be hostile to Israel? they'll fund Hezbollah? provide a safe h More..

      Posted Mar-1-2012 By 

      (0)

  • For those wishing for the demise of the USA and the rapid ascension of China as the new dominant global power, behold your future.

    It is clear from this example where Russia and China are on the issue of human freedom and liberty.

    Posted Feb-29-2012 By 

    (0)

    • @USA1

      Same freedom and liberty you promised the Iraq's after your country invaded them based on lies and deception. Look how that ended up.

      Posted Feb-29-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • @MrG

      We made a mistake in invading Iraq and paid for that mistake dearly in blood and treasure. We fought honorably (99.9% of the time) and didn't steal their oil. In the end we left Iraqis free enough to fuck themselves over. At least they don't live in fear of Saddam anymore.

      My feeling is that Arabs/Shiites are too backward and brainwashed to live peacefully under a democratic system. Some cultures are doomed to failure.

      Without oil Arabs and Shia would be lower on the food chain than More..

      Posted Feb-29-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @USA1 Ha ha, you actually think any great power politics is about freedom and liberty?
      C'mon for chrissakes you've from Europe, you should have a little more healthy cynicism than that

      Posted Feb-29-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @USA1 You know, without oil, arguably they'd be higher up the food-chain, it's the old 'oil curse', a false sense of security that crushes the need for innovating anything else

      Posted Feb-29-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • @ElegantDecline

      Tell me which of the following American wars were not about freedom and liberty?

      American Wars

      The American Revolution
      1775-1783

      The Indian Wars
      1775-1890

      The Barbary Wars
      1800-1815
      Inter-State War
      The Barbary States
      (Tripoli, Algiers & Morocco)

      The War of 1812
      1812-1815
      Inter-State War
      Great Britain
      The Growing & Troubled Republic

      Mexican-American War
      1846-1848
      Inter-State War
      Mexico

      United States Civil War
      1861-1865
      Civil War
      United States (The North)
      vs.
      The More..

      Posted Feb-29-2012 By 

      (0)

  • Good anonymous piece of insight there , from Syria's close neighbour .
    Maybe they should get the fuck out if they don't like it . Isn't that what you tell internal dissidents ?

    Posted Feb-29-2012 By 

    (0)

  • So long as Russia, China and Iran are supporting him, he will stay in power. As Ambassador Susan Rice said "Your days are numbered," to Bashar, I can guarantee her and her likes that he will stay in power longer than her boss, and the clown that will come after him.

    Posted Feb-29-2012 By 

    (0)

  • I say let them handle thier own internal turmoil. If he/they need help, let the Muslims reach out to thier Muslim brethren.

    Wont matter that whatever we do, our country will get blamed for something if we intervene.

    This entire region only recognizes one thing: THE MOST BRUTAL WINS.

    Our western input to try to educate and help those who still have assbackwards beliefs of governing WON'T HELP JACK!

    FCUK ISLAM!!!!!!

    Posted Feb-29-2012 By 

    (0)

  • this story is not biased at all. It's like reading a high school essay.

    Posted Feb-29-2012 By 

    (0)

    • @Andy2012
      Of course it's biased, it's an opinion piece, but what's your point?
      Do you believe that the referendum was legitimate? Do you believe that for the past 12 years, 97-98% of Syrians elected and reelected the chinless bozo into (absolute) power?

      Posted Feb-29-2012 By 

      (0)

  • i could give less that a fuck about these russian and chinese owned clowns...i am actually rooting for them over Obamas Al Qeada Army though...fucking democrats, they should all be exiled.

    Posted Feb-29-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Propaganda. He is making major steps towards democracy. He never said he will seek re election for two terms! That is just propaganda, he has no intention of continuing beyond seeing his country succeed in the path of progression, not terrorism.

    Posted Feb-29-2012 By 

    (0)

    • Comment of user '2012TheEnd' has been deleted by author!
  • Ironic that the name for Syria in Arabic is.....

    Sham.

    Epic truth is epic in English.

    In arabic it means sun.

    Allah decreed it be called Sham for the English world to remember that an army of the anti-christ will appear from there (damascus namely) and they will fight against muslims.

    Posted Mar-1-2012 By 

    (0)

    • Comment of user '2012TheEnd' has been deleted by author!
  • Comment of user '2012TheEnd' has been deleted by author!
  • I wonder how it will end with this guy. Hopefully, Mussolini style or strung up like Saddam.

    Posted Feb-29-2012 By 

    (-1)