Safe Mode: On
North Carolina voters approve same-sex marriage ban

http://news.yahoo.com/north-carolina-voters-approve-amendment-banning-gay-marriage-015010138.html

RALEIGH, North Carolina (Reuters) - North Carolina voters on Tuesday approved a state constitutional amendment
that bans same-sex marriage and civil unions, major media projected,
dealing a blow to efforts across the United States to expand gay marriage rights.
The amendment,
which says marriage between a man and a woman is the only legally
recognized domestic union in the state, passed by a wide margin. With
half of the counties' results at least partially reported, about 61
percent of votes backed the amendment.
North Carolina law
already blocks gay and lesbian couples from marrying, but the state now
joins the rest of states in the Southeast in adding the prohibition to
its constitution.
Twenty-eight states have voter-approved constitutional bans on same-sex marriages, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.


Massachusetts,
Iowa, Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut, New York and the District of
Columbia allow gay and lesbian nuptials.
Maryland, New Jersey
and Washington state have passed laws this year approving same-sex
marriage, but Governor Chris Christie vetoed New Jersey's law and
opponents in Maryland and Washington are threatening ballot initiatives
to overturn those laws.
The vote in North Carolina followed statements by senior officials of President Barack Obama's administration this week which were interpreted as supporting gay marriage.


Vice President Joe Biden said on Sunday he was "absolutely comfortable" with allowing same-sex couples to wed, and Education Secretary Arne Duncan said gay marriage should be legal.


Obama has said he favors civil unions but has stopped short of supporting gay marriage.


Supporters of the amendment in North Carolina, a swing
state in the November 6 presidential election, said it would preserve
the sanctity of marriage between a man and a woman and make laws
forbidding gay marriage harder to repeal.
Opponents said a ban would jeopardize health insurance
benefits for unmarried gay and heterosexual couples and signal that the
state is unfriendly to a diverse workforce.
Former Democratic President Bill Clinton recorded a
call just ahead of the vote urging North Carolinians to reject the
proposed amendment.
"It won't change North Carolina's law on marriage," he said in a message sponsored by the Coalition to Protect North Carolina Families.
"What it will change is North Carolina's ability to keep good
businesses, attract new jobs and attract and keep talented
entrepreneurs."


Added: May-8-2012 
By: moonpie69
In:
Politics
Tags: North, Carolina, gay, marriage, ban
Marked as: approved
Views: 3262 | Comments: 65 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Comment of user 'BADMOSH_GURVINDER' has been deleted by author!
  • I don't know whats more gay, giving a shit about gays marrying or marrying gays.

    Posted May-9-2012 By 

    (2)

  • Is anybody actually surprised at this outcome from this state? Really?

    Posted May-9-2012 By 

    (2)

    • @BunkerGearGal so your saying you like elton john,liberace,greg louganis,ellen degeneris,martina navratolova,doogie houser and so on?

      Posted May-9-2012 By 

      (-2)

    • @Blackdawn

      Sir Elton? Yes, I like his music.

      Liberace? Before my time, not a fan.

      Greg Louganis? Not a fan.

      Ellen? A bit too perky for me, the "sincerity" seems fake to me.

      Martina? Not a tennis fan.

      Neil Patrick Harris? Absolutely a fan, yes.

      Posted May-9-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @BunkerGearGal I like elton john too lol! The rest no no and more no!

      Posted May-9-2012 By 

      (0)

  • I'm kind of on the fence here. While I believe strongly in state's rights I also support all voluntary associations between consenting adults. Generally, the less government interferes with people's private lives, the better.

    Posted May-9-2012 By 

    (2)

  • Comment of user 'Grammar Police' has been deleted by author!
  • Gay marriage is an oxymoron.

    Posted May-9-2012 By 

    (1)

  • As long as there are people, there are going to be gay people.. Let them get married and lets all move the fuck on.

    Posted May-9-2012 By 

    (1)

  • I don't get it. Can anyone explain why same sex domestic unions, regardless what you call them, should be banned? Isn't that an affront to individual liberties? What is the negative aspect of these unions? Anyone, just trying to educate myself on the subject, thanks.

    Posted May-9-2012 By 

    (1)

    • @mikedelta12

      It's the state and the culture there; the tyranny of the majority rules once again.

      Posted May-9-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @mikedelta12

      It's a direct infringement on liberty, absolutely.

      Civil unions between gay people don't affect the lives of straight people in the slightest. Who cares, as long as both parties involved are at or above the age of consent?

      Posted May-9-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @mikedelta12 this is just my thinking, but a "union" between any 2 individuals is an affront to civil liberties, we all know they're not gonna stick to it, given statistics.

      Posted May-9-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @PocoBueno

      That can be directly attributed to moral decay and a "progressive" shift in modern society. Voluntary marriage does not violate civil liberties at all.

      Posted May-9-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @WolfBite120 well you wouldn't be opposed to gay people getting "voluntarily" married then - my view is that they are cowards, just like so called heterosexual unions, just like people joining political parties. My suggestion to you is that marriage is the ultimate violation of civil liberties. As for moral decay, that's a decadent concept until it's properly challenged; I have witnessed young people from your country in such positions and they have not been found wanting.

      Posted May-9-2012 By 

      (0)

  • I gotta say the idea of anyone committing themselves to an individual to the extent of being "permanently" betrothed is ridiculous and antiquated. Personalities evolve; we move apart, we come closer together. Marriage is just another social control.

    Posted May-9-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Who cares who marries who, really? This should be a matter up to individual religious institutions. Why does the government get to say? Nobody is forcing you to morally agree with it.

    If your church doesn't want to condone same-sex marriages, don't perform them. If you do, fine, perform them.

    Nanny-state bullshit when it comes down to it.

    Posted May-9-2012 By 

    (0)

    • @jum_runky

      Well, here in America we have a voiciferous religious set who believe they're always right. They also believe Jesus is in possession of a valid United States Passport, Republican Party and NRA Membership Cards, and a wad of US Currency.

      This is the nanny state writ large, and the delicious irony is that these myopic simpletons who rage ad infinitum against the nanny state can't see that they're participants.

      I just open a beer and laugh.

      Posted May-9-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @BunkerGearGal

      : "This is the nanny state writ large, and the delicious irony is that these myopic simpletons who rage ad infinitum against the nanny state can't see that they're participants."
      Absolutely correct. They accept the intrusion on personal liberty because the subject in question happens to be one they disagree with.

      But the larger picture gets lost in the bigotry.

      Posted May-9-2012 By 

      (2)

  • Midieval retards. Separation of church and state ? No_fucking_way.

    Posted May-9-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Bad.

    Posted May-9-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Good for them.

    Posted May-9-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Totally unconstitutional! This does more than ban same sex marriages, but also strips away the rights of straight people too. Read up "Tea baggers"! Good for you! What's next? I have faith that it will be overturned.

    Posted May-9-2012 By 

    (0)

    • If the Amendment is passed, the application of North Carolina’s domestic violence laws themselves will be left open for question—threatening our state’s victims of domestic violence.
      Additionally, the work done by numerous state agencies relying upon current domestic violence laws will be thrown into flux, and the protections and resources afforded to North Carolinians in abusive relationships could be seriously and dangerously eroded.
      If the Amendment passes, the protections to members o More..

      Posted May-9-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @ILovePickles I Love You Pickles!
      Superb comment.

      Posted May-9-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @Rebel_Radius
      It's an inane comment. Read the initiative on the ballot itself.

      Posted May-9-2012 By 

      (0)

  • This is a great day in America! There is no place in my opinion in this world for homosexual relations anywhere! Men are supposed to fuck women not other men! Women are supposed to take a dick inside them although i do enjoy seeing a women muff diving every now and then! A great day for the heteroexual population of this world!

    Posted May-9-2012 By 

    (0)