F-35B Ship Suitability Testing
Added: Jul-21-2012
By: Ruffus
In: Weapons
Tags: F-35B, Aircraft, Awesome
Location: United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 1886 | Comments: 46 | Votes: 6 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
By: Ruffus
In: Weapons
Tags: F-35B, Aircraft, Awesome
Location: United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 1886 | Comments: 46 | Votes: 6 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
Items
-
F-16 Aircraft Footage
-
KC-130 refuels F-35B
-
F-35B Engine Run.
-
F-35B Lightning II Hovering
-
F-35B - Taking STOVL to a New Level
-
F-16 Aircraft
-
U.S. Marine Corps AV-8B Harrier transitioning to the F-35B Lightning II
-
F-35B STOVL Arrival at Eglin Air Force Base
-
F-35B Hover Pit Testing.
-
F-35B STOVL Test Flight
-
F-35B - Taking STOVL to a New Level
Advertisers
Full screen quality is very good.
Posted Jul-21-2012 ByRuffus (4308.54) 
Ruffus View Channel Send Message
(3)
@Ruffus Nice, V'd
Posted Jul-21-2012 Byp8urbyk5 (588.04) 
p8urbyk5 View Channel Send Message
(2)
Dear Santa......
Posted Jul-21-2012 ByYesImadick (752.70) 
YesImadick View Channel Send Message
(3)
@YesImadick Hahaha, LMFAO
Posted Jul-21-2012 Byp8urbyk5 (588.04) 
p8urbyk5 View Channel Send Message
(2)
Neat. Royal Navy received its first B variant the other day.
Posted Jul-21-2012 ByKPD (1210.50) 
KPD View Channel Send Message
(2)
@PaulDaniels
Are you going to cry?
Posted Jul-21-2012 ByMartyr_Machine (435.56) Martyr_Machine Send Message
(1)
@PaulDaniels
Not to mention 1/2 a trillion dollars a piece and a payload so small a helo could carry.
Posted Jul-21-2012 Bylinecrosser (155.98) 
linecrosser View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@PaulDaniels
If some of these liveleak people ever make it into positions of authority I might.
Posted Jul-21-2012 ByMartyr_Machine (435.56) Martyr_Machine Send Message
(0)
Nice plane.......
Posted Jul-21-2012 Byp8urbyk5 (588.04) 
p8urbyk5 View Channel Send Message
(2)
we,ve just got the first of 48 of these....love to see them in action
Posted Jul-21-2012 Byharv (120.72) 
harv View Channel Send Message
(1)
@harv Still a long way off till they come into service .i don't think the uk will have a carrier until about 2020
Posted Jul-21-2012 Bymarkymark69 (547.34) markymark69 View Channel Send Message
(1)
@markymark69 this country is fucked...anyone could walk in and take over...and the government is still cutting our armed services even more...fuckin disgrace...
Posted Jul-22-2012 Byharv (120.72) 
harv View Channel Send Message
(0)
@harv Yeah I know .it amazing that they cut the harriers .of all the things to cut ,disgraceful .gotta be a really demoralizing time for the armed forces .i think they will fing recruitment much harder cos people are loosing there pride in the military .fucking shame
Posted Jul-22-2012 Bymarkymark69 (547.34) markymark69 View Channel Send Message
(1)
Air-superiority. The lesson of WWII, we will never lose it. Nice post thanks Ruffus
Posted Jul-21-2012 Bymarc1921 (1458.16) 
marc1921 View Channel Send Message
(1)
@marc1921 bankruptcy > flying toys
Posted Jul-21-2012 ByAllenZulu (87.10) 
AllenZulu View Channel Send Message
(0)
@AllenZulu Thats one mans opinion.
Posted Jul-21-2012 Bymarc1921 (1458.16) 
marc1921 View Channel Send Message
(1)
Just a few $ in that vid, just a few...
Posted Jul-21-2012 ByObba41 (374.56) 
Obba41 View Channel Send Message
(1)
kinda boring vid though. sweet plane
Posted Jul-22-2012 ByRUMRUNNER (64.14) 
RUMRUNNER View Channel Send Message
(0)
Ah, the f-35 remembers me the Robotech spaceships.
Posted Jul-21-2012 ByPanzerknacker2 (4091.02) 
Panzerknacker2 View Channel Send Message
(0)
Great vid! Voted.
Posted Jul-23-2012 Bysmokey75 (1433.66) 
smokey75 View Channel Send Message
(0)
A *pit bull* of a fighter design.
Posted Jul-21-2012 Bylakota74 (61.08) 
lakota74 View Channel Send Message
(0)
@lakota74
With the high wing loading it's no fighter. This thing will be decimated by modern 4th generation fighters. It depends on a very small BVR defensive armament close in it's meat on the table.
Posted Jul-21-2012 ByACunningDisguise (8.20) 
ACunningDisguise View Channel Send Message
(0)
Good enough to replace the Harrier, but its no dogfighter.
Posted Jul-21-2012 Byoldboy6o4 (210.30) 
oldboy6o4 View Channel Send Message
(0)
@oldboy6o4 I believe f22 is the dogfighter, this was supposed to more of a bomber?
Posted Jul-21-2012 ByEMAG-K (518.22) EMAG-K View Channel Send Message
(0)
@EMAG-K Multirole aircraft .highlt capable and will take out most aircraft before they even see it
Posted Jul-21-2012 Bymarkymark69 (547.34) markymark69 View Channel Send Message
(2)
@markymark69 "they even see it" was a good selling point. Not reality tho´.
http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-NOTAM-140909-1.html
http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-2008-09.html
I just try to stick to the facts, not fanboyism.
Posted Jul-21-2012 ByEMAG-K (518.22) EMAG-K View Channel Send Message
(0)
@markymark69 Beyond visual range combat is still somewhat of a myth. In actual combat situations the rules of engagement still usually require visual identification of targets. That's how it was with the invasion of Iraq in 2003.
Posted Jul-21-2012 ByEpic_Beard_Man (412.60) Epic_Beard_Man View Channel Send Message
(0)
@EMAG-K
Did the F35 hurt your feelings or you just normally decide to go on random crusades against inanimate objects?
Links to Soviet propaganda essays aren't really "proof" either...
Posted Jul-21-2012 ByMartyr_Machine (435.56) Martyr_Machine Send Message
(2)
Interesting how the elevons are angled so steeply downward when it does those short takeoffs. Guess it has something to do with it being fly by wire instead of having a natural balance.
Posted Jul-21-2012 ByIntellectual (752.84) Intellectual View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Intellectual Do you have a clue what fly by wire means?
Posted Jul-21-2012 Bydavid2dogs (244.26) 
david2dogs View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Intellectual It has to do with keeping the air mass from the vectored thrust under the aircraft at a higher pressure then above the aircraft, thus producing lift.
Posted Jul-21-2012 Bydav1936531 (503.62) 
dav1936531 View Channel Send Message
(0)
After almost a decade they are going to finally be used. I was starting to wonder if we built them just to see if we could, or actually use them.
Posted Jul-21-2012 Byxerodfx (312.90) 
xerodfx View Channel Send Message
(0)