Safe Mode: On
Conyers Subpoenas Karl Rove - Feb 2

CONYERS SUBPOENAS KARL ROVE

Monday, January 26, 2009

Conyers Subpoenas Karl Rove: "It's Time to Talk"

(Washington, D.C.) --- Today, House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, Jr. issued a subpoena to Karl Rove requiring him to testify regarding his role in the Bush Administration's politicization of the Department of Justice, including the US Attorney firings and the prosecution of former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman. The subpoena was issued pursuant to authority granted in H.R. 5 (111th Congress), and calls for Mr. Rove to appear at deposition on Monday, February 2, 2009. Mr. Rove has previously refused to appear in response to a Judiciary Committee subpoena, claiming that even former presidential advisers cannot be compelled to testify before Congress. That "absolute immunity" position was supported by then-President Bush, but it has been rejected by U.S. District Judge John Bates and President Obama has previously dismissed the claim as "completely misguided."

"I have said many times that I will carry this investigation forward to its conclusion, whether in Congress or in court, and today's action is an important step along the way," said Mr. Conyers. Noting that the change in administration may impact the legal arguments available to Mr. Rove in this long-running dispute, Mr. Conyers added "Change has come to Washington, and I hope Karl Rove is ready for it. After two years of stonewalling, it's time for him to talk."

A copy of the subpoena is attached.


***************************************************


Raw Story - Nick Juliano: Former White House adviser Karl Rove has ignored a subpoena from congressional Democrats to testify about allegations of political pressure at the Justice Department and his alleged role in the prosecution of a former governor of Alabama.

A House subcommittee voted 7-1 Thursday to reject Rove's claim that executive privilege freed him from an obligation to testify, leaving open the possibility the Republican political guru will be held in contempt.

During the hearing, Rep. Chris Cannon (R-UT) revealed that Rove was out of the country. According to the liberal blog ThinkProgress, Rove's lawyer's confirmed that Rove was out of the country on a trip scheduled long before the subpoena was sent.

Karl Rove failed to appear before the House Judiciary subcommittee. His lawyer revealed that he was out of the country.

This video is from U.S. House, broadcast July 10, 2008.

Loading the player ...
Embed Code
Plays: 6313 (Embed: 0)


Added: Jan-27-2009 Occurred On: Jan-27-2009
By: danimation
In:
News
Tags: karl rove, subpoena, treason, propaganda, joseph geobbels
Marked as: approved
Views: 7816 | Comments: 10 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • BS. Karl Rove is untouchable. The guy should be thrown in jail but ... he has too many friends in powerfull positions.

    Posted Jan-27-2009 By 

    (0)

  • democrats don't have the guts to fight this sort of thing like it should be. Politics based hiring has no place in the justice system.

    Posted Jan-27-2009 By 

    (0)

    • problem is, there is nothing in the laws saying that an adminstration can't do it. obama could fire every one of bush's picks today and fill the slots with partisan toadies and no one could do a fucking thing about it. reform the selection process, then you could make that argument.

      Posted Jan-27-2009 By 

      (0)

    • No, hiring based on politics is illegal and still is. Firing the whole team is another subject, many presidents have done just that, nothing wrong there. But they cannot use the kind of tactics used when it comes to hiring US prosecutors and their staff. This is the same law that goes for almost the entire federal government, you cannot ask about ones political beliefs when hiring. Appointments are another story, but the subject here is broad and not what you claim.

      Posted Jan-27-2009 By 

      (0)

    • Problem is it was and still is against the law to fire these people based on their political beliefs, that is what went on. Also Rove should be in trouble for the Siegleman prosecution, he was clearly involved.

      Posted Jan-27-2009 By 

      (0)

    • then how can you argue that all appointments and firings of u.s. attorneys aren't politically motivated, when these individuals are appointed by the president and his administration. I don't agree with politically-motivated hirings/firings, but where was the outrage when clinton purged the system and put in his appointees? when any other president has come in and installed their appointees? it seems it only matters whether there is a D or R next to the administration's name...

      Posted Jan-27-2009 By 

      (0)

    • Hey, thanks for the civil reply!
      What Clinton did, along with most presidents when they start their term, is legal and within the guidelines.
      What Bush did was not the same, he fired some of those that didn't go along with his political jive, that is clearly illegal. What Bush did was fire US sub. AG's that he had appointed after he didn't get political prosecutions out of them that he wanted, this is illegal. Clinton fired the ones that Bush 1 had appointed like any president coming into office More..

      Posted Jan-27-2009 By 

      (1)

  • Conyers wants Karl to do some babysitting for him and drive him about Washington is all

    Posted Jan-27-2009 By 

    (-2)

  • dude, let it go. Clinton and his cronies never were touched after they left office. getting rove in is like pulling teeth.

    Posted Jan-27-2009 By 

    (-2)