Safe Mode: On
68 Nobel Prize-Winning Scientists Endorse President Obama’s Science Policies

By Sean Pool
October 17, 2012


The Center for American Progress Action Fund today received an open letter
co-signed by 68 Nobel laureates in physics, chemistry, and medicine.
The letter strongly endorses President Barack Obama’s science policies.
“America’s economic future,” the letter begins, “depends on our ability
to continue America’s proud legacy of discovery and invention.”
In the letter the Nobel Prize-winning scientists contrast President
Obama’s programs to train young Americans in science and technology,
strengthen science-based decisionmaking in government, and increase
investments in science and innovation, with Republican presidential
candidate Mitt Romney’s budget proposal, which would slash these
investments. Indeed, according to the American Association for the
Advancement of Science, Rep. Paul Ryan’s (R-WI) budget plan, which Gov.
Romney endorsed, would invest fully one-quarter less in nondefense
research and development compared to the president’s plan.
“The Nobelists’ commitment to a prosperous future built on innovation
is in the finest spirit of the Founding Fathers and expresses a core
American value,” said Jonathan D. Moreno, Editor-in-Chief of Science
Progress Action and Senior Fellow at CAP Action. “In this time of
economic recovery, we must keep our eye on the horizon by investing in
the science, technology, education, and workforce we need to stay on the
cutting edge and compete in a world economy where success is
increasingly determined by our ability to out-invent and out-innovate
our competitor nations.
Spanning several generations, the Nobelists are themselves fine
examples of how public investments in science lead to a substantial
return on our nation’s investment. James Watson, who won the Nobel Prize
in 1962 at age 34 for his work on the way DNA and RNA work together to
create proteins, is now 84, and Charles Townes, inventor of the
precursor to the laser and winner of the prize in 1964, is now 97. Among
the most recent winners of the prize is Robert Lefkowitz, who won the
prize earlier this month for revealing the inner workings of an
important family of receptors that govern how cells in the body
communicate with one another.
These are America’s most accomplished scientists, and their
discoveries have led to real progress. Without James Watson’s discovery
of the structure and function of DNA and RNA, we would not have a
biotechnology industry that contributes nearly $1 trillion annually to
the U.S. economy. And Charles Townes’s discovery of the maser, which
later led to the laser, has touched nearly every industry and countless
everyday products, from DVDs to LASIK eye surgery to precision
manufacturing.
At CAP Action we believe public investments in science and technology
are the bedrock of our nation’s economy and key to future prosperity.
Indeed, another Nobel laureate, Robert Solow, won the prize in economics
in 1987 for showing that more than half of the wealth our nation has
created since World War II stems directly from technological innovation.
The iPhone 5 alone, which itself contains countless inventions that
arose from federally funded research, is predicted to add between
one-quarter and one-half of a percentage point to our nation’s gross
domestic product this year, according to the chief U.S. economist at
JPMorgan.
“As a nation we must continue the investments that revolutionized
agriculture, invented the Internet, gave us modern medicine, and enabled
a strong national defense. Abandoning this tradition would be a
devastating step backwards,” the 68 Nobel laureates conclude.
But the evidence shows that the public’s investments in science and
technology pay off. If we’re serious about creating jobs and growing the
economy for the long term, then Gov. Romney and his allies in Congress
have it backward: It’s not that we can’t afford to increase our
investments in science. It’s that we can’t afford not to.
Read the full letter here.


Sean Pool is a policy analyst for science and innovation policy
at the Center for American Progress Action Fund, and managing editor of
Science Progress Action.


Added: Oct-19-2012 Occurred On: Oct-19-2012
By: dcmfox
In:
Other News, Politics
Tags: 68, nobel, prize, winning, scientist, endorse, Obama
Marked as: approved
Views: 1174 | Comments: 85 | Votes: 1 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 8 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • you mean a group of communists support the commie President!!!







    I'M SHOCKED!!! SHOCKED!

    Posted Oct-19-2012 By 

    (9)

    • @JihadKiller1s1k
      you mean, campaign doners who claim high awards

      Posted Oct-19-2012 By 

      (4)

    • @JihadKiller1s1k A group of communists? Yeah i guess thats the easiest explanation for your insufficient brain. I have an idea lets claim blasphemy, I mean all they do is discredit religion and cast spells all day. Lets have a witch-hunt. Fucking knob go back to the 12th century.

      Posted Oct-20-2012 By 

      (-1)

  • The Nobel committees are themselves extreme leftists.

    Academia is dominated by Marxist/Socialist politics.

    So what else should we expect?

    Posted Oct-19-2012 By 

    (8)

    • @NotJim

      Getting real fucking sick of Marxist/Socialist politics bullshit.

      Fuck you Jim.

      Posted Oct-19-2012 By 

      (-4)

    • @dcmfox
      lol, calm down what did you think the comments were going to look like ? Or throw a hissy and go on a thumbdown rampage and make us all laugh.

      Posted Oct-19-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @dcmfox Does someone have a coke bottle stuck up the butt

      Posted Oct-19-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @dcmfox

      Zap! Right in the heart.

      Posted Oct-19-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @NotJim Our greatest minds are left wing? No way! You mean intelligent people believe in liberal ideals, the thought that a government should be able to sustain its people, that its people should be able to sustain their country in return. They believe in science and exploration and learning instead of being bent over by religion and its constant "moral superiority". I'll throw in with the people who can explain our DNA or put a Rocket into space, instead of bible thumping right wing m More..

      Posted Oct-20-2012 By 

      (0)

  • So scientists are expert economists now ?

    This press release is an over-extension of their expertise into the non-science fields of politics and economics. This is sufficient to question whether these prize winners are genuine scientists or merely self-promoters.

    Posted Oct-19-2012 By 

    (6)

    • @Cadae Have you ever met a stupid scientist?

      Posted Oct-20-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @hellgremlin:YES! Outside of their area of expertise many have little common sense or understanding of human nature. Most spend their time dealing with “theory” not what actually works in the real world.

      The Nazis had some of the top scientists of their day working with the Nazi party elite on their “scientific policies”.

      Posted Oct-20-2012 By 

      (2)

  • This would hold more weight if the Nobel Peace Prize had not sold out, and is now meaningless.

    Posted Oct-19-2012 By 

    (6)

    • @wharris
      I thought the same thing when I heard Obummer got one of them.
      When I was a kid and heard about how great the prize was, I wondered how I could get one. Apparently destroying the world's greatest nation is a hell of an accomplishment. Especially in 3+1/2 years!

      Posted Oct-19-2012 By 

      (5)

  • The Nobel Prize....after its latest recipients it's almost embarrassing to get awarded it.
    It's kind of like having Pelosi and Reid on your side.

    Posted Oct-19-2012 By 

    (6)

    • @Gulf Flyer You really think our kids are going to look in the history books at the US's first black president who was also a nobel prize winner, and say "wow that's embarrassing" I get it now, youre all just fucking nuts.

      Posted Oct-20-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @Adirondack13 I don't think most people...MOST could care less if he's black, white, blue, or green...that's a lable given by liberals.

      Posted Oct-20-2012 By 

      (0)

  • Obama won the prize, not for being Nobel’s “champion of peace,” for he had no track record, no evidence to show that he actually had the ability, or the knowledge or the drive or the character to be a champion of peace. He got the prize because the committee was thrilled he was not George W. Bush.

    The Nobel Peace Prize Is Slipping Into Irrelevance

    Posted Oct-19-2012 By 

    (6)

  • Comment of user 'DirtyUncleBerty' has been deleted by author!
    • @DirtyUncleBerty Sorry dude, but the Republicans have the market cornered on "vote for us or lose your job" schemes.

      Posted Oct-20-2012 By 

      (0)

    • Comment of user 'DirtyUncleBerty' has been deleted by author!
    • @DirtyUncleBerty "This whole climate change thing" is a cause for concern among any intelligent individuals who can see the evidence for themselves. You only think it can't be proven because that's the side you've taken, but it's the wrong side to be on.

      Global warming is quite real. It's unfortunate so many have been led to believe it isn't... by a political party whose board of science includes guys like Todd Akin.

      Posted Oct-20-2012 By 

      (0)

    • Comment of user 'DirtyUncleBerty' has been deleted by author!
    • @DirtyUncleBerty Yes, something *is.* Global temperatures rising. Deserts expanding. Species vanishing at a rate last seen during the Great Extinction. Disappearing megafauna. Ocean acidification. All these things are happening right now.

      Posted Oct-20-2012 By 

      (0)

  • Lets see,
    oBama got a peace prize.... in war



    seems legit

    Posted Oct-19-2012 By 

    (5)

    • @Airedale

      Yeah, he did, in Bush's war. Bush starts them, Obama doesn't.

      Need more wars? Elect Romney.



      Remember Bush and his religious values put a damper on Stem Cell research? Obama ended that stunt so we can have better medicine.

      Posted Oct-19-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • Comment of user 'Leon233' has been deleted by author!
    • Comment of user 'Leon233' has been deleted by author!
    • @Rhemis

      Immediately call whine-one-one, and asked for a waabulance. HURRY, your bubble is about to burst.

      Posted Oct-19-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @Rhemis

      What about Obama's bombing run in Libya? What about his Iranian sanctions, which are an act of war?

      Posted Oct-19-2012 By 

      (1)

  • I didn't know such educated men could just be so dam stupid.

    Posted Oct-20-2012 By 

    (5)

  • progressive propaganda. i you want a leftist view ask the leftists.

    Posted Oct-19-2012 By 

    (4)

  • Yeah, because the Nobel Piece Prize isn't the biggest joke, anyway... The Nobel Piece Prize is phony and they showed their true colors when Obama was awarded the prize. It showed how retarded the award is.

    Posted Oct-19-2012 By 

    (4)

    • Comment of user 'LSDforuandme' has been deleted by author!
    • @LSDforuandme What an absurd comment. Seriously comparing the US to third world countries nowadays are we.. Actual German or are you an immigrant..? Respond please, regardless of your answer, this should be good.. Name one aspect.. Confusing politics with science?

      Posted Oct-19-2012 By 

      (4)

    • @LSDforuandme That kind of thinking shows you have no idea. What the hell did the great Leader get it for?
      1. Nuclear proliferation? Your kidding right?
      2. "new climate" in international relations? He has not done JACK since the Apology tour thru Europe.
      3. especially in reaching out to the Muslim world? And the Middles East is really stable right? The love us to death right?

      You have taken to much LSD in your life.

      Posted Oct-20-2012 By 

      (3)

    • @Biker15k You wanna know why Obama got the Nobel? Notice how he got the award very shortly after becoming president, without any specific achievements cited as the reason for the prize?

      It's because of what he represents.

      The Nobel Prize was awarded to Obama to celebrate a major miracle: that a racist-infested hate hole like the USA could elect a black president, demonstrates its social and cultural evolution.

      Yours is the nation that, half a century ago, forced blacks to drink from separate More..

      Posted Oct-20-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • @LSDforuandme: Did you know Hitler was nominated in the 30s smart guy? Stalin was nominated in 45'. Typical smug fart smelling Euro clown, you THINK you are smart but you live in a state run media fantasy world.

      Posted Oct-20-2012 By 

      (2)

  • Doesn't say much for the nobel prize selection process

    Posted Oct-20-2012 By 

    (4)

    • @HalfChuck

      it says what it's supposed to say, you expecting it to say something else is the problem.

      the nobel prize in physics, chemistry, physiology or medicine and literature are awarded by the royal swedish academy of sciences for outstanding contributions in their respective fields.
      They have nothing to do with politics. Politics are not allowed to be a part of the deciding process or a determining factor.

      The nobel peace prize on the other hand is a different story. it's awarded by a 5 More..

      Posted Oct-20-2012 By 

      (0)

  • And what science policies are those? Why would I follow the globalist progressives agenda? The Nazis had some of the best "scientists" and engineers of the day, I wouldn't follow them either.

    Perhaps they need a government funded grant and they know Obama throws cash around like a drunken pimp.

    Posted Oct-20-2012 By 

    (4)

  • Gee..... ya think?

    Posted Oct-19-2012 By 

    (3)

  • Big whoop, Hugo Chávez the leader of United Socialist Party of Venezuela does too. This election has been a great process to really identify the true idiots.

    Posted Oct-19-2012 By 

    (3)