Safe Mode: On
The Great Global Warming Swindle

The other side of the coin

Loading the player ...
Embed Code
Plays: 5176 (Embed: 0)

Added: Oct-12-2009 
By: ubdumb
In: Other
Tags: Global Warming, Al Gore, Obama, Cap And Trade, Taxes, Farce, Swindle
Marked as: approved
Views: 6126 | Comments: 10 | Votes: 5 | Favorites: 2 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.

  • aaaahhhh...Mother Nature...Confusing scientists on a daily basis. LOL

    Posted Oct-12-2009 By 
    boomersooner (2093.44)  

    (3)

  • Comment of user 'proteus97' has been deleted by author!

  • Right on! Expose the lies, and they lying liars who tell them! I think "Global warming" is part-and-parcel to another gigantic racket. And unlike on alternative energy, many governments are moving incredibly quickly to act on it. "Cash for cars" is just the first of their idiotic and hugely expensive schemes in the name of this gigantic, expensive lie, "Cap and Trade" is the next one!

    Posted Oct-12-2009 By 
    Hitler_Is_Amazing (2955.28)  
    Hitler_Is_Amazing
    View Channel
    Send Message

    (0)

  • "The Great Global Warming Swindle" has been completely destroyed as a credible, reliable movie. Durkin was actually sued by one of the few scientists who does not support climate change for misusing his data.

    Posted Oct-12-2009 By 
    Lazerhead (277.58)

    (0)

  • Global Warming is a swindling the corporate swindlers who distress the world over an unsustainable thirst for oil and other natural resources.

    So far it's working, and I'm glad.

    Posted Oct-12-2009 By 
    bro77dog (519.74)  

    (-1)

  • What a steaming pile of BS! Junk science and misleading statements. This is a lot like the anti-evolution arguments.

    Check out Nicenecounsil.com for more religious based nonsense. They use the quote "The sacred and inspired Scriptures are sufficient to declare the truth." So much for the Scientific Method.

    The Great Global Warming Swindle has been dismissed an debunked long ago. Here's a vid that points out the bad science they use:
    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e94_124623 More..

    Posted Oct-12-2009 By 
    MBrad-C13 (678.44)

    (-2)

    • ahhh, you seem like such a unhappy little camper. what was just shown, debunked your sources, on the topic. remember a few years ago, they blamed it on all the cows farting, it's caused by methane gas from the cows farting, kill all the cows,to save the world.my house is total electric and for the last 4 years my electric bill has been lower than ever. just haven't had to use the air conditioner as much.....voted

      Posted Oct-12-2009 By 
      star53 (32497.10)  

      (1)

    • You voted because the video told you what you wanted to hear. The documentary has been discredited and your anecdotal experience has little relevance.

      Posted Oct-12-2009 By 
      MBrad-C13 (678.44)

      (-1)

    • Interestingly they never, ever mention mention faith or religious issues. How is it again that that it is religious based? You would think they would have to at least MENTION religious issues for it to be the basis of their argument. Or, perhaps you are full of it?

      BTW, the quote "The sacred and inspired Scriptures are sufficient to declare the truth," refers to the Gorites and Climate Change Goons who are beating the drum of man-made global warming. It has no basis in hard scienc More..

      Posted Oct-12-2009 By 
      Stranger456 (170.06)

      (2)

    • ubdumb got this video from wherever the Nicenecounsil posted it. I am aware that they didn't make it. Climate deniers tend to be of the right-wing ideology. Many deniers are anti-science zealots.

      Your argument that man-made global warming has no basis in hard science is hilarious. I could provide you with links to institutes such as NASA and NOAA that would prove otherwise.

      Posted Oct-12-2009 By 
      MBrad-C13 (678.44)

      (0)