Safe Mode: On
WikiLeaks: US targets EU over GM crops

GM corn variety. Photograph: Sipa Press/Rex Features

The US embassy in Paris advised Washington to start a military-style trade war against any European Union[1] country which opposed genetically modified (GM) crops, newly released WikiLeaks cables show.

In response to moves by France to ban a Monsanto GM corn variety in late 2007, the ambassador, Craig Stapleton, a friend and business partner of former US president George Bush, asked Washington to penalise the EU and particularly countries which did not support the use of GM crops[2].

“Country team Paris recommends that we calibrate a target retaliation list that causes some pain across the EU since this is a collective responsibility, but that also focuses in part on the worst culprits.

“The list should be measured rather than vicious and must be sustainable over the long term, since we should not expect an early victory. Moving to retaliation will make clear that the current path has real costs to EU interests and could help strengthen European pro-biotech voices,” said Stapleton, who with Bush co-owned the St Louis-based Texas Rangers baseball team in the 1990s.

In other newly released cables, US diplomats around the world are found to have pushed GM crops as a strategic government and commercial imperative.

Because many Catholic bishops in developing countries have been vehemently opposed to the controversial crops, the US applied particular pressure to the pope’s advisers.

Cables from the US embassy in the Vatican[3] show that the US believes the pope is broadly supportive of the crops after sustained lobbying of senior Holy See advisers, but regrets that he has not yet stated his support. The US state department special adviser on biotechnology as well as government biotech advisers based in Kenya lobbied Vatican insiders to persuade the pope to declare his backing. “… met with [US monsignor] Fr Michael Osborn of the Pontifical Council Cor Unum, offering a chance to push the Vatican on biotech issues, and an opportunity for post to analyse the current state of play on biotech in the Vatican generally,” says one cable in 2008.

“Opportunities exist to press the issue with the Vatican, and in turn to influence a wide segment of the population in Europe and the developing world,” says another.

But in a setback, the US embassy found that its closest ally on GM, Cardinal Renato Martino, head of the powerful Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace and the man who mostly represents the pope at the United Nations, had withdrawn his support for the US.

“A Martino deputy told us recently that the cardinal had co-operated with embassy Vatican on biotech over the past two years in part to compensate for his vocal disapproval of the Iraq war and its aftermath – to keep relations with the USG [US government] smooth. According to our source, Martino no longer feels the need to take this approach,” says the cable.

In addition, the cables show US diplomats working directly for GM companies such as Monsanto. “In response to recent urgent requests by [Spanish rural affairs ministry] state secretary Josep Puxeu and Monsanto, post requests renewed US government support of Spain[4]‘s science-based agricultural biotechnology position through high-level US government intervention.”

It also emerges that Spain and the US have worked closely together to persuade the EU not to strengthen biotechnology laws[5]. In one cable, the embassy in Madrid writes: “If Spain falls, the rest of Europe will follow.”

The cables show that not only did the Spanish government ask the US to keep pressure on Brussels but that the US knew in advance how Spain would vote[6], even before the Spanish biotech commission had reported.
References

1. ^ More from guardian.co.uk on European Union (www.guardian.co.uk)
2. ^ penalise the EU and particularly countries which did not support the use of GM crops (213.251.145.96)
3. ^ More from guardian.co.uk on Vatican (www.guardian.co.uk)
4. ^ More from guardian.co.uk on Spain (www.guardian.co.uk)
5. ^ persuade the EU not to strengthen biotechnology laws (213.251.145.96)
6. ^ US knew in advance how Spain would vote (213.251.145.96)

Excerpted from WikiLeaks: US targets EU over GM crops | World news | The Guardian

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jan/03/wikileaks-us-eu-gm-crops

Readability — An Arc90 Laboratory Experiment http://lab.arc90.com/experiments/readability
Follow us on Twitter »Readability version 1.7.1


Added: Jan-18-2011 Occurred On: Jan-17-2011
By: whiterabbit1
In:
Iraq, News
Tags: WikiLeaks:, US, targets, EU, over, GM, crops,
Marked as: approved
Views: 6991 | Comments: 23 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Fuck GM foods, we didn't have a say, Bush senior pushed that shit through without a peep to us on our "News" and we've been fucked ever since.

    I suggest everyone watch "The World According to Monsanto"

    http://www.veoh.com/browse/videos/category/technology/watch/v8968165kYRdfmYC

    These fuckers are the deffinition of evil and they control us as much as any corporation ever could

    Posted Jan-18-2011 By 

    (8)

  • No fucking way will i or any farmers i know let that shit into Wales.

    Posted Jan-18-2011 By 

    (6)

  • Here's the full documentary

    http://twilightearth.com/news/the-world-according-to-monsanto-full-documentary/


    Boot Lickers need not apply

    Posted Jan-18-2011 By 

    (5)

  • Is it modified to where you can't seed out of your own crop like they did tomatoes here, I wouldn't trust anything Monsanto does

    Posted Jan-18-2011 By 

    (5)

  • Genetically modified food, yea this sounds like a good idea, sure, why not, and what happens when this backfires?, is this ringing a bell in anyones head?!...

    Posted Jan-18-2011 By 

    (4)

  • Julian Assange is a hero...sad that it will take a while for most people to realize that, just as it took a while for Koestler, Steffens, Tarbell, Hirsch, etc...

    Posted Jan-18-2011 By 

    (4)

  • GM crops another scam to rip off the world and fulfill the depopulation agenda,once you start growing GM crops the soil will burn and you can not grow any organic(natural crops)on affected soil without a fertilizer,the purpose for monsanto to spread this unhealthy GM crop world wide is simple to create a lifetime profit because monsanto will be the only supplier of GM crops and the right fertilizer.stay away from this evil GM crops it's a war against nature or GOD.

    Posted Jan-19-2011 By 

    (2)

  • I wouldn't put too stock in anything from the left-wing Guardian or the wacky far left rabbit. But I will say that Monsanto GM corn has been one of the worst agricultural and food developments for the US since lead soup.

    Heck, you can't even eat the stuff. It's used to formulate other foods and has zero nutritional value.

    Posted Jan-18-2011 By 

    (1)

  • First time wikileaks was talked about on FOX news a beloved host, Megyn Kelly, introduced wikileaks as a "far leftist organization leaking top secret military documents" and for the fair and balanced debate it was Megyn Kelly and some ex military official vs some batshit loon from code pink. Any follow ups by Fox were focused around the messenger and the DOD claims that lives were put at risk. FOX was no exception as the reports from MSNBC and CNN were similar in their attempts to shoo More..

    Posted Jan-18-2011 By 

    (1)

  • Comment of user 'gregory_peckory' has been deleted by author!
  • GM foods allow more crop yield per acre, better disease resistance, crops that are able to thrive in harsh climates with less water, and many other great advantages. GM foods also offer the best chance to eliminate famine worldwide.

    Posted Jan-18-2011 By 

    (-6)

    • exactly....and how many people enjoy a banana? Did they know that every banana is a GM clone? A natural banana is inedible.

      Posted Jan-18-2011 By 

      (-3)

    • So why does every person in the world hate mosanto?

      Posted Jan-18-2011 By 

      (1)

    • Bullshit. What complete twaddle. Traditional hybridization or breeding involves crossing different varieties of similar organisms together to produce one with better common attributes. So a banana was made tastier by combining it with other banana plants - or very similar fruits that would interbreed.

      GM involves a process exactly how it sounds, you splice a gene from any, often completely un related organism into your target product in the hopes of producing an improvement. So we take genes More..

      Posted Jan-19-2011 By 

      (1)

    • but you dont get viable seeds from them so you are always on the corporate tit

      Posted Jan-19-2011 By 

      (0)

    • Comment of user 'pootin' has been deleted by author!