(CNSNews.com) - There were 195,000 fewer people employed in the
United States in July than in June, according to the Bureau of Labor
Statistics, as the national unemployment rate ticked up from 8.2 percent
to 8.3 percent.
Meanwhile, 150,000 people simply dropped out of the labor force during the month and did not seek to find a job.
In June, according to BLS, there had been 142,415,000 people employed in the United States. In July, that dropped to 142,220,000--a decline of 195,000.
Similarly, in June, there were 155,163,000 people in the civilian labor force
in the United States. To be counted in the civilian labor force, person
must be 16 years old or older, not be in the military, prison or a
mental institution, and either have a job or have actively looked for a
job in the past four weeks.
In July, the number of people in the civilian labor force was 155,013,000--a decline of 150,000 from June.
The number of people who were unemployed--meaning they were 16 or
older, not in the military, a prison or a mental institution, and had
actively looked for a job in the last four weeks-jumped by 45,000 during
the month, climbing from 12,749,000 in June to 12,794,000 in July.
During July, the number of people who simply left the labor force
(150,000) exceeded the number of newly unemployed (45,000) by more than
two to one (105,000).
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/195000-fewer-americans-had-jobs-july-150000-dropped-out-labor-force
Many unemployed also uncountedhttp://www.sfgate.com/business/bottomline/article/Many-unemployed-also-uncounted-3725038.php
http://www.unionofunemployed.com/blog/recent-news/summary-of-u-s-real-unemployment-february-2012/
By: dfaugust2k
In: Politics
Tags: unemployment, food stamp president, pelosi, reid, democrats, leftsits, liberals
Location: United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 1870 | Comments: 94 | Votes: 2 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
J.C. Watts on Newt Racism Claim-"It's Mostly White People on Food Stamps!"
-
Oh Snap: Food Stamp President
-
Child burns to death in home. Aunt more worried about purse and food stamp card
-
Gingrich calls Obama 'food stamp president'
-
PELOSI: FOOD STAMP PRESIDENT 'BADGE OF HONOR'
-
USDA suggests food stamp parties, games to increase participation
-
Judicial Watch: Obama paying states to encourage food stamp usage.
-
Jesse Jackson: "It's An Honor To Be A Food Stamp President"
-
USDA suggests food stamp parties, games to increase participation
-
Pelosi/Reid 'Burn in hell' protest
-
USDA suggests food stamp parties, games to increase participation
-
18 Indicted in Food Stamp Fraud Investigation




....150,000 Dropped Out of Labor Force...
that's good news !
they must be independantly wealthy, living off the welfare dime !
more 'Bama voters !
oh YEAAAAH !
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByAiredale (2618.86) 
Airedale View Channel Send Message
(4)
@Airedale Actually 163,000 jobs were created. This article is BS. Look it up.
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByFoxbattle (176.50) Foxbattle View Channel Send Message
(-4)
@Foxbattle
I'm not looking up anything .
LIBtards claimed , as
I recall, 6% unemployment rate was considered DEPRESSION era... back in 2008.
why was that ?
What changed?
0h
and get ready for the REAL depression era five months down the road,
watch the job losses in January when the defense industry cuts hundreds of THOUSANDS of jobs as was agreed as the only option left to control the budget.
of course, president (R)omny will take the fall
or,oBama(D)umbass will finger point that (R)ich ar More..
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByAiredale (2618.86) 
Airedale View Channel Send Message
(3)
@Airedale You're right. If the military cuts jobs, it is going to increase unemployment. When did the military start hiring on a massive scale? Under the last president, back in 2003.
Back then did you remember to mention that Bush had an unfair advantage to his unemployment figures because he started those two wars?
I'm sure you did.
Remember, judge presidents on equal terms. If Bush had that advantage, you can't blame Obama for having that advantage too.
But on the other hand, it just mean More..
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByFoxbattle (176.50) Foxbattle View Channel Send Message
(-3)
@Foxbattle you really are mentally retarded, aren't you? exactly what wars did Bush start? do you mean the war in iraq, after sadaam invaded kuwait? you're probably retarded enough to believe a no-fly zone is a picnic indoors. is the other one afghanistan, where bin laden was hiding out? yeah, really good argument. how about coming up with something original, all on your own. stop sucking the worn out liberal dick.
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByAmusing (5223.08) Amusing View Channel Send Message
(1)
@Amusing I think you're confused. Saddam didn't invade Kuwait when the last Bush was president. That was in the 90's, not in 2003. Bush started two wars in his term. He was criticized for it, but "he was the decider".
You're trying to ignore the past, and be revisionist. That's dangerous stuff. Being ignorant or willingly lying about history is hurting the present and the future.
As they say, forget history, and you're doomed to repeat the same mistakes.
Posted Aug-4-2012 ByFoxbattle (176.50) Foxbattle View Channel Send Message
(-1)
Good thing it's almost 0ver for the worst piece of treasonous SHIT to ever stink up the White-house.
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByDave556 (1949.76) 
Dave556 View Channel Send Message
(4)
Since Libs live under the notion of unbiased news and facts, they should concern themselves with the real unemployment number, and that' known as the U-6 and is calculated separately from the "normal" unemployment number. This number is over 14% and includes those that have fallen off the registers.
This is an unmitigated disaster. And now let's bring on Obamacare.
Posted Aug-3-2012 Byyorba (1021.48) yorba View Channel Send Message
(3)
@yorba And that is the national average. It is higher in many places in the country.
Posted Aug-3-2012 Bykajidono (686.26)

kajidono View Channel Send Message
(0)
U-6
Posted Aug-3-2012 Byyorba (1021.48) yorba View Channel Send Message
(3)
@yorba Best damn comment in the whole thread right there.
Posted Aug-3-2012 Bykajidono (686.26)

kajidono View Channel Send Message
(1)
Thanks El Dumbo!! More Americans are out of work while more illegal aliens are flooding our borders and doing just GREAT thanks to you.
Ass hole.
Posted Aug-3-2012 Bydirtbiker201 (1457.78) 
dirtbiker201 View Channel Send Message
(2)
@dirtbiker201 This article is wrong, the BLS said the OPPOSITE. That Obama created jobs, just like he has done for the past two years.
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByFoxbattle (176.50) Foxbattle View Channel Send Message
(-3)
@IIVXTII You got me, Mitt has some nice non_alcoholic beverages that will make it all better.
Posted Aug-3-2012 Byrozza2012 (390.98) 
rozza2012 View Channel Send Message
(-2)
@IIVXTII - Google "private versus public sector jobs" and you will see Bush had a lower unemployment rate due to the HUGE number of government jobs added during his administration - the "socialist"! An you will find that Obama has created more Private sector jobs than Bush. NUMBERS DON'T LIE.
Posted Aug-3-2012 Byviennachoirboy (193.02) viennachoirboy View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@viennachoirboy But they were/are McWar jobs to even attempt to analyse them is to be in league with AlQuaida you dhimmi.
Posted Aug-3-2012 Byrozza2012 (390.98) 
rozza2012 View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@viennachoirboy
The republicans have convenient memory. No sense in arguing with them. They just blabber a lot of stuff out of context.
If they really want Romney to win, they are going to have to start being real schmoozers to the other side in order to gain votes (Maybe some ass kissing?). Bad-rapping and mud slinging just ensures the Liberals not to vote for Romney.
There's a book called "Winning Through Intimidation". A best seller at one time. The republicans should read it.
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByRhemis (974.38) 
Rhemis View Channel Send Message
(0)
Yes, I believe those numbers to be accurate. LOL
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByTooManyNewbs (93.40) TooManyNewbs View Channel Send Message
(2)
@TooManyNewbs You might want to believe it, but they aren't in reality.
That's how right wingers seem to think these days, they don't care about petty things like facts or science, they just FEEL they're right, no matter the evidence.
And that's all that matters to them.
THAT is why America is going down the shitter.
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByFoxbattle (176.50) Foxbattle View Channel Send Message
(-2)
@Foxbattle ~hey, pick up any carbon credits today?
Posted Aug-4-2012 Bydfaugust2k (1397.20) dfaugust2k View Channel Send Message
(0)
Oops sorry, thought this was about handjobs, misread title sorry.
Posted Aug-3-2012 Bybrian of nazareth (149.60) 
brian of nazareth View Channel Send Message
(2)
@brian of nazareth
LOL!
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByRhemis (974.38) 
Rhemis View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@brian of nazareth It is....
This thread is a republican circle jerk.
Posted Aug-3-2012 Bycastanza128 (619.82) 
castanza128 View Channel Send Message
(-1)
soooo these are the facts, not like the dumb ass liberal on a later post, said when romney is president, 160,000 people will lose their jobs. LMAO at the fortune telling Liberals. voted
Posted Aug-3-2012 Bystar53 (32481.60) 
star53 View Channel Send Message
(2)
The real unemployment rate is about 15%. Don't buy the crap that comes out of obama's mouth.
Posted Aug-4-2012 BySwellgh (408.90) 
Swellgh View Channel Send Message
(1)
@Swellgh The U-6 unemployment is higher, it has ALWAYS been higher and it has been going down for the last two years.
Posted Aug-4-2012 ByFoxbattle (176.50) Foxbattle View Channel Send Message
(1)
@Foxbattle ~bullshit.
Posted Aug-4-2012 Bydfaugust2k (1397.20) dfaugust2k View Channel Send Message
(0)
@dfaugust2k Well you go right ahead and google the numbers then. And report back to us and tell us what you find.
Posted Aug-4-2012 ByFoxbattle (176.50) Foxbattle View Channel Send Message
(-1)
thank goodness that government tit is still alive and doing well.
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByAmusing (5223.08) Amusing View Channel Send Message
(1)
Obamafail 101 - The new anti-economics class coming to a college history class.
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByMegadeth (1433.50) 
Megadeth View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Arizona_Patriot Read underneath, until you get it that the structural defilement of the means of exchange (fiat $) owns both sides, you are nothing but a useful idiot.
Posted Aug-3-2012 Byrozza2012 (390.98) 
rozza2012 View Channel Send Message
(-2)
@Arizona_Patriot There aren't more people dropping out than in previous quarters. The jobs are created, it doesn't say there are less unemployed, it says there are more people employed in jobs.
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByFoxbattle (176.50) Foxbattle View Channel Send Message
(-2)
@Foxbattle Google U-6 unemployment rate...we are at 15% unemployment in this country.
Posted Aug-3-2012 Byyorba (1021.48) yorba View Channel Send Message
(3)
@Foxbattle
I'm looking at the data from BLS now and I don't see what you are talking about.
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.a.htm
This data shows a minus - of 195,000 of "Employed" under the "Civilian work force" and minus - of 150,000 leaving the work force. Just like the article says.
Maybe you can help me understand this data.
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByArizona_Patriot (3118.66) 
Arizona_Patriot View Channel Send Message
(2)
@Arizona_Patriot For Gods sake wake up the, structure is corrupt. Both sides are defiled, do you think Dr Rons Audit the Fed bill will pass the Republican Senate, if it did do you think Obama would sign it?
Posted Aug-3-2012 Byrozza2012 (390.98) 
rozza2012 View Channel Send Message
(-2)
One of my videos just got rejected with this explanation :
==>explanation from moderator: "not in english"
What do you think ?
Is this a joke or a new rule ??
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByRetard (229.70) 
Retard View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Retard
Yes ;)
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByRhemis (974.38) 
Rhemis View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Rhemis This may sound unbelievable to you, but as a matter of fact it is true ! Censorship is a bad bad thing !;)
Herafter we all have to dub every Syrian mobile video before posting...
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByRetard (229.70) 
Retard View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Retard Wow.
Nice User name!
Look at this image...
http://www.bacharach-inc.com/images/products/gauge.jpg
I see the word "retard" every time I use refrigeration gauges.
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByRhemis (974.38) 
Rhemis View Channel Send Message
(1)
@Rhemis Hey...is that a real Retardmeter ??? ;)
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByRetard (229.70) 
Retard View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Retard you'll have to get used to retards running the circus. oh, didn't see the user name. lmao!
Posted Aug-3-2012 ByAmusing (5223.08) Amusing View Channel Send Message
(1)